Sep 23, 2024 City Council

[CALL TO ORDER]

[00:00:02]

I NOW DECLARE THAT THE PLANO CITY COUNCIL IS RECONVENED IN OPEN SESSION, THAT ALL MEMBERS ARE PRESENT.

WE'LL BEGIN TONIGHT'S REGULAR MEETING WITH THE INVOCATION LED BY REVEREND KIM MEYERS, SENIOR PASTOR OF WORSHIP AND EXPERIENCE AT SAINT ANDREW'S METHODIST CHURCH. PLEASE JOIN THE COUNCIL RECITING THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND TEXAS PLEDGE.

AFTER THAT, PLEASE RISE IF YOU CAN.

DEAR, GRACIOUS AND LOVING GOD, WE COME BEFORE YOU TODAY HUMBLY SEEKING YOUR PRESENCE AND GUIDANCE AS WE BEGIN THIS MEETING.

WE'RE GRATEFUL FOR THE OPPORTUNITY TO SERVE OUR COMMUNITY, KNOWING YOU HAVE CALLED EACH OF US TO LEAVE WITH WISDOM, COMPASSION, AND INTEGRITY.

WE PRAY FOR YOUR WISDOM TO FILL OUR MINDS AND OUR HEARTS AS WE MAKE DECISIONS THAT AFFECT THE LIVES OF THOSE IN OUR CITY.

GIVE US THE COURAGE TO ACT JUSTLY.

THE HUMILITY TO LISTEN TO EVERY VOICE AND THE INSIGHT TO DISCERN WHAT IS BEST FOR THE COMMON GOOD.

GRANT US PATIENCE IN OUR DISCUSSIONS, CLARITY IN OUR THINKING, AND UNITY IN OUR PURPOSE.

WE LIFT UP OUR CITY, ITS LEADERS, ITS CITIZENS, AND ALL WHO CALL THIS PLACE HOME.

PROTECT THOSE WHO SERVE IN EVERY CAPACITY AND GIVE PEACE TO THOSE WHO FEEL BURDEN.

MAY WE BE INSTRUMENTS OF YOUR GRACE, FOSTERING UNDERSTANDING AND COLLABORATION IN ALL WE DO.

WE OFFER THIS PRAYER IN YOUR HOLY NAME.

TRUSTING IN YOUR GUIDANCE AND CARE.

AMEN.

BE SEATED. THANK YOU, REVEREND MEYERS, THANK YOU.

ALL RIGHT. OKAY.

[CONSENT AGENDA]

THE CONSENT AGENDA.

THE CONSENT AGENDA WILL BE ACTED UPON IN ONE MOTION AND CONTAINS ITEMS WHICH ARE ROUTINE AND TYPICALLY NONCONTROVERSIAL.

ITEMS MAY BE REMOVED FROM THIS AGENDA FOR INDIVIDUAL DISCUSSION BY A COUNCILMEMBER, THE CITY MANAGER, OR ANY CITIZEN.

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL ESTABLISH TIME LIMITS BASED UPON THE NUMBER OF SPEAKER REQUESTS.

MR. MAYOR, I MOVE WE APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ITEM L FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION.

SECOND. THANK YOU.

I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF ITEM L.

ALL IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND.

MOTION PASSES 8 TO 0.

[(l)  

To repeal Ordinance No. 2023-9-10; establishing the classifications for the civil service members of the Plano Police Department for fiscal year 2024-25 with the effective date of October 1, 2024; establishing the number of positions and effective date for such positions for each classification; establishing the Compensation Plan for the civil service members of the Plano Police Department with the effective date of December 30, 2024; establishing Certification and Assignment Pay Plans for the civil service members of the Plano Police Department for fiscal year 2024-25 with the effective date of October 1, 2024; and providing a repealer clause, a severability clause and an effective date. Ordinance No. 2024-9-14 with amendment

ITEM L TO REPEAL ORDINANCE NUMBER 2023-9-11 ESTABLISHING THE CLASSIFICATIONS FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE.

MEMBERS OF THE PLANO POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, WITH THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF OCTOBER 1ST, 2024, ESTABLISHING THE NUMBER OF POSITIONS AND THE EFFECTIVE DATE FOR SUCH POSITIONS FOR EACH CLASSIFICATION.

ESTABLISHING THE COMPENSATION PLAN FOR CIVIL SERVICE MEMBERS OF THE PLANO POLICE DEPARTMENT WITH THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF DECEMBER 30TH, 2024.

ESTABLISHING CERTIFICATE AND ASSIGNMENT PAY PLANS FOR THE CIVIL SERVICE MEMBERS OF THE PLANO POLICE DEPARTMENT FOR FISCAL YEAR 2024-25, WITH AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF OCTOBER 1ST, 2024, PROVIDING A REPEALER CLAUSE, A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL.

EARLIER TODAY WE WERE DISCUSSING WITH HR AND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT.

IF WE NEED A LOT OF DETAIL, OUR HR DIRECTOR, VICTORIA HUYNH, IS IN THE AUDIENCE, BUT WHAT OCCURRED WAS AT THE LEVELS OF STEPS SEVEN, EIGHT, NINE AND TEN ON THE.

YES, THESE ARE THE ONES.

THIS IS THE UPDATED ONE THAT WAS BROUGHT TO YOU BY MISS WYNN EARLIER TODAY.

AT THOSE LEVELS, SOME CHANGES HAD OCCURRED THAT HAD OCCURRED AND AN UNANTICIPATED OCCURRENCE.

SO LAST YEAR'S PLAN HAD A FLAT RATE AT THOSE LEVELS AND HAD BEEN CARRIED THROUGH FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS, AND WE TRIED TO GO IN AND CREATE PERCENTAGES IN THOSE AREAS SO THAT WE COULD STAY WITH THE SIMILAR PERCENTAGES WITHIN EACH STEP, BETWEEN EACH STEP. WHEN WE DID THAT, THERE WAS AN UNANTICIPATED CHANGE THAT OCCURRED WITH THE NUMBERS, THE COMPENSATION LEVELS.

IT DID NOT IMPACT THE BEGINNING LEVELS OR THE TOP PAYOUT, BUT IT DID IMPACT THOSE LEVELS OF PAY.

[00:05:05]

THOSE ARE THE NUMBERS THAT SHOULD BE REFLECTED IN THE PAY PLAN.

SO WE'RE READY TO MOVE FORWARD WITH THOSE WITH WITH THAT AGREEMENT.

THANK YOU.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR LASHON.

I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM L SECOND.

THANK YOU. I HAVE A MOTION A SECOND TO APPROVE ITEM, AND JUST TO CLARIFY, IT IS WITH THE AMENDED WITH THE AMENDED PAY CHART.

OKAY. I'LL MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM L WITH THE AMENDED FIGURES.

I'M SORRY, CAN I JUST ASK A REALLY DUMB QUESTION? SO THE PREVIOUSLY CONSENT AGENDA TALKS ABOUT THE REPEAL OF THE ORDINANCE.

SO AT THIS POINT, ARE WE REPEALING THE ORDINANCE AND SUBSTITUTING IN THE AMENDED ORDINANCE? EVERY YEAR THE OLD ONE IS REPEALED AND THE NEW ONE IS ADOPTED.

I SEE, AND SO WE'RE REPEALING LAST YEAR'S AND THEN ADOPTING THIS NEW ONE, AND IT'S AMENDED BECAUSE IT'S A DIFFERENT CHART THAN WHAT WAS INCLUDED IN THE PACKET.

OKAY. GOT IT. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.

OKAY. YOU WANT ME TO SAY THE MOTION AGAIN? OKAY, GOOD.

ALL RIGHT, AND BOTH OF YOU SECONDED I APPRECIATE IT.

I SECOND THE MOTION AS CORRECTED.

YOU CAN CHOOSE. SO I HAVE A MOTION TO SECOND TO APPROVE ITEM L, AS AMENDED.

ALL IN FAVOR? MOTION PASSES 8 TO 0.

THANK YOU. NEXT ITEM.

ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION.

ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION.

[(1)  

Public Hearing and consideration of an Ordinance as requested in Zoning Case 2024-002 to amend the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City, Ordinance No. 2015-5-2, as heretofore amended, rezoning 8.6 acres of land located on the south side of 14th Street, 330 feet east of U.S. Highway 75, in the City of Plano, Collin County, Texas, from Corridor Commercial and Planned Development-123-Downtown Business/Government to Planned Development-123-Downtown Business/Government; directing a change accordingly in the official zoning map of the City; and providing a penalty clause, a repealer clause, a savings clause, a severability clause, a publication clause, and an effective date. Petitioners: Regency Property Investors, LP, Michael & Pamela Walker, Plano Family 001, LP, and Texas State Affordable Housing Corporation Conducted and adopted Ordinance No. 2024-9-15 as amended

REMAINING SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO 30 TOTAL MINUTES OF TESTIMONY TIME, WITH THREE MINUTES THREE MINUTES ASSIGNED PER SPEAKER.

THE PRESIDING OFFICER MAY AMEND THESE TIMES AS DEEMED NECESSARY.

NON PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL PERMIT PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA NOT POSTED FOR A PUBLIC HEARING.

THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL ESTABLISH TIME LIMITS BASED UPON THE NUMBER OF SPEAKER REQUESTS, THE LENGTH OF THE AGENDA, AND TO ENSURE MEETING EFFICIENCY, AND MAY INCLUDE A CUMULATIVE TIME LIMIT.

SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED IN THE ORDER THE REQUESTS ARE RECEIVED UNTIL THE CUMULATIVE TIME IS EXHAUSTED.

ITEM NUMBER ONE PUBLIC HEARING AND CONSIDERATION OF AN ORDINANCE AS REQUESTED IN ZONING CASE 2024-2 TO AMEND THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY. ORDINANCE NUMBER 2015-5-2 AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, REZONING 8.6 ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 14TH STREET, 330FT EAST OF U.S.

HIGHWAY 75, IN THE CITY OF PLANO, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS, FROM CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL AND PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 123 DOWNTOWN BUSINESS GOVERNMENT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT 123 DOWNTOWN BUSINESS GOVERNMENT DIRECTING A CHANGE ACCORDINGLY IN THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY, PROVIDING A PENALTY CLAUSE, A REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVINGS CLAUSE, A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, A PUBLICATION CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

GOOD EVENING, MAYOR, COUNCIL AND CITY EXECUTIVES.

I'M ERIC HILL, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR PLANNING.

SO THIS FIRST ZONING CASE ON YOUR AGENDA THIS EVENING IS A REQUEST TO EXPAND AN EXISTING PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT AND TO INCLUDE A SMALL PROPERTY THAT'S ADJACENT TO 14TH STREET, AS WELL AS ADD SOME PLANNED DEVELOPMENT STIPULATIONS TO SUPPORT THE LAST PHASE OF MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT.

THE AREA OF EXPANSION IS HIGHLIGHTED IN BLUE.

AS YOU CAN SEE, IT IS SURROUNDED BY PD 123 ZONING ON THREE SIDES, WITH MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT ON THE EAST AND SOUTH AND ACROSS THE STREET.

ACROSS 14TH STREET IS A NEW BANK DEVELOPMENT THAT'S ZONED CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL.

THIS IS THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSED PLAN.

AS YOU CAN SEE, IT IS AN ODDLY SHAPED PROPERTY WHICH HAS CREATED SOME SITE DESIGN CHALLENGES.

THERE WAS SOME DISCUSSION WITH P&Z ABOUT PARKING AND THE REQUEST WAS TABLED AT ITS FIRST HEARING ON JULY 15TH.

HOWEVER, THOSE ISSUES WERE RESOLVED AT THE SECOND HEARING AND THIS REQUEST DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY ADJUSTMENTS TO PARKING REQUIREMENTS AT THIS TIME.

THE ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT FOR THIS PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT HAS GONE THROUGH VARIOUS STAGES OVER ITS LIFE.

THE PROPERTY IN RED IS THE EXISTING PATRIOT PARK PHASE ONE DEVELOPMENT, AND THE PROPERTY IN BLUE IS A MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT THAT'S CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION, AND THEN THE PROPERTIES IN YELLOW AND PURPLE ARE THOSE THAT ARE UNDER CONSIDERATION THIS EVENING.

SO THE APPLICANT IS NOT PROPOSING TO MODIFY THE EXISTING PD STIPULATIONS.

[00:10:04]

SOME OF THOSE EXISTING STIPULATIONS REGULATE MULTIFAMILY DEVELOPMENT AND OTHERS RELATE TO AN ADJACENT SINGLE FAMILY HOME.

YOU MAY RECALL THIS WAS AN ISSUE WHEN THIS PROPERTY, THE PD, WAS REZONED SOME TIME AGO.

HOWEVER, THERE'S A FENCE THAT HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED AS A BUFFER FOR THIS HOME, WHICH IS AN EXISTING STIPULATION.

THERE'S ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING THAT WILL BE INSTALLED FOR FURTHER SCREENING, AND THERE'S SOME ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT WHICH THE APPLICANT WILL BE RELOCATING TO ACCOMMODATE THAT LANDSCAPING. SO PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.

THERE'S LANGUAGE THAT'S BEEN ADDED THAT CLARIFIES THAT 330 MULTIFAMILY UNITS ARE WHAT'S ALLOWED.

THERE ARE NO ADDITIONAL UNITS BEING PROPOSED.

THE UNITS THAT ARE REQUESTED ON THIS PROPERTY, PROPOSED ON THIS PROPERTY, FOR DEVELOPMENT ARE WITHIN THE EXPRESSWAY CORRIDOR ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AREA ONE EHA 1, AND THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING MITIGATION STANDARDS FOR THEIR DEVELOPMENT ONLY, AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION ALSO INCLUDED AN ADDITIONAL STIPULATION RELATED TO THE EHA.

THE PROPERTY IS IN THE DOWNTOWN CORRIDORS FUTURE LAND USE CATEGORY, AND THE REQUEST IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, WITH CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE PROPOSED EHA MITIGATION STANDARDS.

WE RECEIVED ONE RESPONSE WITHIN THE PROPERTY, AND THAT'S THE SMALL 2/10 OF AN ACRE PROPERTY THAT'S BEING ADDED TO THIS REQUEST, AND THAT'S IN FAVOR.

WE RECEIVED THREE RESPONSES IN OPPOSITION WITHIN THE 200 FOOT BUFFER, AND THEN IN TOTAL WE RECEIVED EIGHT RESPONSES THREE IN SUPPORT, ONE NEUTRAL AND FOUR IN OPPOSITION.

THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL BY A VOTE OF 6 TO 2.

I'D BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, AND THE APPLICANT IS HERE WITH A PRESENTATION AS WELL.

THANKS, ERIC. ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? SHELBY. THANK YOU.

ERIC. AS I UNDERSTAND THIS IT'S NO ADDITIONAL MULTIFAMILY UNITS ARE WOULD BE APPROVED BEYOND WHAT'S ALREADY BEEN APPROVED ON THE AREAS.

CORRECT. THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY.

THAT'S WHAT I THOUGHT. THE RESPONSES IN OPPOSITION SEEM TO SAY NO NEW MULTIFAMILY, BUT WE'RE NOT LOOKING AT ANY NET NEW MULTIFAMILY.

THAT'S CORRECT. THAT'S NOT ALREADY BEEN APPROVED.

IT HASN'T BEEN BUILT. IT'S JUST YET, BUT IT'S STILL THAT'S RIGHT. OKAY. THANK YOU.

ANYBODY ELSE FOR STAFF? ALL RIGHT. THANKS, ERIC.

I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

DO YOU HAVE ANY SPEAKERS? JUST THE APPLICANT, MARK LEON.

GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS MARK LEON WITH CROSS ARCHITECTS.

OUR ADDRESS IS 879 JUNCTION DRIVE, LOCATED IN ALLEN, TEXAS.

AS STAFF MENTIONED, WE HAVE BEEN IN VERY CLOSE CONVERSATION WITH STAFF SINCE APPROXIMATELY NOVEMBER OF 2023, WORKING THROUGH THIS VERY ODDLY SHAPED PIECE OF LAND.

UNDERSTANDING THE PD RESTRICTIONS, THE RULES THAT ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS TRACT OF LAND, AS WELL AS SPEAKING WITH THE RESIDENTS ON THE NORTHERN SIDE, THE SMALL TRACT THAT WE'RE TRYING TO ADD TO THE OVERALL PD, AS WELL AS THE RESIDENTS TO THE SOUTH THAT WE'RE BEING GOOD NEIGHBORS AND RESPECTING THEIR PROPERTY AND PROVIDING THE REQUIRED SETBACKS AND LANDSCAPE BUFFERS.

I THINK THE BIG KEY TO THIS WHOLE CONVERSATION IS THAT WE ARE 100% COMPLYING WITHIN THE PD AS IT SITS.

WE ARE NOT ASKING FOR ANY VARIANCES, ANY STIPULATIONS.

WE'RE NOT ADDING ANY NEW UNITS.

STAYING AT THE 129 UNITS FOR OUR TRACT OF LAND, WHICH ADDS TO THE 330 FOR THE ENTIRE PD.

WE HAVE GONE THROUGH ALL THE DRC MEETINGS, SPOKEN WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT, ENGINEERING, TRAFFIC PLANNING.

WORKED CLOSELY WITH JOHN KIM AND MIKE BELL.

HAVING THEM HELP GUIDE US THROUGH THE PD AND UNDERSTAND SOME OF THE MORE DIFFICULT SETBACKS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR THIS TRACT BUT WE FEEL THAT WE'RE PRESENTING A BEAUTIFUL, AMAZING PROJECT.

TO BE CLEAR, IT IS A MARKET RATE PROJECT.

THIS IS NOT AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING.

IT'S NOT ASSISTED LIVING.

IT'S NOT SECTION EIGHT.

NONE OF THOSE TERMS. THIS IS LUXURY HIGH END APARTMENTS IS WHAT WE'RE PROPOSING.

JUST TO KIND OF QUICKLY WALK YOU THROUGH THE SITE JUST USING THE RENDERING THAT WE'RE SHOWING HERE, WE'RE PROPOSING TWO BUILDINGS THAT ARE ORIENTED NORTH AND SOUTH, PRIMARILY WITH A FIRE LANE THAT ALSO GOES NORTH AND SOUTH BETWEEN THE TWO BUILDINGS.

THE AMENITY AREA, OR THE CLUBHOUSE AREA IS GOING TO BE IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE FIRST BUILDING, KIND OF THAT BRIGHT PINK AREA.

THAT'S WHERE THE CLUBHOUSE, A HIGH END FITNESS CENTER, AS WELL AS THE LUXURY POOL IS GOING TO BE LOCATED AND THE LEASING AREA FOR MANAGEMENT, MAIL AND THOSE AREAS FOR

[00:15:01]

IT'S IN ORDER TO PROVIDE THE APPROPRIATE AMOUNT OF PARKING TO SUPPORT THIS PROJECT, AND YES, I THINK THAT'S A PRIMARILY WHAT WE'RE SHOWING.

IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS AT ALL.

I AM THE ARCHITECT OF RECORD ON THE PROJECT, VERY FAMILIAR WITH IT.

PLEASE LET ME KNOW. I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE.

THANK YOU, MARK. ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? THANK YOU. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND CONFINE THE COMMENTS TO THE COUNCIL.

MR. MAYOR, I WENT THROUGH AND REVIEWED.

I'M SORRY. I'M SORRY, MR. MAYOR. I WENT AND REVIEWED THE WATCH THE P&Z MEETING ON THIS.

IT SEEMS A LOT OF THE DISCUSSION WAS WRAPPED AROUND IN PARKING, AND THAT WAS RESOLVED THROUGH THE DISCUSSION THERE, AND I ALSO SEE THAT THIS PROPERTY IS STILL GOING TO BE COMPLIANT WITH THE PD 123, WHICH IS WHAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR.

IT'S ALSO COMPLIANT WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN MEETS ALL THOSE REQUIREMENTS, AND IT'S BRINGING WHAT I THINK IS A LEVEL OF HOUSING TO THE AREA THAT WE HOPE WILL BENEFIT THE IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORHOOD.

SO I WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS ORDINANCE AS PRESENTED.

OKAY. DID YOU HAVE A QUESTION OR A STATEMENT? WELL, I ALSO WATCHED THE P&Z MEETING, AND I'D LIKE TO ACTUALLY OFFER AN AMENDMENT TO UNDO THE STIPULATION THAT WAS ADDED IN THE P&Z MEETING, BECAUSE I THINK IT SETS A PROBLEMATIC PRECEDENT FOR US TO BE GETTING THAT INVOLVED IN THE NOTIFICATION STANDARDS FOR COMPLIANCE, FILTRATION, ETC..

DO YOU WANT TO? IF WE COULD BRING THE APPLICANT BACK UP TO EXPLAIN WHERE WE HAD WITH THE EHA 1 MITIGATION EFFORTS THAT THEY HAD SO WE CAN BRING MARK, IF YOU MIND COMING BACK AND I'M SPECIFICALLY REFERRING TO THE ADDITION THAT WAS ADDED BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.

YEAH, ABSOLUTELY.

WE THAT WAS BROUGHT UP BY STAFF AT P&Z AT OUR SECOND VISIT TO P&Z.

WE'RE MORE THAN HAPPY TO COMPLY WITH ANY STIPULATION THAT THE CITY WOULD LIKE TO PUT ON US.

OF COURSE, BUT THE REASON THAT WE IT WAS BROUGHT UP WAS BECAUSE STAFF PROPOSED IT.

THEY HAD CONCERNS. THEY WANTED TO MAKE SURE THAT WE WERE IN FULL COMPLIANCE.

WE DID ORDER A THIRD PARTY NOISE STUDY COMPANY CAME.

THEY MONITORED THE SITE FOR THE APPROPRIATE AMOUNT OF TIME.

THEY CREATED A REPORT, THEY SUBMITTED IT AND OUR DESIGN PRIOR TO THAT ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENT THAT WAS STATED AT THE SECOND P&Z.

WE WERE IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THAT NOISE ORDINANCE ALREADY.

SO OBVIOUSLY WE WOULD BE MORE THAN HAPPY TO REMOVE THAT STIPULATION OR APPLY WITH IT, WHICHEVER STAFF.

I WAS ACTUALLY I'M SORRY, I WAS ACTUALLY REFERRING TO THE FILTRATION NOTICE REQUIREMENTS THE SIGNAGE.

RIGHT. YEAH, AND KIND OF WHAT I STATED DURING P&Z, I'M SURE YOU HEARD WHEN YOU LISTENED TO IT, WAS THAT IF YOU'VE EVER LIVED IN APARTMENTS.

FOR ME, IT'S BEEN QUITE A WHILE BACK IN MY 20S, BUT TENANTS DON'T REPLACE FILTERS.

IT'S JUST A FACT.

YOU CAN PUT AS MUCH SIGNAGE ON THOSE FILTERS AS YOU WANT, SAYING THAT THEY MUST BE CHANGED EVERY THREE MONTHS, SIX MONTHS, FOUR MONTHS, WHATEVER THE TIME PERIOD IS.

THOSE FILTERS ARE GOING TO BE REPLACED WHEN THOSE TENANTS MOVE OUT AND MANAGEMENT CLEANS IT AND GETS IT READY FOR THE NEXT TENANTS, THAT'S REALLY WHEN THE FILTERS WILL BE REPLACED. I THINK IT'S A DIFFICULT THING TO TRULY ENFORCE.

WE'RE HAPPY TO PUT WHATEVER POSTED SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED, BUT I BELIEVE THAT THE ACTUAL LOGISTICS OF ENFORCING IT ARE NOT REALLY TENABLE OR POSSIBLE, IN MY OPINION.

JUST FROM MY 17 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE BUILDING APARTMENTS ACROSS THE STATE OF TEXAS.

AM I MISSING IN HERE WHERE IT'S EXPLAINING EXACTLY WHAT WAS PROPOSED? I THINK IT'S UNDER AIR, AIR FILTRATION.

SO IT'S NUMBER SIX B POLLUTION MITIGATION MEASURES.

ITEM TWO, AIR FILTRATION.

NUMBER THREE, PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SHALL POST NOTICE OF THE AIR FILTRATION MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDED REPLACEMENT SPECIFICATIONS AND A LOG OF RECENT FILTER CHANGES IN A LOCATION ACCESSIBLE TO RESIDENTS.

OKAY. I MUST BE LOOKING AT IT WRONG.

I SEE I DON'T SEE A THREE ON MINE.

THAT'S ON PAGE THREE.

I'M SORRY. YEAH, IT'S AT THE TOP OF PAGE THREE.

WE'RE HAVING PROBLEMS. YEAH, I DON'T HAVE A THREE ON MINE.

[00:20:01]

OKAY. SO CAN YOU JUST SHOW ME YOURS? BECAUSE I DON'T SEE THAT ON MINE.

I JUST SEE A NUMBER ONE AND NUMBER TWO.

OKAY, IT'S SO UNDER UNDER THE NOVUS AGENDA ITEM, IT'S THE 47 PAGE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS PDF DOCUMENT FOR PDF.

YEAH. THAT'S BECAUSE NOVUS IS DOWN.

YEAH. I CAN ACCESS IT.

WELL, YEAH. HERE YOU GO. YOU'RE REFERRING TO WHAT COMMISSIONER BRONSKY REQUESTED TO BE ADDED AT THE P AND Z MEETING WHERE THIS WAS PASSED, RIGHT? THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. YEAH.

JUST TO ADD SOME CONTEXT TO WHAT IT WAS ABOUT THE, THE LOGISTICS OF, YOU KNOW, NOT THE LEGAL JARGON, BUT ESSENTIALLY THE, THE AIR HANDLER UNITS LOCATED WITHIN EACH UNIT THAT ARE SERVING THE AC AND HEAT FOR THAT UNIT.

THERE IS A FILTER LOCATED IN THAT SYSTEM, AND THERE WAS JUST VERBIAGE DURING P AND Z AT THE SECOND ATTEMPT IN ORDER TO PUT SIGNAGE ON THE REQUIREMENT FOR HOW OFTEN THAT FILTER NEEDED TO BE REPLACED, THAT'S WHAT THE LANGUAGE WAS ADDED FOR.

OKAY. GO AHEAD.

YOU'RE JUST TALKING ABOUT THE REQUIREMENT THAT WAS ADDED TO ADD LABELING TO SAY CORRECT? YEAH. I'M JUST PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO STRIKE P&Z'S AMENDMENT.

YEAH, I AGREE.

I'M SUPPORTIVE OF THAT, TOO.

WE MAY BE SETTING. WE MAY BE SETTING A POLICY.

HE'S READY. HE'S READY.

THIS ANALOGY IS THE SAME AS AN ANALOGY AS YOU GO INTO A RESTAURANT AND YOU SEE THE CLEANING SCHEDULE ON THE BACK OF THE DOOR.

THIS IS SOMETHING THAT WE SHOULD NOT BE MANDATING TO THIS.

SO I WOULD LIKE TO AMEND MY PROPOSAL.

I'D LIKE TO APPROVE THIS ITEM AS PRESENTED WITH THE AMENDMENT THAT WE STRIKE THE AIR FILTRATION CLAUSE, PARTICULARLY 2-3 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT SHALL POST NOTICE OF AIR FILTRATION MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDED REPLACEMENT SPECIFICATIONS AND LOGS OF RECENT FILTER CHANGES IN A LOCATION ACCESSIBLE TO THE RESIDENTS.

THAT'S THE NARRATIVE I'D LIKE TO SEE STRUCK.

SECONDED. THANK YOU.

THANK YOU. EVERYBODY'S GOOD.

SO I HAVE A MOTION AND SECOND TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER ONE, AS JUST DESCRIBED PERFECTLY BY COUNCILMEMBER HORNE.

ALL IN FAVOR? MOTION PASSES 8 TO 0.

THANK YOU. TOLD Y'ALL IT WAS GOING TO BE ONE OF THOSE MEETINGS.

ITEM TWO. ITEM NUMBER TWO.

[(2)  

Public Hearing and consideration of an Ordinance as requested in Zoning Case 2024-016 to amend the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City, Ordinance No. 2015-5-2, as heretofore amended, granting Specific Use Permit No. 75 for Electrical Substation on 0.7 acre of land located 345 feet south of Summit Avenue and 1,245 feet west of Klein Road in the City of Plano, Collin County, Texas, presently zoned Research/Technology Center and located within the 190 Tollway/Plano Parkway Overlay District, directing a change accordingly in the official zoning map of the City; and providing a penalty clause, a repealer clause, a savings clause, a severability clause, a publication clause, and an effective date.  Petitioner: Aligned Data Centers (DFW) Propco, LLC Conducted and adopted Ordinance No. 2024-9-16

PRESENTLY ZONED RESEARCH TECHNOLOGY CENTER LOCATED WITHIN THE I OR 190 TOLLWAY PLANO PARKWAY OVERLAY DISTRICT, DIRECTING A CHANGE ACCORDINGLY IN THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY, PROVIDING A PENALTY CLAUSE, A REPEALER CLAUSE, A SAVINGS CLAUSE, A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, A PUBLICATION CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

GOOD EVENING, AGAIN.

THE AREA OF THIS REQUESTED ELECTRICAL SUBSTATION IS WITHIN AN EXISTING DATA CENTER PROPERTY.

IT IS SURROUNDED BY RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGY, ZONING, AND EXISTING NONRESIDENTIAL USES.

THIS IS THE PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AND YOU CAN SEE THE LOCATION OF THE BOUNDARY HERE IN RED AT THE RIGHT HAND CORNER.

IT'S ALSO SHOWN HERE A LITTLE BIT HARDER TO SEE, BUT THIS IS THE AERIAL OF THE PROPERTY AND THIS REQUEST IS INTENDED TO SUPPORT THE EXISTING DATA CENTER.

THERE'S SOME INFORMATION IN THE STAFF REPORT ABOUT POWER.

THERE'S A PROPOSED TEMPORARY POWER SUPPLY COMING FROM THE EXISTING SUBSTATION TO THE NORTHEAST, BUT PERMANENT POWER IS PROPOSED FROM THE TRANSMISSION LINES TO THE SOUTH.

THE REQUEST IS IN THE EMPLOYMENT CENTER'S LAND USE CATEGORY AND IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

WE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY RESPONSES ON THIS ZONING CASE.

I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT THE APPLICANT IS HERE IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS.

SORRY. P&Z ALSO RECOMMENDED APPROVAL WITH A VOTE OF EIGHT ZERO.

ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? ALL RIGHT. I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

THE ONLY SPEAKER WE HAVE IS THE APPLICANT, CARDELL ANDREWS II.

GOOD EVENING. GOOD AFTERNOON, COUNCIL.

CARDELL ANDREWS, 2800 SUMMIT AVENUE, PLANO, TEXAS.

[00:25:01]

JUST HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU GUYS HAVE ANY.

APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU.

I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

CONFINE THE COMMENTS TO THE COUNCIL.

MAYOR, I'D MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION, AND SECOND TO APPROVE.

ITEM NUMBER TWO.

ALL IN FAVOR? RAISE YOUR HAND. MOTION PASSES 8 TO 0.

NEXT ITEM.

ITEM NUMBER THREE.

[(3)  Public Hearing and consideration of an Ordinance as requested in Zoning Case 2024-017 to amend the Comprehensive Zoning Ordinance of the City, Ordinance No. 2015-5-2, as heretofore amended, granting Specific Use Permit No. 79 for Trade School on 0.02 acre of land located 230 feet north of Park Boulevard and 440 feet west of Coit Road in the City of Plano, Collin County, Texas, presently zoned Retail, directing a change accordingly in the official zoning map of the City; and providing a penalty clause, a repealer clause, a savings clause, a severability clause, a publication clause, and an effective date.  Petitioner: DFW Chinatown Coit, LLC Conducted and adopted Ordinance No. 2024-9-17]

ORDINANCE NUMBER 2015-5-2 AS HERETOFORE AMENDED, GRANTING SPECIFIC USE PERMIT NUMBER 79 FOR TRADE SCHOOL ON 0.02 ACRE OF LAND LOCATED 230FT NORTH OF PARK BOULEVARD AND 440FT WEST OF COIT ROAD IN THE CITY OF PLANO, COLLIN COUNTY, TEXAS.

PRESENTLY ZONED RETAIL.

DIRECTING A CHANGE ACCORDINGLY IN THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY.

PROVIDING A PENALTY CLAUSE, A REPEALER CLAUSE.

SAVINGS CLAUSE, A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE, A PUBLICATION CLAUSE, AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE.

THIS REQUEST FOR AN SUP FOR TRADE SCHOOL IS WITHIN AN EXISTING LEASE SPACE ON THE SECOND FLOOR OF A SHOPPING CENTER.

THE REQUEST IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMMUNITY CORNERS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN LAND USE, AND IS IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE OTHER POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN.

DID NOT RECEIVE.

SORRY. WE RECEIVED ONE RESPONSE IN NEUTRALITY OF THIS REQUEST, AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL BY A VOTE OF 8 TO 0.

BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS, AND I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT IS ALSO HERE IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? THANKS, ERIC. THANKS.

I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.

THE ONLY SPEAKER WE HAVE ON THE LIST IS JENNIFER HIRAMOTO.

GOOD EVENING. GOOD EVENING, JENNIFER HIRAMOTO 10233 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY IN DALLAS.

I'M HERE REPRESENTING THE TENANT AND THE PROPERTY OWNER AND THE REQUEST FOR THE SUP.

I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.

ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? OKAY. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.

I'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING.

FIND THE COMMENTS OF THE COUNCIL.

MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE.

SECOND. I HAVE A MOTION TO SECOND TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER THREE.

ALL IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND.

MOTION PASSES 8 TO 0.

THANK YOU. NEXT ITEM.

ITEM NUMBER FOUR.

[(4)  Consideration of a Resolution to nominate an individual for election to the Collin Central Appraisal District Board of Directors; and providing an effective date. Adopted Resolution No. 2024-9-18(R) nominating Rick Grady.]

THIS COMES BACK TO US IN DECEMBER WITH ALL THE ENTITIES THAT ARE INVOLVED IN VOTING FOR THIS CAD INDIVIDUAL. SO IF WE HAVE SOMEBODY WE CAN NOMINATE, I THINK A TOTAL UP TO FIVE PEOPLE, BUT WE'RE ALSO GOING TO GET A LIST FROM ALL THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND CITIES AND COUNTY IN COLLIN COUNTY.

SO IT IT'S UP TO US TO, YOU KNOW, IF WE HAVE SOMEBODY SPECIFICALLY, THAT'S GREAT, BUT WE CAN WAIT TILL DECEMBER AND LOOK AT THE LIST THAT'S BEEN GENERATED BY ALL THE OTHER ENTITIES.

SO UNLESS YOU HAVE SOMEBODY READY.

COUNCILMEMBER HORNE AND I SPOKE BRIEFLY ABOUT THIS.

RICK GRADY CURRENTLY SERVES AND HAS EXPRESSED INTEREST IN REAPPLYING.

THE NUMBER OF VOTES WE GET AS THE CITY OF PLANO IS MINUSCULE COMPARED TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICTS IN COLLIN COUNTY, BUT IF IT IS AGREEABLE TO COUNCILMEMBER GRADY, I'D LIKE TO NOMINATE RICK GRADY AGAIN.

OKAY, AND I THINK THE OTHER PERSON, RON KELLY, DID NOT WANT TO CONTINUE.

SO THAT WOULD BE THE ONLY ONE THAT'S PRESENTLY ON THAT.

CORRECT.

SO YOU SAID COUNCILMEMBER GRADY.

YEAH. OKAY.

IF IT'S AGREEABLE TO RICK, I'D LIKE TO NOMINATE RICK.

THERE WE GO. THERE WE GO.

RICK AND RICK. DO WE NEED A MOTION OR? OKAY, SO GO AHEAD AND MAKE MAKE A MOTION.

MY APOLOGIES, COUNCILMEMBER HORNE.

I'D LIKE TO MAKE THE MOTION TO NOMINATE RICK GRADY.

IF IT'S AGREEABLE TO RICK HORNE.

I SECOND THAT MOTION.

SO I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND TO NOMINATE RICK GRADY TO CONTINUE ON THE CAD AND BE ON THE LIST FOR

[00:30:08]

SO ALL IN FAVOR, RAISE YOUR HAND.

MOTION PASSES 8 TO 0, AND THEN ITEM FIVE, ITEM NUMBER FIVE.

[(5)  

Consideration of a Resolution to nominate an individual for election to the Denton Central Appraisal District Board of Directors; and providing an effective date. No action taken

IS EVERYBODY OKAY WITH THAT? YES. OKAY.

THERE BEING NO FURTHER BUSINESS PUBLIC COMMENTS? I DON'T THINK WE HAVE ANY.

NO ONE SIGNED UP TO SPEAK FOR PUBLIC COMMENTS.

YEAH. WE'RE ADJOURNED.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.