1. Public Hearing – Replat: Mustang Square Residential, Block B, 6-14, 1X, & 2X, Block F, Lots 1- 11, 13X, & 14X, & Block G, Lot 1X – 20 single-family detached lots and five common area lots on 3.6 acres located on the southwest corner of Community Court and Shoppers Lane. Zoned Planned Development-32-Regional Commercial and located within the State Highway 121 and Expressway Corridor Overlay Districts. Project #R2026-018. (Administrative consideration)

[1. Public Hearing – Replat: Mustang Square Residential, Block B, 6-14, 1X, & 2X, Block F, Lots 1- 11, 13X, & 14X, & Block G, Lot 1X – 20 single-family detached lots and five common area lots on 3.6 acres located on the southwest corner of Community Court and Shoppers Lane. Zoned Planned Development-32-Regional Commercial and located within the State Highway 121 and Expressway Corridor Overlay Districts. Project #R2026-018. (Administrative consideration)]

ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS UNLESS INSTRUCTED OTHERWISE BY THE CHAIR.

SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED IN THE ORDER REGISTRATIONS ARE RECEIVED.

APPLICANTS ARE LIMITED TO A TOTAL OF 15 MINUTES OF PRESENTATION TIME, WITH A FIVE MINUTE REBUTTAL IF NEEDED.

REMAINING SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO 30 TOTAL MINUTES OF TESTIMONY TIME, WITH THREE MINUTES ASSIGNED PER SPEAKER.

THE PRESIDING OFFICER MAY MODIFY THESE TIMES AS DEEMED NECESSARY.

ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION ITEMS MUST BE APPROVED IF THEY MEET CITY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.

LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATION ITEMS ARE MORE DISCRETIONARY EXCEPT AS CONSTRAINED BY LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS.

NON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL PERMIT LIMITED PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA NOT POSTED FOR A PUBLIC HEARING.

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL ESTABLISH TIME LIMITS BASED UPON THE NUMBER OF SPEAKER REQUESTS, LENGTH OF THE AGENDA AND TO INSURE MEETING EFFICIENCY AND MAY INCLUDE A TOTAL TIME LIMIT.

NUMBER ONE. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 1. MUSTANG SQUARE RESIDENTIAL BLOCK B, 6-14, 1X AND 2X, BLOCK F, LOTS 1-11, 13X AND 14X, AND BLOCK G, LOT 1X 20 SINGLE-FAMILY DETACHED LOTS AND FIVE COMMON AREA LOTS ON 3.6 ACRES LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF COMMUNITY COURT AND SHOPPERS LANE, ZONED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-32-REGIONAL COMMERCIAL, AND LOCATED WITHIN THE STATE HIGHWAY 121 AND EXPRESSWAY CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICTS.

THIS ITEM IS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION.

GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. DESTINY WOODS, PLANNER WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.

SO THIS GRAPHIC SHOWS THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSAL AND THIS ONE SHOWS THE PROPOSED REPLAT.

I ALSO WANT TO NOTE THAT THE REVISED SITE PLAN AND PRELIMINARY REPLAT FOR THIS PROPOSAL DID COME TO THE COMMISSION IN FEBRUARY OF THIS YEAR.

SO THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. THIS IS A REPLAT FOR BLOCKS B AND F WITHIN THE LARGER MUSTANG SQUARE RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.

THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING 15 NEW SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DETACHED LOTS AND WITHIN THESE BLOCKS AND A STREET LOT WILL ALSO BE CONNECTED TO BLOCK. EXCUSE ME, BLOCK G.

SO THE NEXT FEW. EXCUSE ME. I DON'T KNOW WHY I'M.

THE NEXT FEW SLIDES WILL PROVIDE SOME CONTEXT ON THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPLAT.

SO THIS SLIDE IS SHOWING THE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL.

AND THE APPLICANT ORIGINALLY PROPOSED A THESE LOTS HERE AND YOU'LL SEE IN THE NEXT SLIDE.

THE THIS PROPOSAL, THAT PROPOSAL WAS REVISED TO EXCLUDE ANY OF THE LOTS WITHIN THE FLOODPLAIN.

SO THIS IS HOW THE BLOCKS ARE CURRENTLY PLATTED.

AND TODAY THEIR PROPOSAL SHOWS THE LOTS NOW NOT WITHIN THE FLOODPLAIN.

SINCE THAT HAS BEEN REVISED AND THE APPLICANT IS REVERTING BACK TO SOMETHING SIMILAR TO THE ORIGINAL PROPOSAL.

SO NOTICE LETTERS WERE SENT OUT FOR THIS RESIDENTIAL REPLAT.

AND WE DID RECEIVE ONE OFFICIAL RESPONSE IN FAVOR THAT WAS PROVIDED TO YOU ALL.

AND THIS ITEM IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED.

I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

COMMISSION. ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF. NOBODY. OKAY, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

[00:05:02]

DO WE HAVE ANYBODY REGISTERED TO SPEAK ON THIS ITEM? WE DO NOT.

ALL RIGHT, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. COMMISSIONER BROUNOFF.

AND COMMISSIONER LINGENFELTER. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

MOTION PASSES 5 TO 0. ITEM NUMBER TWO. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 2, PLANO WEST

[2. Public Hearing – Preliminary Replat & Revised Site Plan: Plano West Senior High School, Block A, Lot 1R – Public school on one lot on 42.8 acres located at the northwest corner of Parker Road and Willow Bend Drive. Zoned Single-Family Residence-9 and Agricultural. Projects #PR2026-015 & #RSP2026-018. (Administrative consideration)]

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL, BLOCK A, LOT 1R - PUBLIC SCHOOL ON ONE LOT ON 42.8 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARKER ROAD AND WILLOW BEND DRIVE. ZONED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE 9 AND AGRICULTURAL.

THIS ITEM IS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION.

GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS ANNA SUITER, PLANNER FOR THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.

THIS SLIDE. THIS SLIDE SHOWS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY ALONG THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF PARKER ROAD AND WILLOW BEND DRIVE.

THE PURPOSE FOR THE PRELIMINARY REPLAT IS TO ABANDON AND DEDICATE EASEMENTS NECESSARY FOR THE PROPOSED BUILDING ADDITIONS.

THE PURPOSE FOR THE REVISED SITE PLAN IS TO SHOW FOUR PROPOSED BUILDING CORRIDORS, CONNECTING THE EXISTING BUILDINGS, AND ASSOCIATED IMPROVEMENTS FOR THE EXISTING PUBLIC SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT.

THE PRELIMINARY PLAT IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL, SUBJECT TO ADDITIONS AND OR ALTERATIONS TO THE ENGINEERING PLANS AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, AND THE REVISED SITE PLAN IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED.

I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. COMMISSION, ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF.

SEEING NONE, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY REGISTERED ON THIS ITEM? WE DO NOT. OKAY, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

COMMISSIONER BROUNOFF.

YES.

OKAY. I MOVE THAT AGENDA ITEM TWO, INCLUDING THE PRELIMINARY REPLAT AND THE REVISED SITE PLAN BE APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF.

ALL RIGHT. COMMISSIONER BENDER, I SECOND THE MOTION.

ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. AND COMMISSIONER LINGENFELTER, DID YOU HAVE A COMMENT? OKAY. MOTION PASSES 5 TO 0. ITEM NUMBER 3.

AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 3. REQUEST TO AMEND PLAN DEVELOPMENT-498-MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE-3 TO ALLOW MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE AS A PERMITTED USE ON 30.9

[3. Public Hearing – Zoning Case 2026-004: Request to amend Planned Development-498- Multifamily Residence-3 to allow multifamily residence as a permitted use on 30.9 acres of land out of the Maize R. Foster survey, Abstract No. 332, located on the east and west side of Park Vista Road, 160 feet south of Glenscape Circle, in the City of Plano, Collin County, Texas. Presently zoned Planned Development-498-Multifamily Residence-3 and located within the Expressway Corridor Overlay District. Tabled May 18, 2026. Project #ZC2026-004. (Request to withdraw from consideration)]

ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE MAIZE R. FOSTER SURVEY, ABSTRACT NO.

332, LOCATED ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF PARK VISTA ROAD, 160FT SOUTH OF GLEN CIRCLE, IN THE CITY OF PLANO.

COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS. PRESENTLY ZONED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 498-MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE-3, AND LOCATED WITHIN THE EXPRESSWAY CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT.

THIS ITEM WAS TABLED MAY 18TH, 2026. THIS IS A REQUEST TO WITHDRAW FROM CONSIDERATION.

GOOD EVENING, COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS TI'ARA CLARK.

I'M A PLANNER WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THE GRAPHIC ON YOUR SCREEN SHOWS THE AN AERIAL IMAGE OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY.

OF THE PARK VISTA PROPERTY ALONG PARK VISTA ROAD.

AS MENTIONED EARLIER, THE ITEM WAS TABLED AT THE MAY 18TH PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.

SINCE THAT TIME, THE APPLICANT HAS DECIDED TO SUBMIT A REQUEST TO WITHDRAW THEIR APPLICATION AND STAFF DOES RECOMMEND APPROVAL OR STAFF RECOMMENDS ACCEPTING THE PETITIONERS REQUEST TO WITHDRAW. I'M OPEN FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

ALL RIGHT. COMMISSION ANY QUESTIONS OF STAFF? SEEING NONE. ALL RIGHT. I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

AND WE DID WELL, WE DID HAVE A REQUEST TO WITHDRAW.

I KNOW THIS WAS POSTED FOR A PUBLIC HEARING AND PEOPLE DID COME OUT TO, TO OBSERVE THIS PUBLIC HEARING OR PARTICIPATE IN IT.

SO IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO STILL COME FORWARD AND GIVE YOUR TESTIMONY, WE ARE MORE THAN HAPPY TO LISTEN.

[00:10:03]

JUST UNDERSTANDING THAT THAT IT HAS BEEN RECOMMENDED AND BY STAFF AND, AND REQUESTED BY THE PETITIONER TO WITHDRAW THE CASE.

SO I DO BELIEVE WE DO HAVE SOME REGISTERED SPEAKERS.

WE DO WE HAVE DON BRYANT, FOLLOWED BY DOUG SHEA, FOLLOWED BY GLADYS BROWN.

GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS DON BRYANT.

AND I SAY FELLOW COMMISSIONERS, BECAUSE FULL TRANSPARENCY, I SERVE ON THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD FOR THE CITY OF MURPHY.

SO THANK YOU FOR. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME THIS EVENING.

I KNOW HOW VALUABLE IT IS. I JUST WANT TO SAY, MY 89 YEAR OLD MOTHER IN LAW MOVED INTO PARK VISTA ABOUT TWO YEARS AGO.

WE MOVED HER UP FROM SAN ANTONIO. WE OPPOSED THE ZONING REMOVING THE 55 PLUS REQUIREMENT.

THIS AREA IS SPECIFICALLY DESIGNED, AS YOU MAY KNOW, FOR SENIOR LIVING.

WE BELIEVE THAT, YOU KNOW, REMOVING THAT RESTRICTION PRETTY MUCH REMOVES ANYTHING.

THE RESIDENTS, YOU KNOW, MOVE THERE TO ENJOY PEACE AND QUIET, AS WELL AS CAMARADERIE WITH THEIR FELLOW SENIORS.

THAT WOULD BE COMPLETELY DISRUPTED BY REMOVING THAT AGE RESTRICTION.

THERE'S ALSO, YOU KNOW, SOME CONCERNS AS FAR AS SAFETY.

THERE'S CURRENTLY VERY LITTLE TRAFFIC THROUGH THAT AREA. OBVIOUSLY WITH THE SENIORS THERE.

IT SAYS IT'S 55 AND OVER, BUT MOST OF THE POPULATION OUT THERE BELIEVE IS 65 AND OVER PROBABLY AND ENJOYS LONG, LEISURELY WALKS ALONG THE PROPERTY. YOU KNOW, TRAFFIC IN THAT AREA IS NOT VERY WELL SUITED TO HANDLE A WHOLE LOT OF TRAFFIC THERE.

YOU KNOW, THE PROPERTY OWNERS THINK THAT REMOVING THAT AGE RESTRICTION PROMOTES A LITTLE BIT BETTER COMMUNITY AS FAR AS MIXING OF THE AGES AND SUCH LIKE THAT. I PERSONALLY DISAGREE WITH THAT. I THINK THAT, YOU KNOW, THERE'S A REASON THAT ALL THESE FOLKS MOVED TO THAT AREA.

SORRY. AND THE REASON FOR THAT IS THE, YOU KNOW, I SAID THE CAMARADERIE AND ENJOYING PEOPLE OF THEIR OWN AGE AND BEING ABLE TO, TO AVOID, IF YOU WILL, ALL THE, THE NOISE AND THE BIKES AND EVERYTHING ELSE THAT THAT TEENAGERS AND YOUNG CHILDREN WOULD BRING INTO THE AREA.

SO AGAIN, I THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. WE APPRECIATE THAT.

AND AGAIN, I THINK I SPEAK FOR THE MAJORITY OF THE RESIDENTS THERE, IF NOT ALL OF THEM THAT WE DO OPPOSE THAT.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. NEXT WE HAVE DOUG SHEA, FOLLOWED BY GLADYS BROWN, FOLLOWED BY SANDRA STRICKLAND. GOOD EVENING. THANK YOU. I'M DOUG SHEA. I LIVE AT PARK RESIDENCE OF PLANO.

WE LIKE THE PLACE THERE. WE'VE BEEN THERE. I'VE BEEN THERE WITH MY PARTNER FOR OVER THREE YEARS.

WE HAVE A GOOD TIME THERE. WE SIT OUT FRONT, WE CHIT CHAT.

WE TALK ABOUT EVERYTHING. WE WERE A BIT SURPRISED WHEN WE FOUND OUT THEY WANTED TO WITHDRAW THE 55 AND OVER, BECAUSE WE HAVE TROUBLE WITH TEENS GETTING IN THERE RIGHT NOW. THEY WERE IN THE COURTYARD PLAYING PICKLEBALL AT MIDNIGHT.

THEY WERE IN THE SWIMMING POOL RIGHT BEFORE THE CITY CLOSED IT. THEY SAY THEY ARE TAKING CARE OF EVERYTHING, BUT THEY DON'T MONITOR ANYTHING. AND WHEN YOU CALL TO HAVE SOMETHING DONE, YOU GET A VOICEMAIL.

IT TELLS YOU TO CALL. THEY'LL CALL YOU BACK. WELL, IT'S USUALLY THE NEXT DAY, WHICH IS WELL AFTER THE FACT.

WE HAVE LOTS OF I DON'T WANT TO SAY THIS. WE'RE WONDERING IF THERE'S A FEDERAL LAW THAT THEY'RE USING TO GO AROUND THE CITY OF PLANO.

WE DON'T KNOW BECAUSE THEY DON'T TELL US ANYTHING.

ALL EMAILS ARE DIRECTED FROM THE CORPORATE OFFICE. WE ASK THE OFFICE HOW COME WE DON'T GET ANYTHING FROM THEM? THEY SAID THEY'RE NOT REQUIRED TO SEND ANYTHING. IT HAS TO BE APPROVED FROM THE CORPORATE OFFICE IN MICHIGAN BEFORE THEY CAN ADDRESS US AT ALL.

SO WE'RE KIND OF SITTING HERE WAITING TO SEE WHAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN.

BUT OUT OF ALL THE PEOPLE THAT ARE THERE, EVERYBODY LOVES IT THERE.

THEY GET AROUND THE CHIT CHAT. THEY HELP EACH OTHER.

WE HAVE FRIDAY GET TOGETHERS WHERE WE MEET EVERYBODY.

SOME COME, SOME DON'T. I UNDERSTAND THAT PEOPLE WORK ALSO, AND WE HELP THEM OUT TOO, BECAUSE THEY STOPPED BY OUR PLACE AND CHIT CHAT WITH US WHEN WE'RE SITTING OUT FRONT. WE HAVE A LITTLE GREEN SPACE WE MADE, SO EVERYBODY LIKES TO COME BY THERE AND CHIT CHAT.

AND I BELIEVE THAT'S ALL I HAVE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR.

GLADYS BROWN AND THEN SANDRA STRICKLAND.

GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS GLADYS ELOISE BROWN.

I HAVE BEEN A RESIDENT AT PARK VISTA RESIDENCES FOR SEVEN MONTHS NOW.

[00:15:04]

I AM VERY MUCH A SENIOR, EVEN THOUGH SOME PEOPLE THINK I'M IN MY 30S.

OKAY, SO I VERY MUCH BELONG IN THAT AREA AND I'LL TELL YOU WHY.

I HAVE BEEN A RESIDENT OF TEXAS FOR ALMOST SEVEN YEARS NOW, COMING FROM NEW YORK, D.C., ATLANTA, AND SO FORTH. I LOVED TEXAS, I USED TO COME HERE FOR WORK PURPOSES.

I STILL WORK, I WORK FROM HOME FOR A VERY LARGE LAW FIRM IN HERE IN THE DFW AREA.

I LOVED I LOVED THAT AREA VERY MUCH. IT JUST CAME UPON ME ABOUT TWO YEARS AGO AT A SENIOR FAIR, AND THEY WERE THERE TALKING ABOUT THE PLACE, AND I MADE AN APPOINTMENT.

UNFORTUNATELY, I COULDN'T GET IN THERE 2024, BUT I WAS ABLE TO MOVE IN.

FINALLY, LAST YEAR THEY SHOWED ME THE PLACE AND IT WAS JUST QUIET, PEACEFUL, CLEAN.

THE NEIGHBORS ARE INCREDIBLE. IT'S LIKE WE'RE ALL ONE BIG VILLAGE, ONE BIG FAMILY NOW.

I MOVED OUT THERE BECAUSE IT IS 55 PLUS. WE HAVE NOTHING AGAINST CHILDREN.

WE HAVE CHILDREN, WE HAVE GRANDCHILDREN. WE HAVE GREAT GRANDCHILDREN.

WE LOVE THEM. BUT THIS IS A PLACE WHERE WE CAME TO RETIRE.

AND EVEN THOSE OF US THAT STILL WORK, WE WORK IN A PEACEFUL ENVIRONMENT.

WE UNDERSTAND THAT THE TOWER THERE, WE HAVE TOWERS, WE HAVE A TOWER OF APARTMENTS.

AND WE ALSO HAVE WHAT I CONSIDER TOWNHOMES. THEY CALL THEM COTTAGES.

IT'S JUST PERFECT LAYOUT FOR NOT ONLY MYSELF, BUT OUR VILLAGE.

I LIKE TO CALL IT. ALSO, THERE WAS MUCH CONCERN ABOUT THE NEW WELL, THE NEW CURRENT OWNERS, THAT THEY WANTED TO CHANGE IT INTO A MULTI-FAMILY COMMUNITY.

THAT'S NOT REALLY GOING TO MAKE IT THERE. AND THE APARTMENTS AND THE AREAS REALLY NOT FAMILY ORIENTED.

IT'S NOT FAMILY MADE UP THOSE APARTMENTS AND THOSE TOWNHOMES ARE REALLY JUST GOOD ENOUGH SIZE FOR A COUPLE OR A SINGLE PERSON LIKE MYSELF. IT REALLY JUST DOESN'T MAKE ANY SENSE.

WE NEED OUR AREA TO REMAIN THAT WAY. EVEN OUR NEIGHBORS IN THE SURROUNDING HOMES SURROUND THE AREA ON THE LANDSCAPE.

AGREE WITH US. THEY FEEL LIKE IT WOULD JUST DOWNPLAY THE VALUE OF THEIR HOMES.

IN FACT, WHEN THEY FOUND OUT THAT THAT AREA WAS GOING TO BE MADE OF 55 PLUS AREA.

THEY LOVED IT. I SHOULD HOPE THAT WHILE I'M GLAD TO HEAR THAT THEY WITHDRAW, BUT STILL, IF IT'S GOING TO BE ON THE BOOKS.

IF YOU CAN WRAP IT UP FOR US. OH YEAH. I'M SORRY.

IT'S DONE. OKAY. I WANTED TO BRING UP THOSE POINTS.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU FOR BEING HERE. OKAY.

SANDRA STRICKLAND. OKAY.

THOSE ARE ALL OF OUR REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR TONIGHT.

OH, THERE'S MISS STRICKLAND. SORRY. DIDN'T SEE YOU COMING FORWARD.

HI, I'M SANDRA STRICKLAND. I'VE LIVED AT PARK VISTA.

I MEAN, PARK RESIDENCE PLANO FOR THREE YEARS, AND I'VE TALKED TO PEOPLE AROUND SINCE THIS PETITION STARTED.

SOME HAVE LIVED THERE FOR YEARS. SOME OF THEM WATCHED THE TOWER THAT I LIVE IN BE BUILT.

THERE IS A VILLAGE THERE. AS GLADYS SAID, WE WATCH AFTER EACH OTHER.

WE HAVE WAYS OF COMMUNICATING WITH EACH OTHER BY PHONE OR KNOCKING ON THE WALL, OR WHATEVER IT TAKES TO GET HELP IF WE NEED IT.

THE PEOPLE THERE JUST IT'S JUST A GREAT PLACE TO BE, AND I WOULD HATE TO SEE ANYTHING IN THAT ENVIRONMENT. I THINK AS WE GET OLDER, WE ALL LOOK FORWARD TO PEACE, QUIET AND TRANQUILITY.

AND OUR PLACE DOES THAT. WE HAVE NATURE, WE HAVE THE CREEK.

WE HAVE BIRDS, BUNNIES IN THE FLOWER BEDS, ARMADILLOS THAT LOVE TO TUMBLE THROUGH THE FLOWER BEDS TOO.

I THINK IT WOULD BE VERY DISRUPTIVE TO ALL OF OUR LIVES AND AT OUR AGE, CHANGE IS TOUGH AT ITS BEST.

I APPRECIATE YOUR CONSIDERATION FOR ALL OF THESE THINGS I'VE SAID.

THANK YOU. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER SPEAKERS? OKAY, I'M GOING TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

[00:20:06]

AND JUST TO INFORM THE PEOPLE THAT JOINED US TONIGHT THE CASE IS BEING WITHDRAWN OR WILL NO LONGER BE UNDER THE JURISDICTION OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

AND THE REASON IT'S BEING WITHDRAWN IS BECAUSE FOR LEGAL REASONS, THE CITY WILL HAS ELECTED TO NO LONGER ENFORCE THE AGE RESTRICTION ON THIS PROPERTY.

I'M NOT AT LIBERTY TO DISCUSS ANY DETAILS, BUT DID WANT TO MAKE SURE Y'ALL WERE AWARE THAT THAT IS WHY THE CASE IS BEING WITHDRAWN.

AND SO JUST IN THE INTEREST OF FULL TRANSPARENCY.

SO WITH THAT SAID, COMMISSIONER BROUNOFF. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. I MOVE THAT WITH RESPECT TO ITEM NUMBER THREE, WE APPROVE THE REQUEST TO WITHDRAW AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF COMMISSIONER OLLEY.

THAT'S RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. PLEASE VOTE.

MOTION PASSES 5 TO 0. ITEM NUMBER 4.

AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 4, LOS RIOS VILLAGE, BLOCK 1, LOT 3.

[4. Preliminary Site Plan: Los Rios Village, Block 1, Lot 3 – Restaurant with drive-through on one lot on 1.1 acres located at the northeast corner of 14th Street and La Paz Drive. Zoned Retail. Project #PSP2025-030. (Legislative consideration of residential adjacency screening)]

RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE THRU ON ONE LOT ON 1.1.

ACRES. LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE 14TH STREET AND LA PAZ DRIVE.

ZONED RETAIL. THIS ITEM IS FOR LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATION OF RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY SCREENING.

GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. TI'ARA CLARK, PLANNER WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THE GRAPHIC ON YOUR SCREEN SHOWS AN AERIAL IMAGE OF THE VACANT LOT ALONG 14TH STREET IN LOS RIOS BOULEVARD. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING A DRIVE THRU RESTAURANT ON THE VACANT LOT. THE DRIVE THRU LANE CONTAINS TWO MENU BOARDS AND INDIVIDUAL SERVICE SPEAKERS THAT ARE LOCATED WITHIN PROXIMITY TO THE RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD TO THE WEST, AND THIS ACTUALLY TRIGGERS THE RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY STANDARDS WITHIN THE ZONING ORDINANCE.

ONE SPEAKER, AS SHOWN IN THE SOUTHERN RED LINE, IS 141FT AWAY FROM THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT BOUNDARY, AND THAT'S ACTUALLY MEASURED FROM THE CENTER LINE OF LA PAZ DRIVE.

THAT SPEAKER BOARD IS ACTUALLY 171FT FROM THE NEAREST RESIDENTIAL LOT LINE.

THE SECOND SPEAKER IS ABOUT 149FT FROM THE RESIDENTIAL BOUNDARY LINE THAT'S MEASURED AT THE CENTER LINE OF LA PAZ DRIVE.

UNDER THESE STANDARDS, THE COMMISSION MAY REQUIRE ADDITIONAL SCREENING FOR BUFFERING AND TO MITIGATE ANY NOISE IMPACTS THAT THE SPEAKER BOARDS MAY HAVE ON THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, AND THEREFORE THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING AN EIGHT FOOT TALL SOLID LIVING SCREEN INSTALLED ATOP AT ONE FOOT A BERM ALONG THE ENTIRE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE.

TO KIND OF SEPARATE THE MENU BOARDS FROM THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT.

AND WITH THAT, STAFF APPROVES THE WHAT'S BEING PROPOSED BY THE APPLICANT TO CONSTRUCT THE EIGHT FOOT SOLID SCREEN ALONG THE WESTERN PROPERTY LINE OF THE VACANT LOT. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS.

THANK YOU. ONE QUICK QUESTION. WHAT IS THE SPACING REQUIREMENT? THAT THAT THEY'RE ASKING FOR THE VARIANCE FROM WHAT IS THE WHAT IS THE DISTANCE THAT WE NORMALLY REQUIRE FOR A SPEAKER TO BE FROM RESIDENTIAL? THE DISTANCE FROM THE INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS FROM THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT SHOULD BE ABOUT 150FT, WHICH TRIGGERS THE RESIDENTIAL ADJACENCY STANDARDS.

AND SO THIS MENU BOARD IS 141FT. OKAY, SO IT'S 100 141FT FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE ROAD.

FROM THE CENTER LINE, BUT 171FT FROM THE RESIDENTIAL BOUNDARY.

IT MEETS THE RESTRICTION FROM THE PROPERTY LINE, BUT NOT FROM THE ZONING DISTRICT.

THAT'S CORRECT. THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THAT WAS MY QUESTION. COMMISSION, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF? MR. COMMISSIONER BROUNOFF. YOU KNOW, I REALIZE THAT THE DISTANCE HERE IS VERY CLOSE TO THE 150FT ABOVE, WHICH THERE WOULD BE NO REQUIREMENT TO SCREEN, BUT I WAS I'M CURIOUS HOW EFFECTIVE IS A LIVING SCREEN AT BLOCKING NOISE? SURE, I THINK WITH THIS LIVING SCREEN BEING INSTALLED ABOUT EIGHT FEET HIGH, I THINK IT COULD BE PRETTY EFFECTIVE IN SCREENING.

NOT ONLY THAT SINCE THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IS 171FT FROM WHAT IS TYPICALLY REQUIRED AT 150FT, I THINK THAT THE, THE SOLID LIVING SCREEN WOULD SERVE OR WOULD MITIGATE AGAINST THOSE NOISE IMPACTS.

I GET ALL THAT. I'M JUST WONDERING, LIKE LIVING SCREEN CONSISTS OF, YOU KNOW, BRANCHES AND LEAVES, AND I'M WONDERING WHAT ARE THE SOUND ABSORBING PROPERTIES OF BRANCHES AND LEAVES? I MEAN. YES, UNFORTUNATELY, I DON'T KNOW THE EXACT ANSWER TO THAT.

[00:25:04]

HOWEVER, OUR CITY'S TREE FORESTER HAS REVIEWED THE CITY'S PLANTING LIST AND RECOMMENDED CERTAIN SPECIES FOR NOISE SCREENING, AND SO THEY WILL BE COMPLYING WITH THOSE TREE SPECIES AND PLANT SPECIES.

OKAY. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF? NOBODY. OKAY. THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY REGISTERED TO SPEAK? WE DO NOT. ALL RIGHT. COMMISSIONER LINGENFELTER.

ALL RIGHT, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE THIS AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF, ESPECIALLY SINCE IT'S IT.

IT IS ADDING ADDITIONAL SCREENING AND SOUND BUFFERING.

THAT WOULDN'T BE THERE IF IT WAS NINE FEET LONGER AND.

AND IT JUST MAKES SENSE, SO. COMMISSIONER OLLEY.

ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND.

MOTION PASSES 5 TO 0. ITEM NUMBER 5.

AGENDA ITEM NUMBER 5. DAL-TEX MAPLESHADE ADDITION, BLOCK 1, LOT 2.

[5. Revised Conveyance Plat & Concept Plan: Dal-Tex Mapleshade Addition, Block 1, Lot 2 – 475 multifamily residence units on one lot on 5.1 acres located on the north side of Mapleshade Lane, 2,100 feet west of Coit Road. Zoned Corridor Commercial and located within the 190 Tollway/Plano Parkway Overlay District. Project #RCOP2026-002 & #CP2026-003. (Legislative consideration of Subdivision Ordinance variance)]

475 MULTI–FAMILY RESIDENCE UNITS ON ONE LOT ON 5.1 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MAPLESHADE LANE.

02,100FT WEST OF COIT ROAD. ZONE ZONED CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL AND LOCATED WITHIN THE 190 TOLLWAY/PLANO PARKWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT.

THIS ITEM IS FOR LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATION OF SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE VARIANCE.

GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS JOHN KIM, PLANNING, SENIOR PLANNER WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.

HERE IS THE MAP. THIS IS CURRENTLY AN UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MAPLESHADE LANE, ABOUT 2,100FT WEST OF COIT ROAD. HERE IS THE, EXCUSE ME, THE REVISED CONVEYANCE PLAT THAT ACCOMPANIES THIS REQUEST, AS WELL AS THE CONCEPT PLAN.

ON THE CONCEPT PLAN, IT IS SHOWING A PROPOSED LAYOUT OF THE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE DEVELOPMENT AND RELATED SITE IMPROVEMENTS.

THERE IS CURRENTLY AN EXISTING PLATTED FIRE LANE AND ACCESS EASEMENT ALONG THE EASTERN SIDE OF THE PROPERTY.

THE PLAN SHOWS A PATH OF DIRECT ACCESS THAT LINES UP WITH THAT EASEMENT TO AN EXISTING MAPLE SHADE MEDIAN.

THE APPLICANT IS SEEKING A VARIANCE WITH THIS PROPOSAL WITH THIS DEVELOPMENT TO ENSURE THE LOT IS AVAILABLE AS A STANDALONE LOT.

RIGHT. SO HERE'S THE REQUEST. IN THE SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, THERE IS A REQUIREMENT FOR MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENTS TO PROVIDE AN INTERNAL QUASI PUBLIC STREET NETWORK.

IF IT IS TOTAL IN TOTAL, OVER FIVE ACRES IN SIZE.

THIS LOT IS 5.066 ACRES IN SIZE AND IRREGULAR SHAPED LOT.