* This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting. [CALL TO ORDER ] [00:00:02] WELCOME TO THE FEBRUARY 2ND PLANNING PLAN, CITY OF PLANO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. I'M CALLING THE ORDER, THE MEETING TO ORDER TONIGHT AT 6:00 PM IF YOU WOULD ALL PLEASE RISE AND JOIN ME IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, MY PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, REPUBLIC NATION JUSTICE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. UM, COMMENTS OF PUBLIC INTEREST? THERE ARE NONE. NOBODY'S REGISTERED. ALRIGHT. CONSENT [CONSENT AGENDA ] AGENDA. CONSENT AGENDA. CONSENT AGENDA WILL BE ACTED UPON IN ONE MOTION AND CONTAINS ITEMS THAT ARE ROUTINE AND TYPICALLY NON-CONTROVERSIAL. ITEMS MAY BE REMOVED FROM THIS AGENDA FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION BY COMMISSIONERS OR STAFF COMMISSION. ANYBODY WOULD LIKE TO REMOVE AN ITEM FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. AND, UM, WE DO HAVE COMMISSIONER LINGENFELTER ON ZOOM AS WELL. SO, UM, COMMISSIONER, IF YOU WANT TO MAKE A MOTION OR SOMETHING, JUST RAISE YOUR HAND AND TRY TO GET MY ATTENTION IF YOU WOULD PLEASE. ALRIGHT. UH, DOES ANYBODY WANNA REMOVE AN ITEM FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA? NOBODY. COMMISSIONER BRONSKI, I MOVE. WE APPROVE, UH, THE CONSENT AGENDA AS SUBMITTED. COMMISSIONER BRUNO? I SECOND THE MOTION. ALRIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND PLEASE VOTE. AND COMMISSIONER LINGENFELTER YOUR VOTE. THUMBS UP. OKAY, I'LL TAKE THAT AS AN AYE. MOTION PASSES EIGHT TO ZERO. ALRIGHT, [Items 1A. (DW) & 1B. (DW)] ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION. ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS, UNLESS INSTRUCTED OTHERWISE BY THE CHAIR SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED AND THE ORDER REGISTRATIONS ARE RECEIVED. APPLICANTS ARE LIMITED TO A TOTAL OF 15 MINUTES OF PRESENTATION TIME WITH A FIVE MINUTE REBUTTAL IF NEEDED. REMAINING SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO 30 TOTAL MINUTES OF TESTIMONY TIME WITH THREE MINUTES ASSIGNED PER SPEAKER. THE PRESIDING OFFICER MAY MODIFY THESE TIMES AS DEEMED NECESSARY. ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION ITEMS MUST BE APPROVED IF THEY MEET CITY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATION ITEMS ARE MORE DISCRETIONARY EXCEPT AS CONSTRAINED BY LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS. NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS RESIDING OFFICER WILL PERMIT LIMITED PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA NOT POSTED FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. RESIDING OFFICER WILL ESTABLISH TIME LIMITS BASED UPON THE NUMBER OF SPEAKER REQUESTS, LENGTH OF THE AGENDA, AND TO ENSURE MEETING EFFICIENCY AND MAY INCLUDE A TOTAL TIME LIMIT. WOULD YOU LIKE ME TO READ BOTH ITEMS? YES. READ ITEM ONE A AND ONE B TOGETHER PLEASE. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER ONE A, A REQUEST TO REZONE 14.6 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE JOAB BUTLER. SURVEY ABSTRACT NUMBER 46, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF LOS RIOS BOULEVARD, 1,250 FEET NORTH OF MERRIMAN DRIVE IN THE CITY OF PLANO, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS FROM PLAN DEVELOPMENT 1 73. ESTATE DEVELOPMENT TO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SIX. THIS ITEM WAS TABLED NOVEMBER 17TH, 2025 AND JANUARY 5TH, 2026. PETITIONER'S MEADOWS BAPTIST CHURCH AGENDA ITEM NUMBER ONE B MEADOWS BROOK EDITION AND MEADOWS BAPTIST CHURCH EDITION BLOCK ONE LOT ONE R 58, SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE, SIX LOTS, TWO COMMON AREA LOTS AND A RELIGIOUS FACILITY ON ONE LOT ON 27.3 ACRES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOS RIOS BOULEVARD AND MERRIMAN DRIVE ZONE PLAN DEVELOPMENT 1 73 ESTATE DEVELOPMENT. THE APPLICANT IS MEADOWS BAPTIST CHURCH. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. DESTINY WOODS PLANNER WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. UM, THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO TABLE THIS ITEM TO THE MARCH 2ND PNZ MEETING. UM, THEY HAVE MET WITH THIS SURROUNDING COMMUNITY AND ARE GOING TO BE CHANGING THE REQUEST TO SF SEVEN INSTEAD OF, UM, THE INITIAL, UH, INITIAL REQUESTED SF SIX ZONING. UM, AND THAT'S GONNA BE TO ADDRESS SOME OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD CONCERNS THAT WE HEARD LAST TIME. UM, SO THIS ITEM IS BOTH ITEMS ARE RECOMMENDED TO BE, UM, TABLED TO THE MARCH 2ND, 2026 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THE APPLICANT IS ALSO HERE. COMMISSION QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF? NOBODY. OKAY. I DO HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING, SO LET'S OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. DO WE HAVE ANYBODY REGISTERED TO SPEAK? I KNOW WE HAVE THE APPLICANT HERE, BUT THERE ARE NONE. OKAY. ALRIGHT, I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING COMMISSION. COMMISSIONER BRONSKI. SO I'D LIKE TO FIRST START OFF BY SAYING THIS IS, UH, PART OF THE REASON I THINK IT'S GREAT THAT, UH, OUR DEVELOPERS AND NEIGHBORS CAN WORK TOGETHER. AND SO WITH THAT GOOD HEART IN MIND, I MOVE THAT WE A TABLE AGENDA ITEM ONE A TO THE MARCH 2ND, 2026, PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. COMMISSIONER BRUNO? UM, I AGREE WITH [00:05:01] COMMISSIONER BRODSKY'S COMMENTS AND I SECOND THE MOTION. ALRIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ANY COMMENTS? ANYBODY PLEASE VOTE. COMMISSIONER LINCOLNFELTER AYE. MOTION PASSES EIGHT TO ZERO, RIGHT ITEM ONE B. COMMISSIONER BRONSKI, I MOVE WE, UH, TABLE ITEM ONE B TO THE MARCH 2ND, 2026. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. COMMISSIONER BRUNO, I SECOND THE MOTION. ALRIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND, PLEASE VOTE. COMMISSIONER LINCOLNFELTER. AYE. MOTION PASSES EIGHT TO ZERO, RIGHT. ITEM TWO, AGENDA ITEM [2. (MC) Public Hearing – Zoning Case 2025-016: Request to amend Specific Use Permit No. 56 for Commercial Antenna Support Structure on 0.1 acre of land out of the Maria C. Vela Survey, Abstract No. 935, located 225 feet north of Democracy Drive and 220 feet east of Partnership Road, in the City of Plano, Collin County, Texas, presently zoned Commercial Employment. Project #ZC2025-016. Remanded by City Council on January 12, 2026. Petitioner: Democracy Partners, Ltd. (Legislative consideration)] NUMBER TWO, REQUEST TO AMEND SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER 56 FOR COMMERCIAL AND TENANT SUPPORT STRUCTURE ON 0.1 ACRE OF LAND OUT OF THE MARIA C VELA SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 9 35 LOCATED 220 FEET NORTH OF DEMOCRACY DRIVE AND 220 FEET EAST OF PARTNERSHIP ROAD IN THE CITY OF PLANO, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS. PRESENTLY ZONED COMMERCIAL EMPLOYMENT REMANDED BY CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 12TH, 2026. PETITIONER'S DEMOCRACY PARTNERS, LTD. THIS ITEM IS FOR LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATION. GOOD EVENING COMMISSION. MY NAME IS MOLLY CORELLE, LEAD PLANNER WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THE, UH, REQUEST AT HAND IS FOR THE EXISTING SUP NUMBER 56, WHICH IS SHOWN ON THIS AERIAL. AND AS YOU CAN SEE, THE ADJACENT ZONING OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS ALL IN THE COMMERCIAL EMPLOYMENT DISTRICT. THIS REQUEST, UM, COMING FORWARD TO YOU TONIGHT, UM, IS STILL LARGELY THE SAME. SO THEY ARE STILL PROPOSING TO REDUCE THE PERMITTED HEIGHT FROM 120 FEET TO 95 FEET, AND ADDITIONALLY, THEY ARE CHANGING THE SI, UH, DESIGN FROM A STEALTH MONOPOLE TO A HUMAN INITIATED TREE OR A FAUX TREE AND THERE'S NO CHANGES BEING MADE TO THE BASE. COMMERCIAL EMPLOYMENT ZONING. A LITTLE BIT OF HISTORY FOR YOU. SO ORIGINALLY THIS REQUEST WAS APPROVED IN MAY OF 2024. THE REQUEST WAS FOR A STEALTH MONOPOLE TOWER FOR UP TO 120 FEET. HOWEVER, THE INITIAL DESIGN WAS A TREE DESIGN, WHICH YOU SEE AT THE IMAGE AT THE TOP OF THE SCREEN. UM, THE REQUEST WAS REVISED TO A FLAGPOLE DESIGN THROUGHOUT THE COMMENT REVIEW PROCESS BETWEEN STAFF AND THE APPLICANT. HOWEVER, IN JULY, 2025, UH, JUST OVER A YEAR LATER, PNZ APPROVED A TWO YEAR WAIVER FOR THIS REQUEST, UM, FOR A TWO YEAR WAITING PERIOD FOR THIS REQUEST. SO THE APPLICANT COULD COME BACK AND REVISE THEIR REQUEST, UM, WHICH THEY SUBMITTED IN SEPTEMBER OF 2025. AND THEY DID WANT TO GO BACK TO THE FAUX TREE DESIGN. SOME ADDITIONAL HISTORY SINCE THIS ITEM WAS LAST HEARD AT PNZ IN NOVEMBER, 2025, THE ITEM WAS SCHEDULED FOR PNZ AND THE COMMISSION VOTED FOR FOUR, WHICH, UH, MOVED THE ITEM FORWARD AUTOMATICALLY TO COUNCIL WITH NO RECOMMENDATION IN JANUARY, 2026. HOWEVER, THE ITEM WENT TO CITY COUNCIL, UM, AND THE APPLICANT WAS PROPOSING SIGNIFICANT DESIGN CHANGES AND SO THE APPLICANT REQUESTED THAT THE ITEM BE REMANDED BACK TO P AND Z SO THAT THE P AND Z, THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION COULD CONSIDER THE CHANGES INTO THE DESIGN PRIOR TO THE ITEM BEING HEARD AT CITY COUNCIL. SO AS YOU CAN SEE WITH THESE TWO IMAGES, AND IT'S ACTUALLY BIGGER ON THE NEXT SLIDE, YOU CAN SEE THAT THE PREVIOUS DESIGN THAT PNZ CONSIDERED OVER TO YOUR LEFT YES, UM, IS THE ORIGINAL MONO EUCALYPTUS DESIGN. HOWEVER, THE DESIGN, UH, REVISED DESIGN NOW EMULATES A MAGNOLIA TREE. AS YOU CAN SEE, IT'S MORE OF A BROAD LEAF DESIGN WITH BRANCHES THAT EXTEND CLOSER TO THE BOTTOM OF THE, UH, UM, FAKE TRUNK BOW TRUNK AREA AND THEN EXTEND OUTWARDS AND THEN KIND OF CREATE A CONICAL SHAPE MOVING UP, WHICH EMULATES A MAGNOLIA TREE, WHICH IS A NATIVE SPECIES. AGAIN, AN SCP IS REQUIRED IF THE STRUCTURE, IF THE POLE STRUCTURE IS OVER 60 FEET IN HEIGHT. AND THERE ARE ZONING INCENTIVES FOR STEALTH TOWER DESIGN. UM, AND, UM, THAT INCLUDES, UM, FAUX TREES. UM, AND IF THE, IN, IN THIS CASE, THE TOWER IS MIMICKING A NATIVE TREE SPECIES AND FORM, WHICH IS REQUIRED IN ORDER TO MEET THE STEALTH DESIGN, WHICH IS A CHANGE FROM THE PREVIOUS REQUEST THAT THE COMMISSION HEARD IN NOVEMBER, IS THAT IT'S NOW MEETING [00:10:01] THE PURPOSE OF A STEALTH DESIGN BY EMULATING A NATIVE TREE. THE PROPOSED TOWER IS 95 FEET IN HEIGHT. THEY ARE PROPOSING A MAGNOLIA TREE DESIGN AND, UH, WITH THREE CARRIERS, THE UH, STRUCTURE IS NEXT TO AN EXISTING BUILDING THAT IS 27 FEET IN HEIGHT AND AN EIGHT FOOT MASONRY SCREENING WALL . THE REQUEST DOES NOT CHANGE THE LAND USE. SO THE COMPREHENSIVE, UH, SO OUR LONG RANGE PLANNING TEAM DID NOT COMPLETE A FULL, UM, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN ANALYSIS. HOWEVER, UH, COMMUNITY DESIGN ACTION THREE SEEKS TO MINIMIZE VISUAL IMPACT OF OVERHEAD UTILITIES AND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITIES. AND OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING TEAM DID PROVIDE IN THE STAFF REPORT THAT THE FAUX TREE DESIGN EMULATES A MAGNOLIA TREE, WHICH DOES REDUCE THE VISUAL PROMINENCE AND IS THEREFORE MEETING THE PURPOSE OF THAT ACTION WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY RESPONSES WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE ZONING REQUEST, AND ADDITIONALLY, WE'VE RECEIVED ONE'S RESPONSE CITYWIDE IN FAVOR OF THE REQUEST. SO IN SUMMARY, THE REQUEST TONIGHT IS TO AMEND THE EXISTING SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER 56, SORRY, THAT SAYS 65. IT'S SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER 56, UM, FOR A COMMERCIAL ANTENNA SUPPORT STRUCTURE TO REDUCE THE HEIGHT FROM 120 TO 95 FEET AND TO CHANGE THE DESIGN FROM THE STEALTH MONOPOLE TO THE HUMAN INITIATED TREE. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING. THAT WOULD BE, UH, THAT THE PLAN NEEDS, THAT NEEDS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE APPROVED SITE PLAN, THE, UH, FAUX TREE DESIGN, AND THEN, UM, THAT ALL ANTENNAS AND OTHER EQUIPMENT ATTACHED TO THE SUPPORT STRUCTURE MUST BE SCREENED FROM VIEW BY THE FAUX TREE FOLIAGE. AND NAMELY THAT THE SUPPORT STRUCTURE, ELEVATION AND ASSOCIATED DETAILS ON PAGE TWO OF THE ZONING EXHIBIT ARE ADOPTED AS PART OF THE ORDINANCE. THANK YOU SO MUCH AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE TONIGHT AS WELL. OKAY. QUESTIONS OF THE STAFF COMMISSIONER BURNOFF? OH, I'M SORRY. I WAS, UM, HOPING TO SPEAK AFTER MR. BRONSKI. OH, OKAY. UM, COMMISSIONER ALI. UH, JUST ONE, WHAT'S OUR PROCESS TO MAKE SURE THOSE REQUIREMENTS THAT YOU LAID OUT ACTUALLY HAPPENS? UM, I DON'T IMAGINE WE HAVE A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOR, YOU KNOW, THE ELLE TOWER. THANK YOU FOR THAT QUESTION. SO, UM, BY TYING THE, UH, PAGE TWO OF THE EX ZONING EXHIBIT IS THE IMAGE OF THE, UH, TREE DESIGN THAT IS EMULATING A MAGNOLIA TREE. AND BY TYING THAT TO THE ADOPTED ORDINANCE, IT ACTUALLY BECOMES A CODE ENFORCEMENT ISSUE IF THEY'RE NOT ABLE TO KEEP UP THE MAINTENANCE OF THE TREE BASED ON THE GRAPHIC PROVIDED, AS WELL AS THE OTHER STIPULATIONS INCLUDED AS PART OF THE ADOPTED ORDINANCE. SO IT WOULD THEN BECOME MANAGEABLE BY CODE ENFORCEMENT TO MAKE SURE THAT THE DESIGN OF THE TREE IS BEING FOLLOWED. OKAY. UM, ONE OTHER QUESTION. DID WE GIVE THEM, UM, THE STEAL DESIGN OR DID THEY COME UP WITH THE MAGNOLIA? THEY PROVIDED THE, UM, BROADLEAF, UH, DESIGN THAT EMULATES THE MAGNOLIA TREE TO US. UH, WE HAD PROVIDED SOME COMMENTS. UM, THE BRANCHES WERE ALREADY PRETTY CLOSE TO THE BASE, AND SO WE JUST ASKED THAT THEY EMULATE MORE OF A CONICAL SHAPE, BUT IT WAS VERY SMALL, LIKE IT WAS ALREADY DOING THAT. JUST A LITTLE BIT MORE, MR. BROSKI. SO QUESTION ON THE MAGNOLIA TREE DESIGN. UM, LAST TIME THE, UH, DEVELOP, UH, THE PEOPLE WERE HERE, THEY WERE SAYING THAT THERE WAS NO DESIGN, THERE WAS NO FAUX TREE DESIGN THAT WAS SOMETHING THAT WOULD BE SIMILAR TO THIS. HOW COMMON IS THE MAGNOLIA TREE DESIGN AS A FAUX TREE, UH, EXAMPLE FOR THESE, UH, KIND OF TOWERS? COMMISSIONER BRONSKI? UM, FIRST, FIRST VICE CHAIR BRONSKI, JUST MAKE SURE I'M UNDERSTANDING YOUR QUESTION. SO YOU'RE ASKING, SO PREVIOUSLY THEY HAD SAID THAT THERE WAS NO NATIVE TREE SPECIES THAT COULD BE USED FOR A STEALTH TOWER DESIGN. SO HOW IS THAT? IS THE MAGNOLIA TREE WELL, NO, NO, NO. SO OR HOW COMMON IS THE, THIS MAGNOLIA TREE DESIGN, UH, IN ITS USAGE AND, UH, IS IT, IS IT SOMETHING THAT'S NEW OR IS IT SOMETHING THAT THEY FOUND OR WERE ABLE TO DEVELOP OR THE, I BELIEVE THAT THE BROADLEAF DESIGN WAS ALREADY AVAILABLE IN THE APPLICANT CAN SPEAK MORE ON THAT. UM, HOWEVER, UM, YOU KNOW, I'M NOT SURE I'M EQUIPPED TO ANSWER THAT QUESTION. I THINK THAT QUESTION IS BETTER SUITED FOR THE APPLICANT'S NOW THAT I'M THINK THROUGH IT. THAT'S OKAY. I'M, I'M FRANKLY HAPPY THAT THEY FOUND SOMETHING THAT A, THE STAFF COULD APPROVE AND B, THAT WAS, UH, NATIVE TO US. I JUST WAS CURIOUS [00:15:01] THAT, UH, I I, I'M HAPPY THEY FOUND IT, SO I JUST WANTED, I WAS TRYING TO GATHER A LITTLE MORE INFORMATION FOR MYSELF. THAT'S A GOOD QUESTION, BUT THANK YOU MA'AM. OF COURSE. RIGHT. OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF? SEEING NONE, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. I THINK WE DO HAVE THE APPLICANT HERE. DOES ANYBODY HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? DO YOU HAVE A PRESENTATION FOR US OR ARE YOU JUST AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS? VERY, VERY BRIEF. MAINLY TO SHOW YOU THE SAMPLE BOARD. THAT IS SHANNON SHOWN YOU YOUR PICTURE SO YOU CAN ACTUALLY SEE WHAT THIS DESIGN IS GONNA LOOK LIKE. UH, AND I SHOULD NOTE, I WANNA SAY IT INTO THE MICROPHONE SO I DON'T SHOW YOU, BUT ONE OF THESE LEAVES IS ACTUALLY, HANG ON, WHY DON'T YOU START WITH, OH, I INTRODUCE YOURSELF. I'M, YES, YOU'RE ABSOLUTELY RIGHT. GOT AHEAD OF MYSELF. UH, UH, MY NAME IS MASON GRIFFIN AND I RESIDE AT 49 0 8 SPIKE GLASS DRIVE IN DALLAS, TEXAS. UM, AND I HAVE A MAGNOLIA TREE IN MY FRONT YARD AND ONE JUST AROUND THE CORNER. AND SO WHAT I'VE DONE IS LITERALLY THIS AFTERNOON TOOK A MAGNOLIA LEAF OFF OF ONE OF THE TREES. SO I'M GONNA WALK THIS SAMPLE BOARD AROUND SO YOU CAN SEE IT. IF YOU'D LIKE TO PASS IT AROUND, YOU'RE WELCOME TO, BUT I'LL SHOW YOU THE ONE THAT IS, THAT IS NOT FAUX, NOT HUMAN INITIATED. SO WHY DON'T YOU START WITH HOLDING IT UP RIGHT THERE. SO IT'LL BE ON CAMERA FOR ANYBODY THAT'S WATCHING AND INCLUDING. OKAY. SO WHICH ONE IS THE REAL ONE AND WHICH ONE IS THE, OKAY, SO THAT'S THE ONE OFF YOUR MAGNOLIA TREE. THIS IS THE ONE OFF OF, UH, OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD MAGNOLIA AND, UH, UH, YEAH, SO I CAN PASS THIS AROUND. OKAY. IF ANYONE WOULD LIKE TO SEE IT OR, I THINK WE CAN SEE IT. GREAT. I THINK IT'S MORE IMPORTANT THAT WE SEE IT FROM HERE, FRANKLY. OKAY, GREAT. YEAH, ABSOLUTELY. WELL, AGAIN, THAT'S THE, UH, THIS IS THE REAL MAGNOLIA AND THAT'S A, THAT'S A PRETTY GOOD MATCH. SO , THAT IS A PRETTY GOOD MATCH. ALRIGHT. YES, I'M, I'M AVAILABLE FOR, FOR, FOR, FOR ANY QUESTIONS THAT PEOPLE MIGHT HAVE. OKAY. SO QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT, COMMISSIONER, BRONSKI. UH, SO THE, UM, DO YOU FEEL CONFIDENT THAT THE UPKEEP AND MAINTENANCE TO MAINTAIN THIS, UM, IS SOMETHING THAT YOU GUYS CAN HANDLE? YES, ABSOLUTELY. ABSOLUTELY. JUST TO, JUST TO GO OVER A COUPLE OF MAINTENANCE ISSUES, USUALLY ON A CELL TOWER, UM, THE MAINTENANCE IS JUST THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE, OF THE TOWER OWNER, AND YOU MIGHT HAVE ONE PROPERTY OWNER THAT'S, THAT'S, THAT'S HOLDING THEM ACCOUNTABLE. IN THIS CASE, WE'VE GOT, UM, THE LEGACY ASSOCIATION, THE, THE, THE HOA, THE, THE CITY OF PLANO, THE PROPERTY OWNER, AS WELL AS ALL OF THE TENANTS COMING IN AND OUT OF THOSE OFFICE BUILDINGS EVERY DAY. AND SO I, I FEEL CERTAIN WE WILL BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE BY, BY FOLKS CALLING AND, AND, UH, AND LETTING US KNOW WHAT'S GOING ON. ADDITIONALLY, IN FACT, FRANKLY I DID NOT KNOW ABOUT MY OWN CLIENT, IS THEY ACTUALLY INSTALL CAMERAS WITHIN LOW DOWN WITHIN THE TREES, UH, SO THAT THEY CAN RESPOND APPROPRIATELY TO MAINTENANCE REQUESTS. THEY DON'T MONITOR THEM 24 7. SURE, THAT'D BE A WASTE OF RESOURCES, BUT IF SOMEONE HAS A COMPLAINT, THEY'RE ABLE TO JUST PUNCH UP THE, THE VIEW ON THEIR SCREEN LIKE A RING DEVICE AND DETERMINE WHAT TYPE OF RESPONSE IS NEEDED, IF ANY. UH, UH, IN ADDITION TO THAT, I JUST WANNA SAY THANK YOU FOR MAKING THE EFFORT TO, UM, A FIND SOMETHING THAT OUR STAFF COULD APPROVE, BUT MORE SO EVEN IS BEING ABLE TO FIND SOMETHING THAT IS NATIVE THAT DOES WORK FOR US. YES. SO THANK YOU. NO, I THINK THIS IS A, A GREAT SOLUTION. I WANNA COMPLIMENT, UM, UM, MR. BELL AND MS. CORREAL FOR THEIR ASSISTANCE THROUGH THIS WHOLE PROCESS AND WORKING WITH US TO, TO FIND A SOLUTION THAT I THINK, I THINK REALLY DOES, UH, IT'S, IT'S, IT'S THE BEST OUTCOME IN MY VIEW. SO PLANO DOES AN INCREDIBLE JOB IN MAKING SURE THAT WE HAVE THE BEST, UH, HIRES FOR THE, UH, OUR STAFF. MM-HMM . AND SO I ACTUALLY HAVE SAID WHAT YOU'VE SAID AND EVEN MORE SO I AGREE WITH YOU. THANK YOU. IT SHOWS IT, IT DEFINITELY HAVING WORKED WITH, WELL ANYWAY, IT SHOWS COMMISSIONER ALI, I WAS GONNA JAB MIKE A. LITTLE BIT, BUT I'LL RESERVE THAT . UM, BUT TO WHAT COMMISSIONER BRONSKI INITIALLY ASKED MS. CORREAL YEAH. WAS THIS OFF THE MARKET THAT YOU BOUGHT IT? NO. OR DID YOU CUSTOMIZE IT SPECIFICALLY? THIS WAS, THIS WAS ON THE MARKET AND I THINK, 'CAUSE OF COURSE I WAS HERE TWO OR THREE MONTHS AGO TALKING ABOUT THIS. I THINK WHAT I WAS REFERRING TO AT THE TIME IS THAT EVEN THIS TREE, IF YOU WERE TO LOOK AT COMPARABLE TEXAS NATIVE TREES, I'M JUST GONNA CONFESS SOMETHING HERE, THEY'RE NOT THAT NARROW NATIVE TREES. AND SO WHAT I WAS SPEAKING OF IS A TRUE 95 FOOT TREE IN NORTH TEXAS IS GONNA HAVE A WIDTH THAT IS, THAT IS, YOU KNOW, IS WIDE AS THIS ROOM AT THE BASE. AND THIS WILL NOT HAVE THAT, UM, THIS WILL BE CERTAINLY WIDER THAN THE EUCALYPTUS DESIGN. SO I DO THINK IT'S DEFINITELY BETTER, BUT, BUT, UM, UM, ANYWAY, SO IT'S, IT'S A BUT IT'S A COMPARABLE YES. IT'S, IT'S, IT'LL BE A SCHEME OF IT'S COMPARABLE ENOUGH CLOSE AS, AS CLOSE AS WE REALLY CAN GET THAT WORKS. YEP. THANKS. YEP. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER LEY. AND WHAT ABOUT THE DENSITY OF THE LEAVES? ARE YOU GONNA PUT IT IN THE SPEC? YOU'RE LIKE, IT'S BECAUSE WE'RE GONNA HAVE PERMIT RESTRICTION FOR ME. I APOLOGIZE. I, I'M SORRY. I'M SORRY. I AM A LITTLE BIT, UH, UNDER THE WEATHER. NO, NO. YEAH, SO YOU'RE LIKE, WHAT'S THE DENSITY OF THE LEAVES? YOU'RE LIKE, ARE YOU GONNA ATTACH IT? LIKE, ARE YOU GONNA PROVIDE A SPEC FOR HOW [00:20:01] MANY LEAVES ARE GONNA BE, BECAUSE THERE IS ONE ON 18TH STREET AND IT IS VERY SPARSE. SO HOW DO WE, HOW ARE YOU GONNA CONTROL THE DENSITY OF THE LEAVES? SO IT'S COVERS EVERYTHING AND IT LOOKS NICE. SURE. MS. CORRIO POINTED THAT OUT TO ME AND SAID THIS, THAT'S THE, THAT THAT TREE, THAT STRUCTURE IS THE SOURCE OF A LOT OF THE CONCERNS HERE. AND I LOOKED AT IT ON GOOGLE MAPS AND I, I SAID, I, I CAN'T BELIEVE WHAT I'M LOOKING AT. UM, THAT'S A, WELL, ANYWAY, , THAT, THAT , UM, I CAN'T PROMISE IT WILL LOOK PRECISELY LIKE THIS IMAGE MM-HMM . UM, BUT IT'LL, IT'LL SUBSTANTIVELY LOOK LIKE, LOOK LIKE THIS IN TERMS OF LEAF DENSITY. MM-HMM . AND ONE OF THE REQUIREMENTS THAT, THAT, THAT WILL BE UNDER IS THAT THE ANTENNAS THEMSELVES, AND THERE'LL BE ROOM FOR THREE CARRIERS, ACTUALLY. THERE'LL BE ROOM FOR FOUR SETS OF ANTENNAS, THE THREE MAJOR CARRIERS, AND THEN A FOURTH SPOT SHOULD ANOTHER, UH, YOU KNOW, DISH ENTER THE MARKET OR ONE OF THE OTHER CARRIERS WANT ANOTHER SET OF ANTENNAS. THOSE ANTENNAS WILL BE, UH, TOTALLY COVERED. NOW AGAIN, THEY'RE BRANCHES AND LIMBS ON A TREE. SO IF YOU WERE TO STARE AT IT LONG ENOUGH, YOU COULD, YOU COULD FIND YOUR WAY THROUGH VISUALLY AND SEE THEM. BUT, BUT, BUT THEY WON'T BE STICKING OUTSIDE OF THE LEAVES AND BRANCHES. SO IT'S, YEAH, IT'S GONNA BE COVERED. YES, MA'AM. THANK YOU. I HOPE, DOES THAT ANSWER YOUR QUESTION? YES. YEAH. YEAH. THANKS. OKAY, GREAT. BUT NOTHING LIKE THAT OTHER TREE, I WANT TO EMPHASIZE THAT. SO EVERY TIME I SEE US, I, OH GOSH, THIS IS THE TREE THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT, . IT'S AT THE END OF OUR STREET. I LOOK AT IT ALL THE TIME. YEAH. . OKAY. OTHER COM. OTHER QUESTIONS OF THE APPLICANT? NOBODY. OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR COMING TO SEE US AGAIN. ABSOLUTELY. WELL, I KNOW YOU DIDN'T WANNA SEE ME AGAIN, , WE THOUGHT WE HAD A GOOD STORY TO TELL, SO THANK YOU FOR CONTINUING TO WORK WITH US ON IT. APPRECIATE IT. WE APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. ALRIGHT, DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER SPEAKERS REGISTERED? NO, SIR. OKAY. I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. UM, COMMISSIONER BRUNO, I MOVE, WE, UH, APPROVE ITEM TWO AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF COMMISSIONER BROSKY SECOND. ALRIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. OH, HANG ON A SECOND. COMMISSIONER LINGENFELTER, I DIDN'T ASK YOU IF YOU HAD ANY QUESTIONS ON THIS ONE. I APOLOGIZE. IT'S ALL RIGHT. I WAS JUST GONNA MAKE A MOTION, BUT THEY BEAT ME TO IT, SO I, BUT I WILL SAY, AYE. , GLAD TO SEE YOU, . ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND, PLEASE VOTE. COMMISSIONER LINGENFELTER. NO, I SAID AYE. OH, YOU SAID I I THOUGHT YOU JUST SAID AYE . NO, NO, NO. AYE. AS IN. OKAY, GOTCHA. AYE I. ALL RIGHT. YOUR VOTE IS RECORDED. THANK YOU. MOTION PASSES EIGHT TO ZERO. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU FOR CONTINUING TO WORK WITH US ON IT. ALL RIGHT. UM, ITEMS THREE [Items 3A. (JK) & 3B. (JK) ] A AND THREE B. IF YOU'D READ THEM TOGETHER PLEASE. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER THREE, A REQUEST TO REZONE 99 ACRES OF LAND OUT OF THE MARIA C VELO SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 9 35 IN THE JACOB COOK SURVEY, ABSTRACT NUMBER 180 9 LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LEGACY DRIVE IN PARKWOOD BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF PLANO, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS FROM PLAN DEVELOPMENT 62. COMMERCIAL EMPLOYMENT TO COMMERCIAL EMPLOYMENT. THE APPLICANT IS TRQ PLANO, LLC. THIS ITEM IS FOR LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATION. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER THREE B, A REQUEST TO WAIVE THE TWO YEAR WAITING PERIOD FOR INITIATION WITHIN THE NEXT 12 MONTHS OF REZONING. ONE OR MORE PORTIONS OF THE 99 ACRE PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LEGACY DRIVE IN PARKWOOD BOULEVARD ZONE PLAN DEVELOPMENT 62 COMMERCIAL EMPLOYMENT. THE APPLICANT IS TRQ PLANO, LLC. THIS ITEM IS FOR LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU. UH, GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS JOHN KIM, SENIOR PLANNER WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. UH, ON THE SCREEN IN YELLOW, YOU'LL SEE THE PROPERTY BOUNDARIES OF THE ZONING CASE. IT'S LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF PARKWOOD BOULEVARD AND LEGACY DRIVE. ON THIS SLIDE HERE, YOU'LL SEE THE SURROUNDING ZONING TO THE NORTHEAST AND SOUTH IS ALL COMMERCIAL EMPLOYMENT. AND THEN TO THE WEST IS PD 65, COMMERCIAL BUSINESS ONE. SO TO TALK ABOUT THE SITE, UM, THE PROPERTY WAS ANNEXED AND ZONED TO COMMERCIAL EMPLOYMENT IN 1980 AND LATER IN 1992, IT WAS DEVELOPED AS THE HEADQUARTERS FOR ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS EDS. UM, AFTER MANY YEARS IN PLANO IN 2018, THE OFFICES CLOSED AND THE PROPERTY HAS REMAINED VACANT SINCE THAT TIME. UH, IN 2023, THE APPLICANT BROUGHT FORWARD A ZONING CASE, UM, THAT ESTABLISHED PD 62 CE. UM, THAT PD WAS DESIGNED TO FACILITATE A MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT ANCHORED BY LIFE SCIENCE MANUFACTURING USES. THE PD WAS TAILORED FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AT THAT TIME OF ITS CREATION. UM, JUST TO DESCRIBE THE PD A LITTLE FURTHER, UH, THERE [00:25:01] WAS A, AN ADOPTED OPEN SPACE WITH THAT ZONING CASE ALONG WITH THE MODIFIED STANDARDS AND USES ASSOCIATED WITH WITH THE STIPULATIONS. UM, THE ASSOCIATED PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN WITH THE CASE EXPIRED ON NOVEMBER 7TH, 2025, AND THE APPLICANT HAS LET US KNOW THAT THEY'RE NO LONGER PURSUING THAT DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THAT ZONING CASE. AND ON THE SCREEN TO THE RIGHT, YOU'LL SEE THE ADOPTED OPEN SPACE PLAN WITH THE ZONING CASE THERE. UM, SO FOR THE REQUEST FOR ITEM THREE A, UH, IT IS TO REPEAL THE EXISTING PLAN DEVELOPMENT 62 COMMERCIAL EMPLOYMENT AND ZONING AND RETURN THE PROPERTY TO ITS ORIGINAL BASE PROPERTY ZONING OF COMMERCIAL EMPLOYMENT. UH, BECAUSE THE APPLICANT IS NO LONGER PURSUING THE ASSOCIATED DEVELOPMENT AND THE ORIGINAL PLANS HAVE EXPIRED, STAFF IS IN SUPPORT OF THE REQUEST APPROVING. THE REQUEST WILL ALLOW THE SITE TO BE DEVELOPED PER TYPICAL CE STANDARDS. UM, THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED WITHIN THE EMPLOYMENT CENTER'S FUTURE LAND USE AREA OR EM, AND IT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE DESCRIPTION AND PRIORITIES, THE MIX OF USES AND CHARACTER DEFINING ELEMENTS OF THE EM DASHBOARD. SORRY, I WAS BEHIND A SCREEN THERE. UH, WE HAVE RECEIVED, UM, TWO RESPONSES, UM, WITHIN 200 FEET. AND THEN ON THE MAP THERE IS AN ADDITIONAL RESPONSE THAT WAS NOT MAPPED. SO WE DO HAVE A TOTAL OF THREE. UM, JUST TO UPDATE, UH, CITYWIDE WE HAVE RECEIVED SEVEN. AND THEN THE ADDITIONAL ONE THAT I MENTIONED, IF ITEM THREE A IS APPROVED, THIS WOULD TRIGGER THE TWO YEAR WAITING PERIOD FOR FUTURE REZONING OF THE PROPERTY AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 4.8 HUNDRED OF THESE ZONING ORDINANCE. UH, THESE, WAIT, THESE WAITING PERIODS PREVENT SUCCESSIVE APPLICATIONS, UM, BY THE OWNER WHERE AN APPLICANT CAN EXHAUST PARTICIPATION BY SURROUNDING, UH, PROPERTY OWNERS. UM, IF ITEM THREE A IS APPROVED, THE REQUEST FOR ITEM THREE B IS TO REQUEST TO WAIVE THE TWO YEAR WAITING PERIOD AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 4.8 HUNDRED OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, UM, FOR ZONING CASES SUBMITTED BEFORE FEBRUARY 2ND, 2027. UM, SO THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THIS AND UH, THIS WOULD ALLOW MULTIPLE ZONING CASES TO BE SUBMITTED ON THE PROPERTY AND IT CAN COVER DIFFERENT ACREAGES AT DIFFERENT TIMES. SO IT CAN BE LIKE A 40 ACRE PD AND THEN A, UH, THE REMAINING ACREAGE PD. UM, SO THAT CAN BE ALLOWED AND THIS WILL ALLOW THE, THE APPLICANT TO HAVE, UH, FLEXIBILITY WITH FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN OF THE SITE, UH, FOR THE TWO YEAR WAIVER. UH, SUBSECTION FOUR POINT 800.2 ALLOWS FOR WAIVER FOR, ALLOWS FOR THE WAIVER OF THE TWO YEAR WAITING PERIOD IF DETERMINED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, THAT THERE ARE SUBSTANTIVE REASONS TO PERMIT WAIVING THE TIME PERIOD. SUBSTANTIVE REASONS FOR WAIVING TWO YEAR PERIOD INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO CORRECTION OF AN ERROR, A CHANGE OF CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE PROPERTY, WHICH WAS NOT KNOWN AT THE TIME OF ZONING, OR A CHANGE IN PUBLIC PLANS OR POLICIES THAT AFFECTS THE PROPERTY. UM, ITEM THREE A IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED. ITEM THREE B IS RECOMMENDED THAT A WAIVER OF THE TWO YEAR WAITING PERIOD FOR CASES SUBMITTED BEFORE FEBRUARY 2ND, 2027, UH, BE GRANTED SUBJECT TO CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF ZONING CASE 20 25 0, 23. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. ALRIGHT, THANK YOU. UM, JUST TO OBSERVATION, JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT, UH, JUST TO KIND OF LEAD OFF, IS THAT BY BASICALLY REPEALING THIS PD, WE'RE PUTTING THIS PROPERTY BACK THE WAY IT WAS BEFORE THE PD AND AND THAT WILL BE 100% CONSISTENT WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AT THAT TIME, CORRECT? YES, CORRECT. OKAY. SO IT'S REALLY KIND OF A REVITALIZATION OF THE PURPOSE OF THAT PROPERTY THE WAY IT WAS ORIGINALLY INTENDED IN THE COMP PLAN? CORRECT. OKAY, GREAT. THANK YOU. UM, COMMISSIONER TONG. THANK YOU MR. CHAIRMAN. UM, I JUST WANNA GO BACK TO THAT THREE REASONS FOR GRANTING THE WAIVER. SO WHICH ONE ARE WE USING RIGHT NOW? SO, UM, THE REASONS CAN INCLUDE THESE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO IT. OH. AND SO THERE ARE, YOU KNOW, OTHER FACTORS THAT THE COMMISSION CAN DETERMINE AS PART OF THIS REQUEST. SO THE STAFF IS SUPPORTING THIS CHANGE OR THE WAIVER IS BASED ON A DIFFERENT REASON FROM THESE THREE, IS THAT CORRECT? YEAH, I JUST DON'T KNOW WHICH ONE THAT YOU ARE BASING THE DECISION UPON. YEAH, SO STAFF DOES FEEL, YOU KNOW, SINCE IT IS REVERTING TO THE ORIGINAL ZONING AND THE APPLICANT IS NO LONGER [00:30:01] PURSUING THE PRIOR DEVELOPMENT THAT WAS ASSOCIATED WITH THE ZONING CASE, THAT IT WAS APPROPRIATE FOR THIS UH, REQUEST. OKAY. THANK YOU MR. OLLIE. UM, LEMME SAY THAT BACK TO YOU 'CAUSE I LOOKED AT IT AS MORE REASON NUMBER TWO, THAT THERE IS A CHANGE OF CONDITIONS AFFECTING THE PROPERTY, WHICH HAS NOT BEEN, FOR LACK OF A BETTER WORD, FULLY FLESHED OUT AT THE TIME OF THE ZONING, WHICH IS NOW, UH, IS THAT A FAIR WAY TO THINK ABOUT IT? YEAH, I THINK IT'S ALSO PARTIALLY ABOUT CONDITION TWO IN THAT THEY COULD DO THIS IN ONE STEP, BUT DUE TO THEIR DEVELOPMENT TIMELINES, THEY'RE, THEY'RE BEING UPFRONT THAT THEY NEEDED A TWO STEP PROCESS TO DO THAT. AND SO STEP ONE IS THREE A AND STEP TWO WOULD BE A SUBSEQUENT ZONING CASE TO COME BACK FOR FUTURE PLANS. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU COMMISSIONER BURNOFF. THANK YOU. NOW I ALSO AM LOOKING AT UM, GROUND NUMBER TWO, CHANGE OF CONDITIONS IN THAT THE, UH, THE PROPERTY OWNER IS NO LONGER PURSUING THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED PLAN DEVELOPMENT. UM, I HAPPEN TO HAVE READ IN THE NEWSPAPER THAT THE REASON THEY'RE NOT PURSUING IT IS FOR THE REPEAL OF CERTAIN FEDERAL SUBSIDIES, WHICH WOULD'VE MADE THE PROJECT POSSIBLE. COMMISSIONER BENDER. THANK YOU CHAIRMAN. UH, I AGREE WITH THE CHAIRMAN'S COMMENTS THAT, UM, APPROVING THIS BASICALLY PUTS THE PROPERTY BACK THE WAY IT WAS AND ISN'T FULL CON CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. ALRIGHT, OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ALRIGHT, SEEING NONE, UH, WE DO HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING. LET ME OPEN A PUBLIC HEARING AND I THINK THE APPLICANT IS HERE IF WE HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT. DOES ANYBODY HAVE QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? NOBODY DOES THE, DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO MAKE A PRESENTATION OR ARE Y'ALL JUST HERE FOR, FOR QUESTIONS? OKAY, I'M SORRY. OKAY. UH, COMMISSIONER LOLLY, YOU DO HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT? FOR THE APPLICANT? OKAY. CAN SOMEBODY, THE STAFF IF THE APPLICANT COME FORWARD PLEASE, IF YOU'D INTRODUCE YOURSELF PLEASE. YOU NEED COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME'S ERIC DANIELSON REPRESENTED BY TRQ PLANO, LLC THIS EVENING, UH, TO, I'M REPRESENTING HAPPY TO STAND FORTH THROUGH ANY QUESTIONS IN REGARDS TO THE PRESENTATION THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY MADE? YES, YOU, SO MY QUESTION IS WHAT'S, UH, YOU KNOW, LIKE YOU'RE PLANNING TO DO WITH THE LAND THAT'S, UM, THE PD DOES NOT ALLOW YOU TO DO, CAN WE ASK THIS QUESTION? IS IT LEGAL TO ASK ? NO. WELL, SINCE WE'RE NOT CONSIDERING A SITE PLAN, THIS IS JUST A STRAIGHT ZONING CASE. I THINK WE'VE GOT, WE NEED TO FOCUS JUST ON THE ZONING, NOT ON THE THE, SO THE PLANS WE CAN ASK. SO YEAH, UH, I I THINK OUR FOCUS TONIGHT NEEDS TO BE JUST ON THE LAND USE IF WE CAN ON THE LAND USE. YEAH. I FEEL CERTAIN HE'LL BE BACK OR SOMEBODY. YEAH, BUT I MEAN, YOU KNOW, LIKE MY QUESTION IS WHY IS, YOU KNOW, LIKE WHAT'S THE REASON FOR THE REZONING? LET'S PUT IT THIS WAY. YEAH. IF I COULD ADD, THERE IS A PLAN ATTACHED TO THE ORDINANCE AND THEY'RE, THEY'RE COMMITTED TO THAT PLAN IN THE ORDINANCE. SO IF THE PD IS NOW OBSOLETE, IT MAKES SENSE TO REMOVE THAT PLAN FROM OH, OKAY. FROM THE PD. YEAH, THAT MAKES SENSE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU AGAIN, THE CITY STAFF'S BEEN EXCELLENT TO WORK WITH. WE CAN DEFINITELY CONTINUE TO DO THAT HERE AS WE MOVE FORWARD. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? NOBODY SEEING NONE. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU CHAIRMAN. I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. OH, DO WE HAVE ANY OTHER SPEAKERS? NO, SIR. OKAY. I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING RESERVE COMMITTEE TO COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION. UH, COMMISSIONER BRONSKI. SO I'D LIKE TO, UH, FIRST SAY THAT, UH, I'M HAPPY THAT WE HAVE WAITED AND THAT WE ARE PUTTING THIS BACK TO WHERE IT BELONGS BECAUSE I BELIEVE THAT THERE ARE STILL OPPORTUNITIES FOR US TO HAVE, UM, CAMPUS FACILITIES LIKE THIS FOR CUSTOMER OR FOR OUR BUSINESSES. AND SO I'M VERY HAPPY THAT, UH, WE'RE GOING THIS DIRECTION AND BRINGING THIS BACK INTO CONFORMANCE WITH, UH, OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. UH, I'M IN COMPLETE AGREEMENT WITH, SO I MOVE, HANG, HANG ON, HANG ON. WE HAVE SOME OTHER PEOPLE THAT WANT TO TALK, SO JUST HOLD, HOLD YOUR THOUGHTS. YEAH. OKAY. UM, I, I, LET ME ASK COMMISSIONER LINCOLNFELTER 'CAUSE HE HAD HIS HAND UP WHEN YOU STARTED TALKING. LEMME MAKE SURE HE, HE GETS HIS CHANCE HERE. COMMISSIONER. OH, I WAS ACTUALLY JUST GONNA MAKE A MOTION. UH, BUT I CAN, I CAN COME BEHIND. OKAY, SO THEN I'LL, AND THEN COMMISSIONER OLLIE, DID YOU HAVE COMMENTS OR WERE YOU INTERESTED IN A MOTION? COMMENT ON THAT. OKAY. SO YOU WANNA WAIT TILL AFTER THE MOTION THEN? UM, OKAY. COMMISSIONER OLLIE. UM, IT IS JUST MORE, I SEE LESS AS REVERTING BACK TO COMMERCIAL EMPLOYMENT OR WHAT HAVE YOU, BUT MORE, GIVEN THE CHANGE OF CONDITIONS, WE ARE RESETTING THE SLATE [00:35:01] AND WHEN THEY COME BACK WITH THE NEW PD OR WHATEVER ELSE THEY WANT TO COME BACK WITH, WE WILL THEN HAVE DISCUSSIONS ON WHETHER THAT'S APPLICABLE, UM, FOR PLATO AND FOR THE SITE. THANK YOU. I AGREE WITH YOU. OKAY. NOW, COMMISSIONER BRONSKI, I MOVE, WE APPROVE AGENDA ITEM THREE A AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF AND COMMISSIONER LINGENFELTER. I WILL SECOND THAT MOTION. ALRIGHT, SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. UM, EVERYBODY PLEASE VOTE. UH, COMMISSIONER LINCOLNFELTER? YES. AYE. MOTION PASSES. EIGHT TO ZERO. ALRIGHT, UM, ITEM THREE B UH, COMMISSIONER BRONSKI, I MOVE, WE APPROVE AGENDA ITEM THREE B AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF AND COMMISSIONER ALI. I'LL SECOND. ALL RIGHT, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND ON ITEM THREE B, PLEASE VOTE. COMMISSIONER LINGENFELTER. AYE. MOTION PASSES EIGHT TO ZERO. THANK Y'ALL VERY MUCH FOR BEING HERE. WE LOOK FORWARD TO SEEING YOU BACK VERY SOON. ALRIGHT. UH, DO YOU HAVE ANOTHER BUSINESS BEFORE THE COMMISSION THIS EVENING? NO SIR. ALRIGHT, WE STAND ADJOURNED AT 6:36 PM. * This transcript was created by voice-to-text technology. The transcript has not been edited for errors or omissions, it is for reference only and is not the official minutes of the meeting.