[00:00:02]
[CALL TO ORDER]
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING.I WILL NOW CALL THE MEETING TO ORDER AT ABOUT 7 0 1 IT LOOKS LIKE AT, UM, ALL RISE.
AND PLEASE JOIN ME IN THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, A PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS, ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE ALL.
BEFORE WE GET INTO THINGS, I'D LIKE TO RECOGNIZE A PRIOR PLANNING AND ZONING MEMBER WHO IS HERE WITH US TONIGHT, OUR NEWLY ELECTED COUNCIL MEMBER.
THANKS FOR COMING OUT, RICK, AND CONGRATULATIONS.
OKAY, WELL, UH, LET'S GET, LET'S GET TO BUSINESS HERE.
THIS PORTION OF THE MEETING IS TO ALLOW UP TO THREE MINUTES PER SPEAKER WITH 30 TOTAL MINUTES OF, OF ID, PARDON ME WITH 30 TOTAL MINUTES ON ITEMS OF INTEREST OR CONCERN AND NOT ON ITEMS THAT ARE ON THE CURRENT AGENDA.
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MAY NOT DISCUSS THESE ITEMS, BUT MAY RESPOND WITH FACTUAL OR POLICY INFORMATION.
THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MAY CHOOSE TO PLACE THE ITEM ON A FUTURE AGENDA.
THE PRESIDING OFFICER MAY MODIFY THESE TIMES AS DEEMED NECESSARY.
ARE THERE ANY REGISTERED SPEAKERS? THERE ARE NOT.
WELL
[CONSENT AGENDA]
THE CONSENT AGENDA.THE CONSENT AGENDA WILL BE ACTED UPON IN ONE MOTION AND CONTAINS ITEMS THAT WHICH ARE ROUTINE AND TYPICALLY NON-CONTROVERSIAL ITEMS MAY BE REMOVED FROM THIS AGENDA FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION BY COMMISSIONERS OR STAFF.
DOES ANYONE WISH TO PULL AN ITEM FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA? A MOVE.
WE APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS SUBMITTED.
WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BROSKY AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BRUNO TO MO MOVE FORWARD AS PRESENTED.
AND SO PLEASE VOTE WITH A VOTE OF SEVEN 20.
THE MOTION TO MOVE THE CONSENT, SEND IT FORWARD PASSES.
GOOD JOB ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL.
[1. (RP) Public Hearing - Replat & Revised Site Plan: Willow Bend Polo Estates Phase B, Block B, Lot 17R - One Patio Home lot on 0.3 acre located on the west side of Old Westbury Lane, 85 feet north of Turtle Creek Drive. Zoned Planned Development-423- Patio Home. Projects #R2023-016 and #RSP2023-024. Applicant: NLW Trust (Administrative consideration)]
FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION.PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS UNLESS INSTRUCTED OTHERWISE BY THE CHAIR, SPEAKERS WILL BE CALLED UPON IN THE ORDER REGISTRATIONS ARE RECEIVED.
APPLICANTS ARE LIMITED TO A TOTAL OF 15 MINUTES OF PRESENTATION TIME WITH A FIVE MINUTE REBUTTAL IF NEEDED.
REMAINING SPEAKERS ARE LIMITED TO 30 TOTAL MINUTES OF TESTIMONY TIME WITH THREE MINUTES ASSIGNED PER SPEAKER.
THE PRESIDING OFFICER MAY MODIFY THESE TIMES AS DEEMED NECESSARY.
ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION ITEMS MUST BE APPROVED IF THEY MEET CITY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
LEGISLATIVE CONSIDERATION ITEMS ARE MORE DISCRETIONARY EXCEPT AS CONSTRAINED BY LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS.
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER ONE, PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT AND REVISE SITE PLAN.
WILLOW BEND POLO ESTATES PHASE B, BLOCK B LOT 17 R ONE PATIO HOME LOT ON 0.3 ACRE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF OLD WESTBURY LANE, 85 FEET NORTH OF TURTLE CREEK DRIVE ZONE PLAN DEVELOPMENT 4 23 PATIO HOME APPLICANT IS N L W TRUST.
THIS IS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION.
MY NAME IS DONNA SEPULVEDA, SENIOR PLANNER WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, AND THESE ITEMS ARE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED AND I'M HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
DO ANY COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY TECHNICAL OR ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? YOU CAN.
ARE THEY LIKE COMBINING TWO LOTS AND DO A SINGLE LOT? IS THAT THE PURPOSE OF THIS? THAT'S CORRECT, YES.
NO, I, I DROVE BY THERE THE OTHER DAY AND UM, THE, UH, UH, DEVELOPER HAS FOUR SALE SIGNS UP PRETTY MUCH IN FRONT OF EVERY LOT AND A NUMBER OF THEM HAVE SOLD SIGNS UP.
SO THESE LOTS ARE SELLING THIS THOUGHT'LL.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? SEEING NONE, I WILL NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? WE HAVE NO REGISTERED SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM.
OKAY, WELL, SEEING NONE I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND CONFINE COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSIONER STAFF.
WE MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEM NUMBER ONE.
SECOND WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM NUMBER ONE BY COMMISSIONER BROTH AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BROSKY, PLEASE VOTE AND AGAIN BY ACCOUNT OF SEVEN TO ZERO.
[2. (DS) Public Hearing - Replat: Starr East, Block A, Lot 1 - One General Residential lot on 0.2 acre located at the northwest corner of 13th Street and G Avenue. Zoned General Residential. Project #R2023-020. Applicant: Kent and Carla Starr (Administrative consideration)]
[00:05:06]
AGENDA ITEM NUMBER TWO, PUBLIC HEARING REPLAT STAR EAST BLOCK A LOT.ONE, ONE GENERAL RES RESIDENTIAL LOT ON 0.2 ACRE LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 13TH STREET AND G AVENUE ZONE.
GENERAL RESIDENTIAL APPLICANTS ARE KENT AND CARLOS STARR.
THIS IS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION.
THIS ITEM IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
DO I HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? WHAT, WHAT IS THE, WHAT IS THE POINT OF WHAT'S HAPPENING HERE? WHAT'S HAPPENING WITH THIS VOTE TO CONSTRUCT A HOME, UH, ON THAT LOT, CORRECT.
I WILL NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION? NO, BUT THEY ARE HERE IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION.
OKAY, THEN DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? SEEING NONE, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND UM, WE'LL, UH, COM, UH, COMMENTS DUE TO COMMISSION.
MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE ITEM TWO AS PRESENTED.
SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY COMMISSIONER RATLIFF, A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BROSKY.
PLEASE VOTE AND THAT MOTION PASSES SEVEN TO ZERO.
I I'D LIKE TO MENTION THAT THE REASON IT'S SEVEN TO ZERO IS OUR CHAIRMAN DOWNS IS NOT HERE TONIGHT AND I HAVE THE, THE, UH, FUN TIME SITTING IN FOR HIM.
SO ANYWAY, SO THAT'S WHY IT'S SEVEN TO ZERO.
[3. (DS) Public Hearing - Preliminary Replat: Spring Central Addition, Block A, Lot 2R - Professional/general administrative office on one lot on 0.9 acre located on the east side of U.S. Highway 75, 600 feet south of Spring Creek Parkway. Zoned Corridor Commercial. Project #PR2022-036. Applicant: Askari Properties, LLC (Administrative consideration)]
ITEM NUMBER THREE, PUBLIC HEARING PRELIMINARY REPLAT SPRING CENTRAL EDITION BLOCK A LOT.TWO R PROFESSIONAL, GENERAL ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE ON ONE LOT ON 0.9 ACRE LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF US.
HIGHWAY 75 600 FEET SOUTH OF SPRING CREEK PARKWAY ZONE CORRIDOR COMMERCIAL APPLICANT IS A SCARRY PROPERTIES L L C.
THIS IS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION.
THIS ITEM IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL SUBJECT TO ADDITIONS AND OR ALTERATIONS TO THE ENGINEERING PLANS AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
AND DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ON THIS PARTICULAR ITEM? YES, MR. O JUST ONE.
THERE'S UH, A COMMENT ON, UH, A FLOODED CERTIFICATE AND IT LOOKS LIKE THE EASEMENT THAT WE ARE, UM, THE, THE DEDICATED EASEMENT SEEMS TO SIT WITHIN A FLOOD PLANE.
AM I READING THAT CORRECTLY OR THERE IS A FLOODPLAIN EASEMENT ON THE PROPERTY.
AND THIS WOULD, DOES THIS IMPACT, UM, THE ABILITY FOR THAT AREA TO FLOOD IN ANY WAY OR THIS HELPS IN ANY WAY OR THIS IS JUST MORE FOR GENERAL, UM, POLICE FIRE TO GET TO THE PROPERTY.
THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT HAS REVIEWED THIS PLAN AND THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS OUTSIDE OF THE EASEMENT.
ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? OKAY, SAYING NONE.
I WILL NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND, UH, DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS COMMISSION? THE APPLICANT IS IN ATTENDANCE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS FROM THE COMMISSION.
DO THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? OKAY, SEEING NONE, I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND COMBINE COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION AND STAFF.
I MOVE, WE, UH, APPROVE THIS SUBJECT TO ADDITIONS AND OR ALTERATIONS TO THE ENGINEERING PLAN AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
PLEASE VOTE AND AGAIN BY SEVEN TO ZERO THIS PASSES.
THERE'S NOTHING THROUGH THIS
[4. (DS) Public Hearing - Preliminary Replat, Site Plan, & Revised Site Plan: Northglen 2 Addition, Block B, Lots 3R & 6R - Medical office on two lots on 5.5 acres located on the north side of National Drive, 285 feet west of Gillespie Drive. Zoned Regional Employment and located within the State Highway 121 Overlay District. Projects #PR2023-006, #SP2023-011, and #RSP2023-022. Applicant: TSC Interests, LLC (Administrative consideration)]
ITEM NUMBER FOUR, PUBLIC HEARING.PRELIMINARY REPLAT SITE PLAN AND REVISED SITE PLAN.
NORTH GLENN TWO EDITION BLOCK B LOTS THREE R AND SIX.
THIS IS A MEDICAL OFFICE ON TWO LOTS ON 5.5 ACRES LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF NATIONAL DRIVE.
285 FEET WEST OF GILLESPIE DRIVE ZONE REGIONAL EMPLOYMENT AND LOCATED WITHIN THE STATE HIGHWAY 1 21 OVERLAY DISTRICT.
APPLICANT IS T S C INTERESTS L L C.
[00:10:01]
ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION.THE PRELIMINARY REPLAT IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL SUBJECT TO ADDITIONS AND OR ALTERATIONS TO THE ENGINEERING PLANS AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND THE SITE PLAN AND REVISED SITE PLAN ARE RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL AS SUBMITTED.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
DO THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF ON THIS ONE? OKAY, WELL, SEEING NONE I WILL NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS COMMISSION? WE DO NOT HAVE ANY REGISTERED SPEAKERS.
OKAY, WELL I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND UM, WE WILL HAVE COMMENTS BETWEEN, UH, COMMISSION AND STAFF HERE.
MR. CHAIRMAN, I RECOMMEND I, UH, MAKE A MOTION THAT WE APPROVE THE PRELIMINARY REPLAT SUBJECT TO ADDITIONS AND ALTERATIONS BY THE, THE ENGINEERING PLANS AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT AND APPROVE THE SITE PLAN AND REVISED SITE PLAN AS SUBMITTED.
WELL DONE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER, UM, REIFF AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER OLEY, PLEASE VOTE AND ONCE AGAIN BY SEVEN TO OH THIS, THIS PASSES.
[5. (DS) Public Hearing - Preliminary Replat: Parker Road Marketplace Addition, Block A, Lots 1R & 2R - Independent living facility on Lot 1R and vacant lot on Lot 2R on 8.7 acres located on the west side of Jupiter Road, 227 feet south of Parker Road. Zoned Retail. Project #PR2023-008. Applicant: SWC Parker Jupiter, Ltd. (Administrative consideration)]
ITEM NUMBER FIVE, PUBLIC HEARING PRELIMINARY REPLAT PARKER ROAD MARKETPLACE EDITION BLOCK A LOTS ONE R AND TWO R INDEPENDENT LIVING FACILITY ON LOT ONE R AND VACANT LOT ON VACANT LOT ON LOT TWO R ON 8.7 ACRES LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF JUPITER ROAD.227 FEET SOUTH OF PARKER ROAD.
APPLICANT IS S W C PARKER JUPITER LIMITED.
THIS IS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION.
THIS ITEM IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL SUBJECT TO ADDITIONS AND OR ALTERATIONS TO THE ENGINEERING PLANS AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
AND DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STEPH ON THIS ITEM? SEEING NONE, THANK YOU.
I WILL NOT OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS COMMISSION? WE DO NOT HAVE ANY REGISTERED SPEAKERS ON THIS ITEM.
I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND CONFINE COMMENTS TO COMMISSION AND STAFF.
MR. CHAIRMAN, I MOVE THAT WE APPROVE ITEM THIS IS FIVE.
ITEM FIVE, UM, SUBJECT TO ADDITIONS AND OR ALTERATIONS TO THE ENGINEERING PLANS IS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, SAGAN.
OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER BRUNO A AND A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER TONG.
AND ONCE AGAIN THIS ITEM PASSES BY SEVEN TO ZERO.
[6. (RP) Public Hearing - Preliminary Replat: The Park on 14th Addition, Block A, Lot 1 - 62 multifamily residence units on one lot on 1.5 acres located at the southwest corner of 14th Street and G Avenue. Zoned Planned Development-123-Downtown Business/Government. Project #PR2023-010. Applicant: Texas State Affordable Housing Corporation (Administrative consideration)]
ITEM NUMBER SIX, PUBLIC HEARING PRELIMINARY REPLAT, THE PARK ON 14TH EDITION BLOCK A LOT.1 62 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENCE UNITS ON ONE LOT ON 1.5 ACRES LOCATED AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF 14TH STREET AND G AVENUE ZONE PLAN DEVELOPMENT.
1 23 DOWNTOWN BUSINESS SLASH GOVERNMENT APPLICANT IS TEXAS STATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION.
THIS IS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION.
THIS ITEM IS RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL SUBJECT TO ADDITIONS AND OR ALTERATIONS TO THE ENGINEERING PLANS AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.
HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
DO THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY TECHNICAL QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? SEEING NONE, I WILL NOW OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING.
AND DO DOES THE APPLICANT WISH TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSIONER? YES, WE HAVE DAVID NELL DIL WITH TEXAS STATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION.
DAVID DENON, FELDER, SENIOR DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT FINANCE FOR THE TEXAS STATE AFFORDABLE HOUSING CORPORATION.
FIRST OF ALL, I THINK I CHECKED THE WRONG BOX.
I WAS JUST GONNA, I'LL BE HERE FOR ANY OF YOUR QUESTIONS, BUT I WANT TO THANK THE CHAIR AND ALL THE MEMBERS FOR YOUR TIME TONIGHT.
LET'S KEEP THE MOMENTUM GOING ON THOSE VOTES.
SO THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS, HAVE MANY QUESTIONS FOR THE APPLICANT? OKAY, SEEING NONE THEN I WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND CONFINE COMMENTS TO THE COMMISSION AND STAFF.
UM, MR. CHAIRMAN, I MOVE, WE APPROVE AGENDA ITEM NUMBER SIX, PRELIMINARY RE REPLY, SUBJECT TO ADDITIONS AND ALTERATIONS TO THE ENGINEERING PLANS AS REQUIRED BY THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.
SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION BY COMMISSIONER OLEY AND A SECOND BY
[00:15:01]
COMMISSIONER BROSKY.AND THIS ITEM PASSES SEVEN TO ZERO NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS. THE PRESIDING OFFICER WILL PERMIT LIMITED PUBLIC COMMENT FOR ITEMS ON THE AGENDA NOT POSTED FOR A PUBLIC HEARING.
PRESIDING OFFICER WILL ESTABLISH TIME LIMITS BASED UPON THE NUMBER OF SPEAKER REQUESTS, LENGTH OF THE AGENDA, AND TO ENSURE MEETING EFFICIENCY AND MAY INCLUDE A TOTAL TIME LIMIT AGENDA.
[7. (RK) Discussion: Presentation on the 2023 Development Handbook, with information from Planning, Engineering, and Building Inspections Departments. Project #DI2023-011. Applicant: City of Plano]
NUMBER SEVEN IS A DISCUSSION PRESENTATION ON THE 2023 DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK WITH INFORMATION FROM PLANNING, ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTION D INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENTS.APPLICANT IS CITY OF PLANO, NO GOOD EVENING.
I'M ROBIN KIRK, A SENIOR PLANNER IN THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
I'M JOINED TONIGHT BY SEVERAL COLLEAGUES.
I'M FROM PLANNING MELISSA KLEINK, LEAD PLANNER FOR DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION, AND CHRISTINA SEBASTIAN, THE LAND RECORDS MANAGER.
UH, WE'RE ALSO JOINED TONIGHT BY BUILDING INSPECTIONS MANAGER GINA SCOTT AND ENGINEERING MANAGER MIKE MARTIN.
WE ARE ALL FAMILIAR WITH THE DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK TEXT AND AVAILABLE TO ANSWER QUESTIONS AND RECORD SUGGESTIONS, UH, THROUGHOUT THIS DISCUSSION.
SO DO THE COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STEPH ON THIS ITEM? OH, EXCUSE ME.
UH, BOTH THE CONTENTS AND STRUCTURE OF THE DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK WERE GUIDED BY STAFF EXPERIENCE WITH THE INTERCONNECTEDNESS OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS IN OUR WORK SERVING APPLICANTS, WE'VE BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE OVERLAPPING NATURE AND TIMELINES OF THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT, ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT, AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND PROCESSES, A FAR OF USE.
THE BOOK IS DIVIDED BY DEVELOPMENT TYPE AS SHOWN IN THE LOWER HALF OF THIS SLIDE, AN INFORMATION IS PROVIDED AND REPEATED AS NEEDED SO THAT EACH SECTION IS SELF-CONTAINED.
UH, THE FIRST DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK WAS PUBLISHED IN 1994 BY WHAT WAS THEN CALLED THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
THE HANDBOOK WAS INITIALLY DIVIDED INTO SECTIONS BY CITY DEPARTMENT WITH SUBSECTIONS FOR NON-RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
WE FOUND OLDER RECORDS MENTIONING THAT THE HANDBOOK WAS WELL RECEIVED BY LAND DEVELOPERS, BUT IT'S NOT CLEAR WHEN OR WHY THIS HANDBOOK STOPPED BEING UPDATED AND OFFERED.
THE REST OF THE PRESENTATION WILL BE A GUIDE THROUGH THE ORDER OF THE DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK WITH AN EMPHASIS ON THE TYPE OF INFORMATION PROVIDED FOR EACH DESIRED DEVELOPMENT GOAL.
THE PROCESS STEPS ARE GENERALLY DESCRIBED HERE.
WE START WITH A PRE-APPLICATION MEETING THAT BRINGS TOGETHER STAFF FROM ALL POTENTIAL REVIEWING DEPARTMENTS.
STAFF CAN ADVISE ON THE PROJECT CONCEPT PRIOR TO DEVELOPERS INVESTING IN PROFESSIONAL DRAWINGS OR APPLICATION FEES.
THE NEXT STEPS WILL INCLUDE ANY NECESSARY REZONING, THE SUBMITTAL OF REQUIRED DEVELOPMENT PLANS AND PLATS, AND THE SUBMITTAL OF BUILDING PLANS WITH ENGINEERING AND BUILDING PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS REQUIRED THROUGHOUT THE PROCESS.
THIS SLIDE IS AN ABRIDGED VERSION OF THE FLOW CHART FOUND IN THE HANDBOOK NEAR THE BEGINNING, UH, SHOWING DEVELOPMENT STEPS BASED ON PROJECT TYPE.
THE DARK BLUE INDICATES STEPS REQUIRED REGARDLESS OF DEVELOPMENT TYPE.
THE ORANGE INDICATES STEPS IN THE PRIMARILY NON-RESIDENTIAL SECTION AND THE ENLIGHT PURPLE INDICATE STEPS IN THE PRIMARILY TRADITIONAL SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT SECTION OF THE BOOK SHOWN HERE ARE THE STEPS IN THE ZONING PROCESS, WHICH ARE DESCRIBED IN GREATER DETAIL.
STAFF MEMBERS RECEIVE FREQUENT QUESTIONS ABOUT THE REZONING PROCESS FROM BOTH DEVELOPERS AND RESIDENTS.
SO THE ZONING PROCESS INCLUDES SUBMITTAL MATERIALS FOR STAFF REVIEW CYCLES, AS WELL AS PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS.
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IS AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE ZONING PROCESS AND OTHER DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES.
AND PLANO PROVIDES A LARGE LIST OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR BOTH PROVIDING PUBLIC INFORMATION AND RECEIVING PUBLIC INPUT.
SOME NOTIFICATION TYPES ARE BASED ON PROXIMITY TO THE ZONING SUBJECT AREA WHILE OTHERS ARE BROADLY AVAILABLE.
THIS ALSO PROVIDES NOTICE OPPORTUNITIES FOR ZONING CASES THAT AREN'T LAND-BASED, SUCH AS TEXT AMENDMENTS.
THIS IS A LIST OF THE CURRENT NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES AVAILABLE FOR ZONING CASES.
IT INCLUDES MULTIPLE INFORMATION POSTING ITEMS TO EXPAND OUTREACH, AND IT ALSO INCLUDES TOOLS DESIGNED TO RECEIVE RESPONSES.
ALL OF THESE ARE DESCRIBED WITHIN THE PUBLIC PARTICIPATION SECTION OF THE DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK.
SO THESE IMAGES SHOWED THE STANDARD PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE FOR PROPOSED ZONING CHANGES.
THIS NOTICE INCLUDES INFORMATION AND MAP SHOWING THE PROPOSED REZONING AREA AND A SPACE FOR RECEIVING
[00:20:01]
PUBLIC COMMENT FROM PROXIMATE RESIDENTS AND BUSINESSES.THE TYPICAL ZONING PROCESS CULMINATES IN PUBLIC HEARINGS AND VOTES BEFORE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AND CITY COUNCIL.
THIS NEXT SECTION OF THE HANDBOOK PROVIDES THE STEPS THAT APPLY TO NON-RESIDENTIAL IN SOME FORMS OF RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
MULTI-FAMILY PROJECTS FOLLOW THESE STEPS AND, UH, PATIO HOME AND ATTACHED SINGLE-FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS.
ALSO FOLLOW THE NON-RESIDENTIAL PLAN AND PLA REVIEW PROCESS.
FOR THE MOST PART, PLANNING STAFF DO FREQUENTLY RECEIVE QUESTIONS ABOUT THE APPLICABILITY OF PLAN REQUIREMENTS TO SPECIFIC PROJECT TYPES.
SO THIS IS AN AREA OF FOCUS FOR THE HANDBOOK.
UH, THE NEXT THREE SLIDES COVER THE SEVEN STEPS OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS FOR THESE PROJECT TYPES.
THE FIRST DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL INCLUDES A CONCEPT PLAN OR PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN AND A CONVEYANCE PLAN WHEN NECESSARY.
THE SECOND STEP IS THE SITE PLAN PACKAGE AS DESCRIBED ON THIS SLIDE, WHICH INCLUDES FULL ENGINEERING PLANS AS WELL AS THE OTHER ITEMS SHOWN HERE.
AFTER ENGINEERING PLANS ARE RECEIVED AND UNDER REVIEW, CONSTRUCTION AND ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ARE NECESSARY PRIOR TO SUBMITTAL AND APPROVAL OF THE FINAL PLAT TESTING AND INSPECTIONS WILL OCCUR THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PROCESS.
SO BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS ARE SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED.
CONSTRUCTION COMMENCES WITH REQUIRED INSPECTIONS THROUGHOUT THE PROCESS.
THE FINAL PLAT IS SUBMITTED AFTER ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS.
AFTER THE FINAL PLOT IS APPROVED AND FILED OF RECORD AND ALL INSPECTIONS ARE COMPLETED, A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY CAN BE ISSUED.
SOME ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION IS ALSO PROVIDED IN THIS SECTION OF THE HANDBOOK, UM, THAT INCLUDES INFORMATION ON STREET RESERVATION NAMING, ADDRESSING THE APPEALS PROCESS IN THE EVENT OF A DENIAL, UM, PROCEDURES FOR WHEN A PLANNER PLAT EXPIRES OR IS NEARING EXPIRATION.
ADDITIONAL STEPS APPLICABLE TO REDEVELOPMENT ON BOTH SMALL AND LARGER SCALES AND, UH, OTHER TOPICS ARE COVERED AS WELL.
THE HANDBOOK ALSO CONTAINS INFORMATION ON CHANGE OF OCCUPANCY PROCEDURES, WHICH STAFF IS FREQUENTLY ASKED ABOUT.
A CO IS REQUIRED FOR OCCUPANCY OF ANY NON-RESIDENTIAL BUILDING OR SUITE.
AND FOR MULTIFAMILY BUILDINGS, THOUGH NOT THE INDIVIDUAL DWELLING UNITS WITHIN A CO IS ALSO REQUIRED TO CHANGE OWNERSHIP OR BUSINESS NAME EVEN IF NO INTERIOR WORK IS PLANNED.
CHANGES IN LAND USE MAY REQUIRE UPDATES TO COMPLY WITH FIRE AND BUILDING CODES.
SO WE DO ENCOURAGE APPLICANTS TO CONTACT US PRIOR TO SIGNING ANY CONTRACTS OR LEASES FOR SPACES WHERE A CHANGE OF USE IS REQUIRED.
IN ADDITION TO THE BUILDING PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS ALREADY MENTIONED, BUILDING INSPECTIONS ISSUES, BUILDING PERMITS FOR SOME NON-RESIDENTIAL AND SELECT RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDING THOSE LISTED HERE AND WITHIN THE HANDBOOK.
SO THE NEXT SECTION OF THE HANDBOOK PROVIDES THE STEPS FOR DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY AND DUPLEX SUBDIVISION DEVELOPMENT, PATIO HOME AND DETACHED SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENTS FOLLOW THE NON-RESIDENTIAL PLAN AND PLA REVIEW PROCESSES AS PREVIOUSLY MENTIONED.
THE NEXT TWO SLIDES COVERED THE SEVEN STEPS OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS FOR THESE PROJECT TYPES, WHICH ARE SLIGHTLY DIFFERENT.
THE FIRST DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTAL INCLUDES A CONCEPT PLAN OR A PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN.
AFTER THIS, THE PRELIMINARY PLAT STEP IS SECOND, AND THIS INCLUDES THE FULL ENGINEERING PLAN SUBMITTAL, CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS BEGINS AND THE FINAL PLAT IS SUBMITTED AND RECORDED IF APPROVED.
THE FIFTH STEP IS CITY ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AFTER WHICH BUILDING PERMITS ARE SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED ALONG WITH THE REQUIRED INSPECTIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION.
OCCUPANCY OF THE UNIT IS THE FINAL STEP, ALTHOUGH NO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY IS REQUIRED TO OCCUPY A RESIDENCE.
ADDITIONAL DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION IS ALSO PROVIDED IN THIS SECTION OF THE HANDBOOK.
THIS SECTION INCLUDES INFORMATION ON SUBDIVISION AMENITIES, UH, WHICH YOU CAN INCLUDE HOA REQUIREMENTS, STREET RESERVATION AND NAMING, ADDRESSING THE APPEALS PROCESS AND EVENT OF A DENIAL PROCEDURES FOR WHEN A PLANNER PLAT EXPIRES OR IS NEARING EXPIRATION AND SOME OTHER TOPICS.
IN ADDITION TO THE BUILDING PERMITS AND INSPECTIONS ALREADY MENTIONED, BUILDING INSPECTIONS DOES ISSUE SOME BUILDING PERMITS FOR RESIDENTIAL IMPROVEMENTS, INCLUDING THOSE SHOWN HERE.
THE DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK PROVIDES TWO IMPORTANT APPENDICES AS WELL.
THE FIRST IS A SET OF FLOW CHARTS SHOWING THE STEPS FOR THE ZONING PROCESS FOR EACH PLAN AND PLAT SUBMITTAL TYPE INDIVIDUALLY INCLUDING SHOT CLOCK AND PRE-B SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES AND FOR BILLING PERMITS.
[00:25:01]
THE COLOR CODING WITHIN THE FLOW CHARTS AS SHOWN ON THIS SLIDE, SHOWS WHICH STEPS ARE REQUIRED OF APPLICANTS AND WHICH ARE DONE BY STAFF, WHICH AIDS AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE PROCESS.THE SECOND APPENDIX PROVIDES A, UH, COMPREHENSIVE LIST OF ONLINE RESOURCES, MANY OF WHICH STAFF SEND OUT ON A DAILY BASIS.
IN RESPONSE TO APPLICANT INQUIRIES, WE PROVIDED LINKS HERE TO APPLICATION MATERIALS, TO DEPARTMENT WEBSITES WITH CONTACTS TO SOME PUBLIC FACING MAPS THAT ARE USEFUL TO RELEVANT CITY CODES AND ORDINANCES TO THE, UH, CENTRAL APPRAISAL DISTRICTS WITHIN PLANO AND TO POPULAR REQUEST FORMS. WE CAN EASILY UPDATE THIS LIST AS NEW RESOURCES ARE CREATED.
THANK YOU AND STAFF MEMBERS ARE HAPPY TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT DEVELOPMENT HANDBOOK AT THIS TIME.
UM, THANK YOU FOR THAT PRESENTATION.
I MYSELF, AS I LOOK THROUGH THIS, UH, IT'S IMPRESSIVE TO ME AND I THINK WHAT, UH, WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO DO HERE IS, IS MAKE IT EFFICIENT AND EASY FOR FOLKS TO DO BUSINESS WITH US.
SO, UH, ANYWAY, I WAS, I WAS IMPRESSED.
UH, DO WE HAVE, UH, QUESTIONS FOR THE STAFF? YEAH, THANK YOU CHAIRMAN.
UM, FIRST OF ALL, THANKS, UM, PROFESSIONALLY, I WORK ALL OVER THE COUNTRY DOING THIS AND VERY WELL DONE.
I I WISH Y'ALL, Y'ALL BE SETTING A MODEL FOR THE COUNTRY WITH THIS DOCUMENT.
UM, I DO HAVE ONE FAIRLY MINOR COMMENT, UM, ON, WE HAVE A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN YOUR FLOW CHART ON PAGE 71 AND THE VERBIAGE ON PAGE 26.
AND IT'S A, IT'S A MINOR ISSUE, BUT THE, THE FLOW CHART IS THE WAY Y'ALL HAVE ALWAYS DONE THINGS, BUT THE VERBIAGE CHANGES THAT A LITTLE BIT.
UM, THE VERBIAGE ON PAGE 26, LEMME GET BACK TO IT HERE.
UM, IT SAYS, UM, BUILDING PERMITS CAN ONLY BE APPROVED AND ISSUED ONCE THE CITY ACCEPTS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS.
TRADITIONALLY THAT THE CO CAN ONLY BE ISSUED ONCE THE CITY ACCEPTS PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS.
BUT THIS VERY CLEARLY SAYS YOU WON'T ISSUE THE BUILDING PERMIT UNTIL YOU'VE ACCEPTED THE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS ON A COMMERCIAL PROJECT, WHICH IS NOT TYPICALLY THE WAY Y'ALL DONE BUSINESS.
AND BUT THE FLOW CHART HAS IT, THE, THE WAY Y'ALL TRADITIONALLY DONE IT, WHICH IS ENGINEERING IMPROVEMENTS ARE DONE SIMULTANEOUS WITH THE COMMERCIAL CONSTRUCTION AND ACCEPTED PRIOR TO CO.
AND SO I JUST WANNA MAKE SURE WE'RE NOT MAKING A CHANGE IN THAT PROCESS.
AND IF WE'RE NOT MAKING A CHANGE, UM, RECOMMEND THAT THE LANGUAGE ON PAGE 26 GET CLEANED UP A LITTLE BIT.
YEAH, NO CHANGES ARE PROPOSED.
THIS IS PURELY INFORMATIVE, SO WE'LL MAKE SURE TO UPDATE WITH THE CORRECT INFORMATION.
THANK YOU THAT THAT'S, UH, UM, OTHER THAN THAT, INCREDIBLE, UM, I HOPE MORE PEOPLE FOLLOW YOUR EXAMPLE.
CORRECT COMMISSIONER BRUNO? THANK YOU, MR. CHAIRMAN.
UM, YEAH, LET ME ALSO ADD MY COMMENT THAT, UH, IT WAS, UH, ILLUMINATING TO ME TO SEE THE WHOLE PROCESS LAID OUT IN A SORT OF A TIME SEQUENCE MANNER SO WE CAN GET AN OVERVIEW OF EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENS, UH, RATHER THAN JUST LOOK AT INDIVIDUAL ITEMS ON OUR AGENDAS AND, YOU KNOW, WITHOUT REALLY UNDERSTANDING WHERE THEY FIT INTO THE, THE BROADER PROCESS, UM, FROM MY INSPECTION OF YOUR FLOW CHARTS.
AM I CORRECT IN CONCLUDING THAT WITH RES WITH RESPECT TO PLATS AND SITE PLANS, APPROVAL BY THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION DOES NOT REQUIRE A SUBSEQUENT APPROVAL BY THE COUNCIL, IS THAT CORRECT? IT IT GOES STRAIGHT INTO ENGINEERING OR, UH, BUILDING PERMIT, RIGHT? THAT'S CORRECT.
EXCEPT IN RARE CASES OF APPEAL, I THINK, WELL, THERE'S AN APPEAL PROCESS IN THE EVENT THE COMMISSION DENIES SOMEBODY I UNDERSTAND THAT.
BUT, BUT IF, IF THE COMMISSION APPROVES IT IS WHAT I'M SAYING THAT'S FINAL.
UM, YOU MEN, YOU DESCRIBED THE PUBLIC NOTICE PROCEDURE FOR ZONING CASES, WHICH IS MANDATORY NOTICE WITHIN 200 FEET AND A COURTESY NOTICE WITHIN 500 FEET.
UH, IS THERE A PUBLIC NOTICE PROCEDURE FOR PLATS AND UM, UH, SITE PLANS COMING BEFORE THE COMMISSION? SO THERE IS NOTICE REQUIRED FOR RESIDENTIAL RE PLATS, I BELIEVE, BUT NO SITE PLANS.
COMMISSIONER ROWLEY, UM, ECHO EVERYTHING EVERYONE SAID, UM, SOCCER FOR FLOW CHAT.
SO IT'S KIND OF NICE TO SEE HOW THE FLOW GOES.
AND ALSO IF I WAS A DEVELOPER, THIS IS THE CLEANLINESS OF WHAT STEPS I NEED TO HIT.
UM, I'M SURE THEY, UH, GREATLY APPRECIATE.
THIS IS MORE FOR MY EDUCATION.
AND A BIT OF A CURIOSITY TO A COMMENT YOU MADE.
WHY IS THE PATIO HOME AND ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY FLOW THAT
[00:30:01]
DRASTICALLY DIFFERENT FROM THE TRADITIONAL SINGLE FAMILY FLOW? LET ME BACK UP AND MAKE SURE I UNDERSTAND YOU, YOU'RE REFERRING TO HERE, LIKE THE NON-RESIDENTIAL AND MULTI-FAMILY, I CAN CAN UNDERSTAND WHY THE, YOU KNOW, THE FLOW THERE A LOT MORE ADDITIONAL STEPS AND WHAT HAVE YOU.UM, I'M CURIOUS AS TO WHY THE PATIO HOME AND ATTACHED SINGLE FAMILY HAS LIKE THREE OR FOUR MORE STEPS THAN THE TRADITIONAL SINGLE FAMILY FLOW CHART.
SO, UH, THERE ARE SOME ADDITIONAL, UM, REQUIREMENTS FOR SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED IN PATIO, HOME COMMUNITIES.
THERE'S REQUIRED OPEN SPACE, THERE ARE REQUIRED PUBLIC PARKING SPACES, THINGS LIKE THAT.
SO IT'S HARD TO CAPTURE THOSE ITEMS ON A PLA UM, AND MAKE SURE THAT THEY MEET THE CITY'S REQUIREMENTS.
UM, THEY INCLUDE THINGS SUCH AS DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS AND DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS.
SO FOR THOSE REASONS WE HAVE INCLUDED A SITE PLAN REQUIREMENT.
SO WOULD THAT BE BECAUSE THEY WOULD MOST LIKELY BE PART OF A PLAN DEVELOPMENT? NO, OR JUST IN GENERAL? JUST BECAUSE OF THE FORM OF THE DEVELOPMENT AND THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AMENITIES IN THE NEIGHBORHOOD.
UM, THERE'S SPECIFIC DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS, UH, FOR THOSE AMENITIES, AND WE JUST NEEDED A WAY TO CAPTURE THAT THOSE REQUIREMENTS WERE MET AND THAT'S DONE THROUGH THE SITE PLAN PROCESS.
SO THAT'S WHERE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND ALL OF THAT COMES IN TO CAPTURE THE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT.
UH, COMMISSIONER WA I'M JUST CURIOUS ABOUT THE SECOND TO LAST BULLET POINT.
CHANGES IN LAND USE MAY REQUIRE UPDATES TO THE BUILDING.
ISN'T THAT A, WOULDN'T THAT BE A OCCUPANCY USE IF IT'S A CHANGE TO A BUILDING? AND THEN WHAT DO WE DO IF THERE'S JUST A USE ON JUST A LAND OCCUPANCY SITUATION WITHOUT A BUILDING? I KNOW THERE'S OCCUPANCY OR LAND USE PERMITS.
WHERE IS THAT CAPTURED IN THE PROCESS? AND I KNOW IT'S ONE IN A MILLION HERE IN PLANO.
WE MOST LAND HAS BUILDINGS, UH, RIGHT.
I'M SORRY, CAN YOU STATE YOUR QUESTION AGAIN? I'M JUST TRYING TO FOLLOW YOU.
HOW DOES THE CHANGES IN LAND USE? WHAT IF THERE ISN'T A BUILDING ON THE LAND? RIGHT, SO DEPENDING UPON THE USE OF THE PROPERTY.
SO WE DO HAVE CERTIFICATES OF OCCUPANCY FOR, UM, LAND AS WELL AS FOR BUILDINGS.
AND IF IT'S A LAND-BASED CO, UM, THE USE MAY REQUIRE THINGS TO BE BROUGHT UP TO, MAY REQUIRE A FIRE LANE.
IT MAY REQUIRE, WELL TYPICALLY NOT, BUT IT MAY REQUIRE PARKING CHANGES.
IT MAY REQUIRE IF IT'S OPEN STORAGE, SOME PAVING, THINGS LIKE THAT.
AND THEN I JUST WANTED TO ONE MORE CLARIFICATION ITEM IN THE FLOW CHART, AND I DON'T, I DIDN'T CATCH THE SLIDE NUMBER, BUT THE FLOW CHART, YOU DON'T ACTUALLY HAVE TO HAVE A SITE PLAN AND PAPERWORK BEFORE YOU GO THROUGH THE ZONING PROCESS OTHER THAN THE APPLICATION TO DO THE ZONING.
IS THAT CORRECT? IS THAT, NO, YOU DON'T HAVE TO HAVE THE ONLY, UM, PLAN THAT'S REQUIRED IN ZONING.
THERE'S A CONCEPT PLAN REQUIREMENT FOR A PLAN DEVELOPMENT REQUEST, OR THERE'S A DEVELOPMENT PLAN REQUIREMENT FOR AN URBAN MIXED USE OR A NEIGHBORHOOD BUSINESS DESIGN DISTRICT.
THE OTHER, UH, TYPES OF ZONING, IF IT'S A STRAIGHT ZONING THAT'S NOT A REQUIRED PLAN, STAFF USUALLY RECOMMENDS IT AND IT'S USUALLY PROVIDED, IT'S, IT HELPS THE COMMUNITY AND, UM, THE COMMISSION AND COUNCIL KIND OF UNDERSTAND, UM, WHAT THE REQUEST IS AND REALLY PUTS PEN TO PAPER.
SO AS THEY BRING THEIR REQUEST FORWARD, UM, IT'S REALLY EVIDENT THAT THE REQUEST FITS WELL ON THE PROPERTY.
SO IT'S NOT REQUIRED EXCEPT FOR CERTAIN INSTANCES, BUT IT'S OFTEN PROVIDED AND WE USUALLY RECOMMEND IT.
AND THEN LASTLY, JUST PIGGYBACKING ON CHAIRMAN, CARRIE OR VICE CHAIR CARRIE'S COMMENTS ABOUT IT BEING A BEAUTIFUL DOCUMENT AND, UH, WE WANT IT TO BE EFFICIENT TO DO BUSINESS HERE IN PLANO.
HERE'S YOUR 85 PAGES
DID YOU WANT IT'S NOT ON ANY, OH WAIT, WE'RE BACK HERE.
UH, MR. BROSKY, UH, ONE, I WANNA SAY, UH, GREAT JOB.
[00:35:01]
I'M ALWAYS EXCITED WHENEVER I HEAR THE PROCESS BEING TALKED ABOUT HOW WE INTENTIONALLY COLLECT INFORMATION AND SHARE IT.UM, I JUST HAD TWO REAL SMALL QUESTIONS ABOUT THE APPENDIX AND MAYBE THINGS THAT MAY COULD BE ADDED.
UM, THE ZONING ALERT AND RESPONSE TOOL AND, UM, THE DENSITY GUIDANCE MAPS.
DO WE, UH, WOULD THAT MAKE SENSE TO PROVIDE EITHER OF THOSE TWO? I MEAN, THE DENSITY GUIDANCE CERTAINLY FOR PEOPLE THAT ARE LOOKING TO, UM, GO AHEAD.
YEAH, I THINK THE DENSITY GUIDANCE, THAT'S REALLY A, A COMP PLAN SITUATION, SO, UM, IT, IT LIVES THERE.
WE COULD, IF THERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY FOR IT TO BE PLACED IN THE HANDBOOK, I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S A, A CONNECTION TO THE HANDBOOK.
WE COULD POTENTIALLY PUT IT UNDER THE, THE LINK FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO HAVE A SPECIFIC PAGE SINCE DEVELOPERS WOULD BE INTERESTED IN, IN THAT, UM, IN THE LAND USE AND HOUSING INVENTORY.
RIGHT? YEAH, THAT'S WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT,
YEAH, WELL SAME WITH THE ZONING ALERT TOOL.
AND WE HAVE ONE MORE QUESTION.
UM, I DID HAVE MY LIGHT ON EARLIER THAN MY QUESTION KIND OF GOT ANSWERED BY, UM, COMMISSIONER MORALE'S QUESTION.
AND NOW I HAVE ANOTHER QUESTION REGARDING, UM, SOME OTHER COMMISSIONER REMINDED ME THAT IN THE FUTURE, BECAUSE RIGHT NOW WE DON'T HAVE A LOT OF LAND TO NEW DEVELOPMENT, AND I REALIZED A LOT OF OUR, UH, EXISTING HOMES MAY BE UNDER GOING, UH, REMODELING OR MAYBE BUILDING COTTAGES IN THE BACKYARD OR HAVING HOME ADDITIONS FILLED OUT.
UH, WHICH PART OF PROCESS WOULD THAT FIT INTO? UH, IF THEY WANNA BUILD A ACCESSORY BUILDING? I SEE ONE OF THE SLIDES HAS THE ACCESSORY BUILDING, BUT THAT SEEM TO BE A PART OF A, A NORMAL TRADITIONAL RESIDENCE PROCESS.
BUT WHAT IF THE RESIDENCE IS ALREADY THERE? THE COM BUILDING IS ALREADY THERE, BUT YOU'RE ADDING SOMETHING TO IT.
FOR TRADITIONAL SINGLE FAMILY, UH, BUILDING INSPECTIONS HANDLES THE PERMITTING AND THE REVIEW OF THOSE PLANS FOR THOSE SITUATIONS.
SO THAT DOES NOT COME BEFORE THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION.
SO THIS IS, THAT WILL BE OUTSIDE OF THIS PROCESS, RIGHT? IT'S PART OF THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS, BUT IT WOULD BE HANDLED BY BUILDING INSPECTIONS THROUGH THEIR PERMITTING, EVEN IF THEY'RE BUILDING A BRAND NEW BUILDING IN THEIR BACKYARD.
IF IT'S A BACKYARD COTTAGE, IT'S CORRECT.
IT ALSO GOES THROUGH BUILDING INSPECTIONS FOR PERMITTING.
IT DOES NOT COME TO, TO PLANNING FOR REVIEW.
AND, AND IN THE OTHER BUILDING PERMIT SECTION OF THE RESIDE, UH, TRADITIONAL RESIDENTIAL SECTION, THERE'S RESIDENTIAL ACCESSORY BUILDINGS ARE BRIEFLY COVERED, UM, FOR ANY ACCESSORY BUILDINGS, INCLUDING BACKYARD COTTAGES, UM, WE COULD POTENTIALLY ADD MORE INFORMATION ABOUT BACKYARD COTTAGES.
WELL, I THINK THAT WRAPS UP THE QUESTIONS, SO THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
ALSO, THIS IS A NON-PUBLIC HEARING ITEM.
ARE THERE ANY REGISTERED SPEAKERS FOR THIS ITEM? NO, WE DO NOT.
WELL THEN SEEING NONE COMMENTS ARE COMBINED TO THE COMMISSION AND STAFF.
ANYMORE COMMENTS? OKAY, WELL, UM, IN CONCLUDING THIS, I I PERSONALLY WOULD LIKE TO SAY I, AGAIN, I'M IMPRESSED WITH WHAT WE'RE DOING HERE.
I THINK YOU GUYS HAVE DONE GREAT WORK.
I, I ACTUALLY DO HAVE A QUESTION FOR ERIC.
I HAVE TO BELIEVE THIS ALLOWS YOUR STAFF AND ALL OF YOU TO BE MORE EFFECTIVE ONCE THIS IS DONE AND PUBLISHED THERE, THERE HAS TO BE BENEFIT TO YOUR TEAM IN THAT REGARD.
YOU KNOW, COMMISSIONER LAO MENTIONED THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS.
IT'S VERY SOPHISTICATED IN PLANO AND WE ROUTINELY HAVE CONVERSATIONS.
TYPICALLY WE HAVE FOUR PRE-APPLICATION MEETINGS EVERY WEEK WHERE WE'RE JUST GOING THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS AND TALKING TO A, A, A DEVELOPER ABOUT NEW PROPERTY, UH, YOU KNOW, SITUATION.
SO THIS IS GONNA BE REAL, REALLY HELPFUL FOR US TO JUST PROVIDE THEM, YOU KNOW, SOMETHING THAT THEY CAN ACTUALLY REVIEW.
YES, IT IS LENGTHY AND IT MAY NOT BE HELPFUL TO ALL, BUT WE THINK IT WILL BE VERY HELPFUL TO SOME.
YEAH, I HAVE TO BELIEVE THAT'S THE CASE.
SO THANK YOU FOR THE PRESENTATION.
AND I, I, THE FINAL THING I'D SAY IS AS I'VE SET HERE ON COMMISSION FOR A FEW YEARS, ONE OF THE THINGS I SEE IS THESE TYPES OF THINGS.
THIS TEAM CONTINUES TO PUSH FORWARD AND I, I'M, I'M REALLY EXCITED TO WATCH THE WORK THAT'S DOING AND EVEN HAVE A SMALL PART AS, AS WE EVOLVE.
CUZ I THINK YOU KNOW, YOUR TEAM, YOU GUYS ARE DOING REALLY GOOD STUFF AND I THINK THIS IS A FANTASTIC EXAMPLE.
[8. (DW) Discussion and Action: Call for Public Hearing - Request to call a public hearing to amend the Zoning Ordinance regarding requiring a property with a backyard cottage to be owner-occupied after Hignell-Stark v. City of New Orleans. Project #CPH2023-006. Applicant: City of Plano (Administrative consideration)]
NUMBER EIGHT, DISCUSSION AND ACTION.REQUEST TO CALL A PUBLIC HEARING TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING REQUIRING A PROPERTY WITH A BACKYARD COTTAGE TO BE OWNER OCCUPIED AFTER HGK STARK VERSUS CITY OF NEW ORLEANS.
APPLICANT IS CITY OF PLANO, THIS IS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION.
MY NAME IS DANIEL WYATT, PLANNER WITH THE CITY OF PLANO.
UM, AGAIN, THIS IS A REQUEST TO CALL PUBLIC HEARING TO AMEND THE ZONING ORDINANCE REGARDING
[00:40:01]
REQUIRING A PROPERTY WITH A BACKYARD COTTAGE TO BE OWNER-OCCUPIED, UM, AFTER THE HG START VERSUS IN CITY NEWLAND'S CASE.UM, THIS CASE, UM, WAS IN THE FIRST CIRCUIT COURT APPEAL.
THEY FOUND THAT THE REGULATION REQUIRING A PROPERTY TO BE OWNER-OCCUPIED BY THE LATE VIOLATED THE DORMANT COM COMMERCE CLAUSE.
UM, THIS RULING WOULD IMPACT OUR CURRENT ZONING ORDINANCE, WHICH CURRENTLY REQUIRES, UH, EITHER THE MAIN ACCESSORY MAIN OR ACCESSORY STRUCTURE DWELLING, UH, TO BE OWNER-OCCUPIED.
UM, STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CALL THE PUBLIC HEARING TO ENSURE THE COMPLIANCE, UH, WITH THE COURT RULING.
UH, COMMISSIONERS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR STAFF? UH, JUST MOVE A PROCESS QUESTION.
UM, THIS IS GONNA BE NOTICE CITYWIDE IT.
YOU DON'T HAVE TO HAVE A COTTAGE ALREADY BUILT OUT, UM, TO GET NOTICE OF THIS, UH, PUBLIC HEARING.
IT'LL JUST BE THE STANDARD NEWSPAPER NOTICE FOR TEXT AMENDMENTS.
SO IT WON'T SPECIFICALLY GO TO ANYBODY WHO HAS A BACKYARD COTTAGE.
UM, JUST FOR THE RECORD, UM, I OWN A BACKYARD COTTAGE, SO I'M GONNA ABSTAIN FROM THIS VOTE.
SO FIRST, I MEAN, DO WE HAVE ANY SPEAKERS FOR THIS PARTICULAR ITEM? NO, WE DO NOT.
SO, UH, SINCE WE DON'T, I'LL CLOSE THIS HEARING AND CONFINE COMMENTS TO COMMISSIONER STAFF.
I MOVE, WE CALL A PUBLIC HEARING.
WE HAVE A CALL FOR A PUBLIC HEARING BY COMMISSIONER BROSKY AND A SECOND, BUT COMMISSIONER OLEY.
AND SO, UM, AND WE HAVE A, UH, A RECUSAL BY COMMISSIONER, UM, RATLIFF.
SO THAT'S AN ABSTENTION, NOT A RECUSAL, RIGHT? YES.
AND THE VOTE FOR THE CALLING, THE PUBLIC HEARING PASSES SIX TO ZERO.
[9. (MK) Discussion and Action: Call for Public Hearing - Request to call a public hearing to consider amendments to various sections of the Zoning Ordinance and Subdivision Ordinance pertaining to state legislative actions and to ensure compliance with state law. Project #CPH2023-007. Applicant: City of Plano (Administrative consideration)]
ITEM NUMBER NINE, DISCUSSION IN ACTION.REQUEST TO CALL A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO A STATE LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS.
AND TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW, APPLICANT IS CITY OF PLANO, THIS IS FOR ADMINISTRATIVE CONSIDERATION.
AND MELISSA KLEINK, LEAD PLANNER WITH THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT.
SO THIS IS A REQUEST TO CALL A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THESE ZONING AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCES PERTAINING TO STATE LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS.
THE 88TH TEXAS LEGISLATURE CONCLUDED ON MAY 29TH OF THIS YEAR.
STAFF IS CURRENTLY ANALYZING 17 BILLS THAT HAVE PASSED BOTH CHAMBERS.
THE DEADLINE FOR ACTION BY THE GOVERNOR IS JUNE 18TH.
AND UNLESS VETOED MOST BILLS WILL BECOME EFFECTIVE SEPTEMBER 1ST, ALTHOUGH SEVERAL BILLS BECOME EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY IF THEY RECEIVED A TWO THIRDS VOTE OF ALL MEMBERS ELECTED TO EACH HOUSE.
THIS REQUEST TO CALL A PUBLIC HEARING IS INTENDED TO COVER ANY ORDINANCE CHANGES THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED AS A RESULT OF THE BILLS PAST THIS SESSION.
ANY CHANGES TO REGULATION SHOULD BE FINALIZED BEFORE SEPTEMBER 1ST.
SO THE PROCESS FOR THESE ORDINANCE AMENDMENTS NEEDS TO BEGIN IMMEDIATELY.
IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT STAFF MAY ALSO INCLUDE UPDATES FROM PRIOR LEGISLATIVE SESSIONS BASED ON MORE RECENT LEGAL STANDARDS AND GENERAL PRACTICE WITHIN THE STATE STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION CALL A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER AMENDMENTS TO VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE AND SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO STATE LEGISLATIVE ACTIONS AND TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH STATE LAW.
AND I CAN ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS.
ALRIGHT SIR, DO WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? MR. STAFF? ANOTHER PROCESS QUESTION.
UM, WOULD WE, I GUESS THIS MIGHT BE MORE OF A QUESTION TO MICHELLE.
ARE WE GOING TO BE GIVEN A RUNDOWN OR SUMMARY OF ALL 17 OR JUST THE ONES YOU THINK PERTINENT TO, TO PLANO? HOW DOES THIS PLAY OUT? SO, UM, USUALLY WHAT WE DO IS JUST BRING ORDINANCE CHANGES TO YOU ALL, UM, SINCE THEY'RE REQUIRED.
SO WE GIVE YOU RED LINES SHOWING YOU THE OLD ORDINANCE AND THE NEW AND BRING THEM FOR ADOPTION.
IF, IS THERE GONNA BE ANYTHING DIFFERENT THIS YEAR, CHRISTINA? NO, THAT'S CORRECT.
UM, WE'LL JUST HIGHLIGHT THE, THE BILLS THAT ARE IMPACTING THE CHANGES WE'RE, WE'RE PROPOSING.
OTHER QUESTIONS? NO OTHER QUESTIONS THEN? UH, YES, MR. BROWN.
[00:45:03]
I CAN SEE THAT, UH, BOTH OF THE PUBLIC HEARINGS THAT WE'RE DEALING WITH ON THIS AGENDA, UH, MIGHT BE LENGTHY.AND I'M WONDERING WITHIN THE TIMEFRAME THAT THE CITY HAS TO FOLLOW IF THERE'S ROOM TO PERHAPS SPACE THEM OUT SO THEY'RE JUST NOT STACKED ON TOP OF EACH OTHER IN A SINGLE MEETING.
UH, TYPICALLY WE HANDLE THESE ITEMS AS, AS WE'RE ABLE TO, YEAH, I THINK BOTH OF THEM ARE PRESSING DUE TO ONE LEGISLATIVE CONCERN.
SO I I THINK WE'LL TRY TO GET THEM TO YOU AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
WE DO HAVE A LOT, QUITE A LOT OF OTHER THINGS ON OUR AGENDAS WITH SOME ZONING CASES IN THE WINGS AS WELL AS CHANGES FROM THE CONFERENCE OF PLAN.
SO WE'LL DEFINITELY TAKE A LOOK AT IT AND TRY TO, TO BALANCE OUT THE MEETING WORKLOADS.
SOUNDS LIKE WE'RE GONNA BE BUSY.
ANY, ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? SAYING NONE.
UM, DO WE HAVE ANY REGISTERED SPEAKERS? WE, WE DO.
THANK YOU FOR ALLOWING ME THIS OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK HERE TONIGHT.
EXCUSE ME, COULD YOU GIVE US YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS PLEASE? OH, I WAS, MY NAME IS SARAH STETLER AND I LIVE AT 2312 BRISBANE AT THE WEST PARK SUBDIVISION.
I'M HERE TO VOICE MY OPPOSITION TO THE REZONING AT CUSTER AND PARK.
UH, WHEN I FIRST SAW THE PROPOSAL, I WENT TO THE CITY'S WEBSITE AND ENTERED MY OFFICE.
I, I DON'T THINK THAT'S ON THE AGENDA.
SO, UM, THIS WASN'T ON THE AGENDA AND I'M NOT SURE THAT IT'S, WELL IT WAS EARLIER.
DOES IT, THIS PARTICULAR TIME IS FOR ANYTHING HAVING TO DO WITH THE CHANGES DUE TO THE LEGISLATURE OH, CHANGES TO ORDINANCE.
THE, THE GENERAL CALL FOR PUBLIC COMMENT WAS AT THE VERY, VERY BEGINNING OF THE MEETING.
SO, UH, DID I SIGN UP FOR THE WRONG TIME SIGN AGAIN FOR ITEM NINE.
MS. STETTLER, IF WE CAN GET YOUR INFORMATION, WE CAN, UH, GET BACK WITH YOU ON THAT IS GONNA BE SCHEDULED FOR A FUTURE AGENDA.
AND WE'LL BE HAPPY TO TALK TO YOU ABOUT THAT WHEN IT'S GONNA COME FORWARD.
I SAW THAT IT WAS GONNA BE, THERE WAS GONNA BE A CALL FOR PUBLIC, IT WILL BE ON AN AGENDA IN THE NEAR FUTURE AND WE CAN GIVE YOU INFORMATION ABOUT OKAY.
WHEN IT'S GONNA BE ON AND THAT'LL BE THE APPROPRIATE TIME TO ADDRESS IT.
SO ANY OTHER SPEAKERS? OKAY, WELL, WE'LL BARN THAT THEN WE WILL CONFINE COMMENTS TO COMMISSION.
I MOVE, WE CALL A PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS ISSUE.
SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION TO CALL A PUBLIC HEARING BY COMMISSIONER BROSKY IN A SECOND BY COMMISSIONER BROCK.
AND THAT MOTION PASSES SEVEN TO ZERO.
AND THAT BRINGS US TO THE END OF OUR MEETING, ESSENTIALLY COMMISSIONERS, DO WE HAVE ANY ITEMS WE WOULD LIKE TO PLACE ON A FUTURE AGENDA? AND, UH,
THEY SEEM TO BE BUILDING THEMSELVES, DON'T THEY? YEAH.
I'D LIKE TO SAY YOU'VE DONE A GOOD JOB TONIGHT.
YEAH, YOU'D LIKE TO BUT YOU'RE NOT GOING TO.
HEY, THANKS FOR MAKING IT EASY, ESPECIALLY TO ERIC AND HIS STAFF, BUT, UH, SO AS ALWAYS, YOU GUYS DO A GREAT JOB AND, UM, IT'S FUN BEING HERE.
SO I WILL CONCLUDE THE MEETING AND CALL THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT SEVEN FORTY EIGHT.
AND EVERYONE HAVE A WONDERFUL NIGHT.