[00:00:02]
[CALL TO ORDER]
IF YOU'D ALL RISE. AND PLEASE JOIN ME IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL THANK YOU VERY MUCH. FIRST ITEM IS THE CONSENT AGENDA.[CONSENT AGENDA ]
CONSENT AGENDA. THE CONSENT AGENDA WILL BE ACTED UPON IN ONE MOTION AND CONTAINS ITEMS THAT ARE ROUTINE AND TYPICALLY NONCONTROVERSIAL.ITEMS MAY BE REMOVED FROM THIS AGENDA FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION BY COMMISSIONERS OR STAFF.
HANG ON. I HAVE ONE OTHER. COMMISSIONER LINGENFELTER.
OKAY. THEN I'LL GO BACK TO MR. BRONSKY. I MOVE WE APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA.
LESS ITEM L AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. COMMISSIONER LINGENFELTER.
PLEASE VOTE. MOTION PASSES 7 TO 0. WE DO HAVE COMMISSIONER BENDER WHO IS NOT WITH US THIS EVENING.
[l. Preliminary Site Plan: UCD Plano Coit Addition, Block A, Lot 7 – Minor vehicle repair on one lot on 1.5 acres located on the south side of State Highway 121, 1,215 feet west of Coit Road. Zoned Regional Commercial and located within the State Highway 121 Overlay and the Expressway Corridor Overlay Districts. Project #PSP2026-012. (Administrative consideration) ]
UCD PLANO COIT ADDITION BLOCK A LOT 7 MINOR VEHICLE REPAIR ON ONE LOT ON 1.5 ACRES.LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF STATE HIGHWAY 121, 1215FT WEST OF COIT ROAD.
THIS ITEM IS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION.
GOOD EVENING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS MOLLY CORYELL WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE ABOUT THIS ITEM. THANK YOU. OKAY. COMMISSIONER BRONSKY. MS. CORYELL THIS PARTICULAR SITE CAME BEFORE US IN SEPTEMBER OF 2025.
IS THAT CORRECT? THAT IS CORRECT. THIS PARCEL WAS A PORTION OF A ZONING CASE THAT WAS TO PROPOSE TO REZONE THIS TRACT FROM RE REGIONAL EMPLOYMENT TO RC REGIONAL COMMERCIAL.
OKAY. AND WHEN IT CAME BEFORE US, IT WAS A 3 TO 3 TIE, CORRECT? THAT IS CORRECT. TWO MOTIONS WERE MADE. THE FIRST MOTION WAS MADE WAS TO APPROVE THE ITEM.
BOTH OF THESE VOTES FAILING RESULTED IN NO RECOMMENDATION.
OKAY. AND SO WHAT'S BEFORE US TONIGHT IS TALKS ABOUT A MINOR VEHICLE REPAIR ON ONE LOT.
WOULD THAT HAVE BEEN WOULD THIS LOT HAVE BEEN ELIGIBLE FOR THE MINOR VEHICLE REPAIR HAD IT NOT BEEN CHANGED BACK IN SEPTEMBER OR OCTOBER OR WHENEVER COUNCIL APPROVED IT? IT WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN BECAUSE MINOR VEHICLE REPAIR IS NOT AN ALLOWED USE IN THE REGIONAL EMPLOYMENT DISTRICT.
WHAT'S GOING IN HERE WAS NOT ALLOWED AT ONE POINT, AND THEN WE CHANGED IT.
AND THEN NOW LESS THAN A YEAR LATER, IT COMES BEFORE US AGAIN.
AND NOW THEY WANT TO PUT SOMETHING IN THERE THAT WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN ALLOWED PRIOR.
SO THANK YOU SO MUCH MS. CORYELL. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT.
SO ANOTHER QUESTION, MS. CORYELL. JUST REAL QUICK.
SO IS THE CURRENT PROPOSED USE CONSISTENT WITH THE ZONING THAT WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL? THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN IS CONSISTENT WITH THE REGIONAL COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT AS SHOWN TO THE COMMISSION.
DID I ANSWER THAT? ALL RIGHT. COMMISSIONER BRONSKY. I MOVE WE APPROVE AGENDA ITEM LETTER L AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.
[00:05:02]
PLEASE VOTE. MOTION PASSES 7 TO 0. ALL RIGHT.ALL RIGHT. ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION. ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION.
[1. Public Hearing – Replat: Willow Bend Lakes Phase IX, Block M, Lot 22R – One Single-Family Residence-9 lot on 1.1 acres located at the southeast corner of Windjammer Road and Winding Hollow Lane. Zoned Single-Family Residence-9. Project #R2026-026. (Administrative consideration) ]
PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. UNLESS INSTRUCTED OTHERWISE BY THE CHAIR.SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED IN THE ORDER REGISTRATIONS ARE RECEIVED.
THE PRESIDING OFFICER MAY MODIFY THESE TIMES AS DEEMED NECESSARY.
ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION ITEMS MUST BE APPROVED IF THEY MEET CITY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL ESTABLISH TIME LIMITS BASED UPON THE NUMBER OF SPEAKER REQUESTS, LENGTH OF THE AGENDA, AND TO INSURE MEETING EFFICIENCY AND MAY INCLUDE A TOTAL TIME LIMIT.
ITEM NUMBER ONE, PLEASE. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 1.
WILLOW BEND LAKES PHASE IX BLOCK M, LOT 22R. ONE SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 9 LOT ON 1.1 ACRES.
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF WINDJAMMER ROAD AND WINDING HOLLOW LANE.
ZONED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 9. THE APPLICANT IS ROBERT WRIGHT.
THIS ITEM IS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION.
GOOD EVENING COMMISSION. THIS IS A RESIDENTIAL REPLAT.
AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, HERE ARE THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPOSED REPLAT.
THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPLAT IS TO COMBINE TWO PARCELS INTO ONE LOT.
AS YOU CAN SEE HERE, THE PROPOSED NEW LOT LINES IN THE DARK BLACK BORDER OF THE REPLAT.
WE RECEIVED ONE LETTER IN FAVOR OF THIS REPORT FROM WITHIN 200FT OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY WITHIN THE SAME SUBDIVISION. NO OTHER RESPONSES WERE RECEIVED.
STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED AND I'D BE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
THANK YOU. COMMISSION ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? COMMISSIONER ALALI. I JUST HAVE ONE QUESTION LIKE, IS THERE LIKE AN UPPER LIMIT FOR SF9 LIKE, OR ARE THEY ALLOWED TO COMBINE THOSE? THERE IS NOT A MAXIMUM LOT SIZE FOR SF9.
OKAY. THANK YOU. AND CAN THEY LIKE, CAN THEY BUILD ANOTHER BUILDING ON IT LIKE ANOTHER HOUSE? OR IS IT GOING TO BE LIKE A. IT IS. AN ACCESSORY ONE SINGLE-FAMILY HOME PER LOT. THANK YOU. JUST TO CLARIFY, THEY MAY BE ABLE TO BUILD AN ACCESSORY DWELLING UNIT ON THE PROPERTY.
NOT UNDER SEPARATE OWNERSHIP THOUGH, OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. OKAY.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF? NOBODY? OKAY. WE DO HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING.
I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. DO WE HAVE ANY REGISTERED SPEAKERS? NO, WE DO NOT.
ALL RIGHT, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. COMMISSIONER BRONSKY.
MOVE WE APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 1 AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.
COMMISSIONER LINGENFELTER. I'LL SECOND.
PLEASE VOTE. MOTION PASSES 7 TO 0. ALL RIGHT.
IF YOU'D PLEASE READ ITEMS 2.A AND 2.B TOGETHER, PLEASE.
[2A.Public Hearing – Zoning Case 2025-021: Request to rezone 0.9 acre of land out of the Alex M. Hetfield Survey, Abstract No. 432, located at the northeast corner of Los Rios Boulevard and Fitzgerald Drive in the City of Plano, Collin County, Texas, to rezone 0.9 acre from Agriculture to Single-Family Residence-7 and to expand Specific Use Permit No. 582 for Private Recreation Facility from 1.1 acres to 1.6 acres. Project #ZC2025-021. (Legislative consideration)]
[2B.Public Hearing – Replat: Trails of Glenwood Phase 1, Block M, Lot 1R – Private recreation facility on one lot on 1.6 acres located on the northeast corner of Los Rios Boulevard and Fitzgerald Drive. Zoned Agricultural and Single-Family Residence-7 with Specific Use Permit No. 582 for Private Recreation Facility. Project #R2025-037. (Administrative consideration pending Agenda Item No. 2A)]
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2.A REQUEST TO REZONE 0.9 ACRE OF LAND OUT OF THE ALEX M HETFIELD SURVEY.ABSTRACT NO. 432. LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOS RIOS BOULEVARD AND FITZGERALD DRIVE IN THE CITY OF PLANO, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS TO REZONE 0.9 ACRE FROM AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 7 AND TO EXPAND SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER 582 FOR PRIVATE RECREATION FACILITY FROM 1.1 ACRES TO 1.6 ACRES. THE PETITIONER IS THE CITY OF PLANO AND TRAILS OF GLENWOOD, THE #1 HOA. THIS ITEM IS FOR LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATION.
ITEM NUMBER 2.B. TRAILS OF GLENWOOD. PHASE 1, BLOCK M.
LOT 1R. PRIVATE RECREATION FACILITY ON ONE LOT ON 1.6 ACRES.
LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LOS RIOS BOULEVARD AND FITZGERALD DRIVE.
THE APPLICANT IS THE CITY OF PLANO AND TRAILS OF GLENWOOD, THE #1 HOA.
THIS ITEM IS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION PENDING AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2.A.
THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. TI'ARA CLARK, PLANNER WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
THIS ZONING REZONING REQUEST IS A TWO-PART REQUEST.
HERE'S AN AERIAL OF THE TWO PARCELS ALONG LOS RIOS BOULEVARD.
THE IMAGE TO YOUR LEFT REPRESENTS THE 0.5 ACRE CITY OWNED PARCEL REQUESTING A REZONING FROM AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 7, AND THE IMAGE ON YOUR RIGHT REPRESENTS THE EXISTING TRAILS OF GLENWOOD HOA AMENITY LOT IN THE PROPOSED EXPANSION OF THE SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW PRIVATE
[00:10:08]
RECREATION FACILITY USES. SO JUST THE HISTORY OF THE CITY OWNED LOT.IT WAS ANNEXED IN 1999 AND ZONED AGRICULTURAL.
IN 2003 IT WAS ACQUIRED BY THE CITY. AND AS YOU CAN SEE, BASED OFF OF THE HISTORIC AERIAL IMAGES, IT WAS PART OF A LARGER PROPERTY ABOUT 6 ACRES.
AND THEN IN 2004, LOS RIOS BOULEVARD WAS CONSTRUCTED AS SEEN ON THE LOWER HISTORIC AERIAL IMAGE.
AND THEN JUST A BIT OF SITE HISTORY FOR THE AMENITY LOT.
SO IT WAS ALSO ANNEXED IN 1999 AND ZONED AGRICULTURAL.
IT WAS THEN REZONED TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 7 IN 2005.
IN 2008 HOA THE AMENITY CENTER WAS CONSTRUCTED AS SHOWN IN THE HISTORIC AERIAL IMAGE.
SO, AS MENTIONED BEFORE, THE PURPOSE OF THE REQUEST IS TO SELL THE PARCEL TO THE TRAILS OF GLENWOOD HOA FOR FUTURE EXPANSION OF THEIR PRIVATE AMENITY CENTER, AND THEREFORE THEY HAVE SUBMITTED A TWO-PRONGED REQUEST.
AND SO THE FIRST IS TO REZONE THE CITY OWNED PARCEL FROM AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE-FAMILY SEVEN TO MATCH THE SURROUNDING ZONING OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD. AND THE SECOND PART OF THE REQUEST IS TO EXPAND THE EXISTING PRIVATE RECREATION FACILITY, SUP BOUNDARIES TO INCLUDE THAT 0.5 ACRE CITY OWNED PARCEL, WHICH WILL THEN BE REPLATED AND COMBINED INTO ONE SINGLE LOT.
AND JUST AS A NOTE THROUGH THE SALE OF THIS PARCEL, THERE WILL BE A DEED RESTRICTION TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT 0.5 ACRES IS STILL DEVELOPED WITH PRIVATE RECREATION FACILITY USES OR OPEN SPACE USES.
SO WITHIN THIS SUBJECT PROPERTY, THERE WERE NO NOTICES RETURNED.
THERE WERE THREE IN SUPPORT AND ONE IN OPPOSITION.
AS FOR THE CITYWIDE RESPONSES, THERE WERE A TOTAL OF 12 RESPONSES RETURNED, 5 IN SUPPORT, 6 IN OPPOSITION AND ONE WHICH WAS NEUTRAL TO THE REQUEST.
AND SO THIS IS THE REPLAT THAT WAS SUBMITTED, WHICH IS JUST SHOWING THE COMBINATION OR COMBINING THE AMENITY LOT WITH THE CITY OWNED PARCEL, WHICH WILL MAYBE BE REPLATED. AND SO JUST A BIT OF ANALYSIS.
SO THIS SITE DOES HAVE A FEW CONSTRAINTS. ONE IT HAS BEEN UNDERUSED SINCE 1999.
AND YOU KNOW, IT'S ALSO SORT OF ISOLATED BY LOS RIOS BOULEVARD.
AND IT DOES HAVE A SMALLER SIZE AND A UNIQUE SHAPE.
AND SO THE CITY'S PARKS DEPARTMENT HAS NO PLANS TO DEVELOP IT AT THIS TIME.
AND IN TERMS OF SURROUNDING RESIDENTS USES FOR PARKS, THERE ARE OTHER PARKS WITHIN THE AREA THAT RESIDENTS CAN UTILIZE. AND SO WITH THE SELLER'S PROPERTY THERE WOULDN'T BE ANY EFFECT OF ANY EXISTING OR PLANNED IMPROVEMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH OAK POINT PARK SPECIFICALLY, WHICH IS DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM LOS RIOS BOULEVARD.
AND SO IN SUMMARY ITEM 2.A IS AGAIN, A TWO-PART REQUEST IS TO REZONE THE 0.9 ACRES FROM AGRICULTURAL TO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE. AND JUST AS A NOTE, THE 0.9 ACRES COMES FROM THE 0.5 ACRE OF THE CITY OWNED LOT AND THEN 0.4 ACRE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY CENTER LINE. AND THEN THE SECOND PART OF THE REQUEST IS TO EXPAND SUP-582 TO INCLUDE THE ADJACENT CITY OWNED PROPERTY WITHIN ITS
[00:15:07]
BOUNDARIES. AND THE COMPANION SUBMITTAL, WHICH WAS ITEM 2.B IS THE REPLAT TO COMBINE TWO PROPERTIES INTO A SINGLE LOT.CITY COUNCIL'S APPROVAL OF THIS ZONING CASE. THAT CONCLUDES MY PRESENTATION AND IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, LET ME KNOW. COMMISSIONERS ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? COMMISSIONER TONG. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY THAT IN THE END RESULT, THESE TWO PARCELS WERE COMBINED INTO ONE BLOCK.
ONE. WOULD THAT BE ONE OWNER OR TWO OWNERS? YES.
AND SO THE IDEA IS THAT IT WILL BE UNDER ONE OWNERSHIP.
IT WILL BE OWNED BY THE TRAILS OF GLENWOOD HOA AND WILL BE COMBINED INTO ONE LOT.
OKAY. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER ALALI. I WANTED TO KNOW.
SO NOW IT IS PART OF THE OPEN SPACE IN THE CITY, RIGHT? ZONING. AND LIKE THE DEED RESTRICTIONS, DO THEY ALLOW THEM TO BUILD ON THIS LOT OR EXPAND THEIR RECREATIONAL. BUT LIKE, WHAT DOES. WHAT DOES THAT MEAN? DO THEY CAN THEY BUILD A BUILDING ON THERE OR ARE THEY GOING TO KEEP IT OPEN SPACE? SURE. MR. BELL, DO YOU WANT TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION? YES.
IT WILL NOT ALLOW THEM TO BUILD ANOTHER SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLING ON THE PROPERTY.
IT COULD BE LIMITED TO USE OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD RESIDENTS.
AND ONE OF THE REASONS WHY THE CITY WASN'T ABLE TO DEVELOP IT IN THE PAST WAS SHAPE, CONFIGURATION AND ACCESS, JUST BECAUSE OF THE WAY LOS RIOS CUT IT.
OKAY. THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER ALALI.
I'M SORRY, I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION. SO, YOU KNOW, LIKE THE RIGHT OF WAY, THE POINT FOUR, IS IT GOING TO BE LIKE, IS IT. IT'S GOING TO BE DEDICATED AS AN EASEMENT.
SO IT'S NOT GOING TO CHANGE ANYTHING IN THE RIGHT OF WAY.
BECAUSE WE OWN IT. SO THE SUP BOUNDARY WILL ONLY BE PART OF THE BUILDABLE AREA.
IT WOULD INCLUDE THAT RIGHT OF WAY AREA. DOES THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? YEAH BUT IT'S IT STAYS AS A RIGHT OF WAY. RIGHT? IT'LL STAY AS RIGHT OF WAY. OUR TYPICAL PRACTICE IS TO ZONE TO THE CENTER LINE OF THE STREET WITH EVERY REZONING.
OKAY, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. DO WE HAVE ANY REGISTERED SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM? WE DO NOT. ALL RIGHT, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.
ALL RIGHT. COMMISSIONER OLLEY. I MOVE, WE APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2.A AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.
PLEASE VOTE. MOTION PASSES 7 TO 0.
ITEM 2.B COMMISSIONER BRONSKY. I MOVE WE APPROVE AGENDA ITEM 2.B AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.
COMMISSIONER OLLEY. SECOND. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE ITEM 2.B.
PLEASE VOTE. MOTION PASSES 7 TO 0.
ALL RIGHT. COMMENTS OF PUBLIC INTEREST. COMMENTS OF PUBLIC INTEREST.
THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING IS TO ALLOW UP TO THREE MINUTES PER SPEAKER, WITH 30 TOTAL MINUTES ON ITEMS OF INTEREST OR CONCERN, AND NOT ON ITEMS THAT ARE ON THE CURRENT AGENDA.
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MAY CHOOSE TO PLACE THE ITEM ON A FUTURE AGENDA.
THE PRESIDING OFFICER MAY MODIFY THESE TIMES AS DEEMED NECESSARY.
DO WE HAVE ANYBODY REGISTERED? WE DO NOT. ALL RIGHT.
SO ANY OTHER BUSINESS BEFORE THE NO? OKAY. THIS MEETING STANDS ADJOURNED AT 6:20 P.M.
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.