[00:00:03] WELCOME TO THE FEBRUARY 17TH MEETING OF THE PLANO PLANNING AND ZONING. RECORDING IN PROGRESS. OKAY. WELCOME TO THE FEBRUARY 17TH MEETING OF THE PLANO PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION. [CALL TO ORDER] I'LL CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER AT 6:00. IF ALL PLEASE RISE AND JOIN ME IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. THANK YOU. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING EVERYBODY. [CONSENT AGENDA] IF WE MOVE TO THE CONSENT AGENDA, PLEASE. CONSENT AGENDA. THE CONSENT AGENDA WILL BE ACTED UPON IN ONE MOTION AND CONTAINS ITEMS THAT ARE ROUTINE AND TYPICALLY NONCONTROVERSIAL. ITEMS MAY BE REMOVED FROM THIS AGENDA FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION BY COMMISSIONERS OR STAFF. COMMISSION DOES ANYBODY WISH TO PULL AN ITEM FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA? COMMISSIONER BRONSKY. I MOVE, WE APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS SUBMITTED. COMMISSIONER LINGENFELTER. AND I SECOND. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL IN FAVOR PLEASE VOTE. MOTION PASSES 8 TO 0. ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION. [1. (JK) Public Hearing – Replat & Revised Site Plan: Willow Bend Polo Estates Phase B, Block B, Lot 16R – One Patio Home lot on 0.2 acre located on the west side Old Westbury Lane, 190 feet north of Turtle Creek Drive. Zoned Planned Development-423-Patio Home. Projects #R2025-003 & #RSP2025-005. Applicant: Jeffrey & Cynthia Scherbarth. (Administrative consideration)] ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION. PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. UNLESS INSTRUCTED OTHERWISE BY THE CHAIR, SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED IN THE ORDER REGISTRATIONS ARE RECEIVED. APPLICANTS ARE LIMITED TO A TOTAL OF 15 MINUTES OF PRESENTATION TIME, WITH A 5 MINUTE REBUTTAL IF NEEDED. REMAINING SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO 30 TOTAL MINUTES OF TESTIMONY TIME, WITH 3 MINUTES ASSIGNED PER SPEAKER. THE PRESIDING OFFICER MAY MODIFY THESE TIMES AS DEEMED NECESSARY. ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION. ITEMS MUST BE APPROVED IF THEY MEET CITY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATION ITEMS ARE MORE DISCRETIONARY EXCEPT AS CONSTRAINED BY LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS. CAN YOU READ ITEM NUMBER ONE, PLEASE. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER ONE WILLOW BEND POLO ESTATES PHASE B, BLOCK B, LOT 16R. A ONE PATIO HOME LOT ON 0.2 ACRE, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF OLD WESTBURY LANE, 190FT NORTH OF TURTLE CREEK DRIVE. ZONED PLANNED DEVELOPMENT FOR TWO THREE PATIO HOME. APPLICANTS ARE JEFFREY AND CYNTHIA SCHERBARTH. THIS ITEM IS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS JOHN KIM, PLANNER WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. OH, HERE'S THE LOCATOR FOR THE SITE. AND HERE IS THE REPLAT. AND HERE IS THE REVISED SITE PLAN. THE ITEMS ARE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED. I'M AVAILABLE FOR QUESTIONS. I HAVE ONE QUESTION. HOW MANY OF THESE DO WE HAVE LEFT? I'M NOT SURE. THAT IS. THAT WOULD BE THAT WOULD BE FOUR. FOUR. OKAY. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONERS, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? COMMISSIONER BENDER? I WAS GOING TO MAKE A MOTION. OH. LET ME OH, LET ME LET ME GET THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARING STUFF FIRST. COMMISSIONER OLLEY, SO LIKE SO THE REPLAT IS JUST TO DETERMINE THE SETBACKS, RIGHT? CORRECT. AND WHEN WE WENT TO THIS, LIKE TO THE NORTH TEXAS PLANNING EVENT, THEY TOLD US THAT THE, YOU KNOW, LIKE, THE SETBACKS, THEY DON'T HAVE TO BE PART OF THE PLATS. SO IS THAT SOMETHING THAT YOU, YOU KNOW, LIKE YOU MIGHT CONSIDER? SO I BELIEVE THERE IS A SPECIAL REQUIREMENT FOR THE PATIO HOME DISTRICT. AND SO THAT'S WHY WE REQUIRE THE PLATS TO HAVE THE BUILDING LINES SET ON THERE. OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OF STAFF? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. THANK YOU. DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM? THERE ARE NONE. ALL RIGHT. I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL RIGHT. COMMISSIONERS. MR. BENDER. COMMISSIONER. YES. MOTION TO APPROVE. COMMISSIONER BRONSKY. SECOND. SECOND. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. PLEASE VOTE. THAT MOTION PASSES 8 TO 0. ITEM NUMBER TWO. [2. (DW) Public Hearing – Zoning Case 2024-026: Request to amend Planned Development65-Central Business-1 to modify open space and signage development standards on 275.1 acres located at the northeast corner of Legacy Drive and Communications Parkway within the Dallas North Tollway Overlay District. Project #ZC2024-026. Tabled January 21, 2025. Petitioner: Legacy West Investors, LP. (Request to table to March 3, 2025)] AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TWO. REQUEST TO AMEND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 65 CENTRAL BUSINESS -1 T O MODIFY OPEN SPACE AND SIGNAGE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS ON 275.1 ACRES, LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF LEGACY DRIVE AND COMMUNICATIONS PARKWAY WITHIN THE DALLAS NORTH TOLLWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT. [00:05:04] THE PETITIONER IS LEGACY WEST INVESTORS, L.P.. THIS ITEM IS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION. GOOD EVENING COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS DESTINY WOODS, PLANNER WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO TABLE THIS ITEM UNTIL THE MARCH 3RD, 2025 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING TO CONTINUE TO REFINE THE ZONING REQUEST. I'M AVAILABLE FOR ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. IF YOU WOULD JUST I KNOW WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THIS IN THE PRE SESSION, BUT IF YOU WOULD JUST FOR THE RECORD TELL US WHY THEY'RE ASKING TO POSTPONE. YES. SO THE APPLICANT HAS ALSO REQUESTED A VARIANCE FROM THE FIRE CODE. AND THAT VARIANCE IS STILL UNDER REVIEW AT THIS TIME. SO IT'S LINKED TO THIS ZONING CASE. ALL RIGHT. COMMISSIONER BROUNOFF. THANK YOU. MY QUESTION FOR STAFF IS IF WE ASSUMING THAT WE WOULD POSTPONE THIS AND IT IS THE THIRD POSTPONEMENT, BUT NOT AT THE REQUEST OF THE APPLICANT. WOULD IT BE APPROPRIATE TO INCLUDE IN A MOTION A PROVISION TO WAIVE THE RE NOTICE FEE? SO THERE IS NO IN ORDER TO TABLE. ARE YOU ASKING IN ORDER FOR THEM TO TABLE IT? A NOTICE FEE TO TABLE. WE JUST WE JUST CHANGED OUR PROCEDURE A COUPLE OF MEETINGS AGO THAT ON THE THIRD POSTPONEMENT, THE APPLICANT WOULD BE REQUIRED TO PAY TO PAY A RE NOTICE FEE BECAUSE THE POSTPONEMENT WOULD BE INDEFINITE. YEAH. WE JUST WE ACTUALLY DIDN'T CHANGE OUR POLICY. WHAT WE SAID IS AFTER THE SECOND, WE WOULD HAVE THE OPTION OF POSTPONING INDEFINITELY. I SEE. IF WE POSTPONE INDEFINITELY THEN THEY HAVE TO PAY A RE NOTICE FEE. SO WE HAVE THE OPTION OF POSTPONING INDEFINITELY AT THE THIRD TABLING BUT WE DON'T HAVE TO. BUT WE CAN STILL POSTPONE TO A DEFINITE? YES. IT IS STILL IN OUR DISCRETION TO POSTPONE TO A DEFINITE DATE. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THAT WAS COMMISSIONER BROUNOFF. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE, I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKERS REGISTERED FOR THIS ITEM? THE APPLICANT IS AVAILABLE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AS WELL AS ONE REGISTERED SPEAKER BILL LISLE FROM LISLE, INC.. IS MR. LISLE HERE TONIGHT? I DON'T SEE HIM IN THE AUDIENCE. ALL RIGHT. WELL, THEN I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. COMMISSION. COMMISSIONER LINGENFELTER. I MOVE THAT WE GRANT THE TABLING TO THE MARCH 3RD MEETING, AS REQUESTED. COMMISSIONER OLLEY. I'LL SECOND. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER COMMENTS? ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. PLEASE VOTE. THAT MOTION PASSES 8 TO 0. ALL RIGHT. ITEM THREE. [3. (MC) Discussion and Action – Reinstatement of Approval Request – Site Plan: NG Ranch Addition, Block A, Lot 1 – Request to reinstate approval of a site plan for vehicle leasing and renting on one lot on 0.9 acre located at the southeast corner of U.S. Highway 75 and 11th Street. Zoned Corridor Commercial with Specific Use Permit No. 389 for Used Car Dealer. Project #SP2022-036. Applicant: New Griffin Ranch, Ltd. (Legislative consideration)] ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION. NON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL PERMIT LIMITED PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA NOT POSTED FOR A PUBLIC HEARING. THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL ESTABLISH TIME LIMITS BASED UPON THE NUMBER OF SPEAKER REQUESTS, LENGTH OF THE AGENDA AND TO ENSURE MEETING EFFICIENCY, AND MAY INCLUDE A TOTAL A TOTAL TIME LIMIT. AGENDA ITEM NUMBER THREE. KING RANCH ADDITION BLOCK A, LOT ONE. REQUEST TO REINSTATE APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR VEHICLE LEASING AND RENTING ON ONE LOT ON 0.9 ACRE LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF U.S. HIGHWAY 75 AND 11TH STREET. ZONED CORRIDORS COMMERCIAL WITH SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER 389 FOR USED CAR DEALER. THE APPLICANT IS NEW GRIFFIN RANCH LTD. THIS ITEM IS FOR LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING COMMISSION MOLLY CORYELL, SENIOR PLANNER WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT. THE PURPOSE OF THIS ITEM IS TO REINSTATE APPROVAL OF A SITE PLAN FOR A VEHICLE LEASING AND RENTING. USE LOCATED HERE AT THE CORNER OF 11TH STREET AND NORTHWEST HIGHWAY. PER SECTION 3.700 OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE, THE APPLICANT IS ALLOWED TO REQUEST TO REINSTATE THE PLAN FOR AN ADDITIONAL TWO YEARS. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING TO REINSTATE THIS PLAN, TO FINALIZE THE CIVIL DRAWINGS, OBTAINED BUILDING PERMITS, AND BEGIN CONSTRUCTION. HERE IS THE ORIGINALLY APPROVED SITE PLAN ON DECEMBER 20TH , 2022. IN DETERMINING WHETHER TO GRANT SUCH A REQUEST, THE COMMISSION SHOULD CONSIDER THE REASON FOR THE LAPSE. IN THIS CASE, THE APPLICANT PROVIDED A LETTER, HOWEVER IT IS DUE TO THE OBTAINING OF THE BUILDING PERMITS AND FINALIZING CIVIL DRAWINGS. THE SECOND IS THE PROPERTY OWNERS ABILITY TO COMPLY WITH ANY CONDITIONS OF THE APPROVAL, AND NO CONDITIONS WERE PLACED ON THE PLAN WITH THE PREVIOUS APPROVAL. [00:10:05] AND THE EXTENT IN WHICH NEWLY ADOPTED REGULATIONS SHALL APPLY TO THE PLAN. THE SITE IS SHOWING FIVE FOOT SIDEWALKS HOWEVER, UNDER OUR NEW STREET DESIGN STANDARDS, THE SITE WOULD BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE SEVEN FOOT SIDEWALKS WITH ON STREET PARKING. THERE ARE NO OTHER RELEVANT REGULATIONS IN WHICH THIS SITE PLAN IS NOT CONFORMING WITH TODAY. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE REINSTATEMENT REQUEST AND I AM AVAILABLE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. COMMISSION QUESTIONS FOR STAFF, COMMISSIONER BROUNOFF. OKAY. THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN. JUST TO CLARIFY THIS, THIS PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF U.S. HIGHWAY 75 AND 11TH STREET. RIGHT? YES. WHICH HIGHWAY DID I SAY? YOU SAID NORTHWEST HIGHWAY. MY APOLOGIES. YES, I MEANT HIGHWAY 75 AND 11TH STREET. THANK YOU. NORTHWEST HIGHWAY IS IN DALLAS? YES. I WAS ALREADY THINKING OF MY DRIVE HOME. I'M SO SORRY. OKAY, IF WE APPROVE THE REQUEST TO REINSTATE, HOW MUCH TIME WOULD THEY HAVE? AN ADDITIONAL TWO YEARS. IS THAT TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT OR JUST TO MAKE PROGRESS ON IT? THAT IS TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. COMMISSIONER OLLEY . QUESTION ON THE NEW REGULATIONS FOR OUR STREETS WITH. SO THE WOULD THEY HAVE TO RESUBMIT A SITE PLAN THAT SHOWS THAT ADDITIONAL STREET WIDTH? OKAY. AND THE APPLICANT IS AWARE OF THAT? YES. THE APPLICANT IS AWARE OF THE DISCREPANCIES WITH OUR CURRENT STREET DESIGN STANDARDS AND THE PREVIOUS THOROUGHFARE STANDARDS, RULES AND REGULATIONS. OKAY. THANK YOU. COMMISSIONER OLLEY. SO I HAVE TWO QUESTIONS. ONE OF THEM IS LIKE, WHEN THEY GOING TO CHANGE THE SIDEWALK, IS THE SITE PLAN GOING TO BE, YOU KNOW, LIKE CHANGED? AND THEY HAVE TO YOU KNOW, LIKE, ARE WE APPROVING THE SITE PLAN AS IS OR IS IT? YES, WE ARE APPROVING THE SITE PLAN AS IS SOMETHING ELSE I WOULD LIKE TO POINT OUT TO THE COMMISSION RELATED TO THIS SITE IS THERE ARE SOME EXISTING CONDITIONS IN WHICH COMPLICATE THE SITE; BEING THAT I SHOULD HAVE HIGHLIGHTED IT, BUT THE NORTHERN PART OF THEIR BUILDING IS OVER THE RIGHT OF WAY LINE, AND THAT'S AN EXISTING CONDITION. SO THERE WERE SOME CHALLENGES WITH ORIGINALLY APPROVING THE SITE PLAN. SHOULD THE SITE PLAN GO BACK INTO REVIEW STAFF AND THE APPLICANT WOULD NEED SIGNIFICANT TIME TO ADDRESS SOME OF THESE EXISTING CONDITIONS THAT ARE CHALLENGES. OKAY. YEAH, THAT WAS MY SECOND QUESTION ABOUT THE ENCROACHMENT. YES. THANK YOU. OF COURSE. ONE FOLLOW UP QUESTION FOR ME. SO IF THEY HAD TO GO BACK THROUGH SITE PLANNING, WE WOULDN'T REALLY REQUIRE STREET PARKING RIGHT OFF OF THE 75 SERVICE ROAD WOULD BE? NO. SO WITH THESE STREET DESIGN STANDARDS, THERE IS THE MIXED USE CORNER OPTION. AND THAT CORNER OPTION DOES ACCOUNT FOR ON STREET PARKING. HOWEVER, IN THE ACTUAL DESIGN OF THAT OUR TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT WOULD LIKELY WORK WITH THE APPLICANT, PROBABLY NOT WANT TO HAVE ON STREET PARKING RIGHT NEXT TO US 75. BUT THE TYPICAL CROSS SECTION FOR THAT MIXED USE CORNER DOES ACCOUNT FOR ON STREET PARKING. WE WOULD HAVE TO EVALUATE THE NECESSITY, THE NECESSITY OF THAT IN A SITE PLAN REVIEW IF ONE WERE TO BE SUBMITTED. SO REALLY WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT IS PROBABLY THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A FIVE FOOT SIDEWALK AND A SEVEN FOOT SIDEWALK AT THE END OF THE DAY, BECAUSE I JUST CAN'T IMAGINE THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ALLOWING OR EVEN WANTING ON STREET PARKING THAT CLOSE TO 75. SO OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ALL RIGHT. SEEING NONE. THIS IS NOT A PUBLIC HEARING. AND DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKERS THAT ARE REGISTERED ON THIS ITEM? THE APPLICANTS ARE AVAILABLE VIA ZOOM TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS. OKAY. DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? COMMISSIONER BRONSKY. TOSAN HAS A QUESTION. GO AHEAD. OKAY. COMMISSIONER OLLEY. YOU HAVE A QUESTION FOR THE APPLICANT? YES. JUST ONE ON THE THE SITE ENGINEER THAT YOU GUYS LOST THAT ESSENTIALLY IS CAUSING THIS DELAY. WHEN WAS THAT KNOWN? I'M JUST TRYING TO UNDERSTAND WHY IN A TWO YEAR PERIOD, WE COULDN'T GET A BACKUP TO GET THIS PROCESS UNDERWAY . AND BEFORE YOU ANSWER, IF YOU'D INTRODUCE YOURSELF AND WHO YOU'RE WITH, PLEASE. MY NAME IS DREW DANOWSKI I'M WITH CLAYMORE ENGINEERING, AND I AM THAT SITE ENGINEER. ALTHOUGH I'VE BEEN ON THE PROJECT THE WHOLE TIME, IT WAS THE ARCHITECT. THEY HAD AN ISSUE WITH THE ARCHITECT. I'M NOT SURE EXACTLY WHAT THE EXTENT OF THAT WAS, BUT THEY HAD TO START OVER WITH A NEW ARCHITECT. WHEN WAS THAT KNOWN? THE ISSUE KNOWN? THEY MAY BE ABLE TO ANSWER ONLINE. I'M NOT AWARE OF WHEN THEY HAD TO START OVER. IS ANYBODY ONLINE? DO WE HAVE SOMEBODY ON ZOOM? [00:15:04] PARDON DO YOU MIND REPEATING THE QUESTION? DO WE HAVE ANYBODY ON ZOOM? THE APPLICANT IS THERE. ARE THEY AVAILABLE VIA ZOOM? CAN WE ADD? YES THEY ARE. CAN WE ADD THEM TO THE SCREEN? OKAY. GOOD EVENING HI. MY NAME IS ERICA [INAUDIBLE]. I'M AN ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR DRIVETIME CAR SALES. ALL RIGHT. COMMISSIONER OLLEY, CAN YOU RESTATE YOUR QUESTION, PLEASE? JUST THE QUESTION ON WHEN YOUR ORIGINAL ARCHITECT THAT FELL THROUGH. WHEN WAS THAT ISSUE KNOWN? I'M TRYING TO UNDERSTAND WHY THE REQUEST TO REINSTATE HAS JUST COME IN. SURE. SO IT WAS A STRUCTURAL ENGINEER THAT WAS ORIGINALLY INVOLVED. SO JUST TO GIVE A LITTLE BACKGROUND ON THE PROJECT. THIS ORIGINATED IN 2020 PRIOR TO THE PANDEMIC. IT WAS THEN KIND OF POSTPONED AND PLACED ON HOLD BECAUSE OF, YOU KNOW, THE COVID PANDEMIC. WE THEN, YOU KNOW, KICKED OFF THE PROJECT AGAIN IN 2022. AND AT THAT POINT, WHILE WE WERE GOING THROUGH THE CIVIL CIVIL SUBMITTAL WE LEARNED THAT THE STRUCTURAL ENGINEER WHO WAS ORIGINALLY INVOLVED WENT OUT OF BUSINESS. SINCE THEN, IT DID TAKE FROM MY UNDERSTANDING, A LITTLE OVER A YEAR FOR THE CIVIL PLANS TO ORIGINALLY, I BELIEVE, BE APPROVED. AND SO DURING THAT TIME WE, YOU KNOW, WE HAD TO CHANGE ARCHITECTURAL CONSULTANTS AND OUR TEAM OF ENGINEERS. AND WHILE WE WERE IN REVIEW WITH, YOU KNOW, THE BUILDING DEPARTMENT, THAT'S WHEN WE DISCOVERED THAT OUR SITE PLAN APPROVAL WAS EXPIRING IN DECEMBER, SO THAT'S WHY WE WERE SEEKING REINSTATEMENT. ALSO, I WILL ADD THAT OUR ORDINANCE STATES THAT THE APPLICANT CAN APPLY FOR A SITE PLAN EXTENSION REQUEST 60 DAYS PRIOR TO OR AFTER SO THAT WE WOULDN'T ACCEPT A SITE PLAN EXTENSION REQUEST BEFORE THAT 60 DAY MARK. GOTCHA. OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? NOBODY. THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. COMMISSION. COMMISSIONER BRONSKY. I MOVE, WE FOLLOW THE STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION AND APPROVE THIS TWO YEAR EXTENSION. COMMISSIONER OLLEY. SECOND. COMMISSIONER BROUNOFF, WOULD YOU LIKE. OH, TURNED OFF YOUR LIGHT. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. EVERYBODY PLEASE VOTE. MOTION PASSES 8 TO 0. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT. NEXT ITEM. COMMENTS OF PUBLIC INTEREST. THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING IS TO ALLOW UP TO 3 MINUTES PER SPEAKER, WITH 30 TOTAL MINUTES ON ITEMS OF INTEREST OR CONCERN, AND NOT ON ITEMS THAT ARE ON THE CURRENT AGENDA. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MAY NOT DISCUSS THESE ITEMS, BUT MAY RESPOND WITH FACTUAL OR POLICY INFORMATION. THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MAY CHOOSE TO PLACE THE ITEM ON A FUTURE AGENDA. THE PRESIDING OFFICER MAY MODIFY THESE TIMES AS DEEMED NECESSARY. WE DO HAVE ONE REGISTERED SPEAKER. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE BILL LISLE REGISTERED. IS HE ON ZOOM? YES. HE IS NOT. HE IS NOT. OKAY, WELL, THEN I GUESS WE DON'T HAVE ANYBODY FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS. ALL RIGHT, WELL, WITH THAT I THINK THAT CONCLUDES OUR BUSINESS FOR TONIGHT. WE'LL ADJOURN OUR MEETING AT 6: 18 AND 42 SECONDS. * This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.